Case 01 / 9Michigan City, IndianaUnited States

Jeffrey Weisheit Executed for 2010 Fire That Killed Alyssa and Caleb Lynch

Location: Indiana State Prison, Michigan City, Indiana, United States (crime near Evansville, Vanderburgh County)

Legal status: Death sentence carried out Nov. 5, 2026, at 12:45 a.m. Central time; convicted of murder and arson in 2013

The execution. Indiana carried out the death sentence of Jeffrey Weisheit early Thursday at the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City. The Indiana Capital Chronicle, the only media outlet present as a personal witness, reported that the Department of Correction said the process began shortly after midnight and that Weisheit was pronounced dead at 12:45 a.m. Central Standard Time. Witnesses, including Weisheit’s parents, his sister, defense attorney Joe Perkovich and a Capital Chronicle reporter, were allowed to view the chamber for about three minutes after the blinds opened at 12:34 a.m. The blinds closed at 12:37 a.m., eight minutes before the reported time of death. The Capital Chronicle wrote that Weisheit did not visibly move or open his eyes during that window and that witnesses could not see when an IV was placed or when the lethal injection began.

What witnesses could not see. A van carrying the five witnesses entered the prison gates at 10:48 p.m. Wednesday. They waited in a visiting room from 11:06 p.m. until 12:22 a.m., then reached the execution chamber building at 12:30 a.m. When the blinds opened, Weisheit was already on a gurney in a red jumpsuit, his left arm extended and restrained, a white sheet covering the lower half of his body. Deacon Brian Nosbusch, his spiritual adviser, stood over him and appeared to pray. At 12:37 a.m. Nosbusch made the sign of the cross and Deputy Warden Dawn Buss closed the blinds. Perkovich later said in the prison parking lot that he could not assess whether his client had been conscious. “I don’t know what I saw,” he said. DOC said Weisheit had no final words. His final meal was barbecue ribs from Texas Corral and Mountain Dew, according to the Capital Chronicle.

The crime. Weisheit was executed for the April 2010 house fire near Evansville that killed 8-year-old Alyssa Lynch and her 5-year-old brother, Caleb. Their mother, Lisa Lynch, was working an overnight shift and had left the children in his care. At his 2013 trial, moved from Evansville to Jeffersonville because of publicity, a jury found him guilty of murder and arson after about 90 minutes of deliberation, WLKY reported at the time. Weisheit testified and denied setting the fire, suggesting faulty electrical work. He admitted he stuffed a dish towel into Caleb’s mouth and duct-taped it before leaving the children alone about 1 a.m. Prosecutors sought and obtained a death sentence.

Clemency and final appeals. Gov. Mike Braun denied clemency on Monday after the Indiana Parole Board unanimously recommended against it, the Capital Chronicle reported. Lisa Lynch urged officials to uphold the death sentence. The children’s father, Steven Lynch, asked Braun to spare Weisheit, saying another death would not restore his children. On Wednesday the Indiana Supreme Court voted 3-2 to deny an emergency stay while Weisheit challenged the drugs and procedures in Marion Superior Court. Chief Justice Loretta Rush and Justice Christopher Goff dissented and would have granted a 10-day stay. Defense filings alleged improper drug procurement, storage problems and questions about staff qualifications for placing IV lines. A supplemental filing said the pharmacy supplying the drugs, Pharmaneek Inc., contributed $5,000 to Attorney General Todd Rokita’s campaign in June while on probation. Hours before the execution, Perkovich urged Braun to intervene and said scrutiny of Indiana’s drug purchases would continue.

Afterward. Braun said in a statement that Weisheit’s case had been reviewed repeatedly by state and federal courts since the 2013 conviction without the sentence being overturned. Rokita expressed sympathy for the children’s family and said he hoped the execution would bring some measure of peace. Weisheit’s death was the first of three U.S. executions scheduled for Thursday, CBS News reported, with Alabama set to execute Michael Taylor and Florida scheduled to execute Jesse Guardado later in the day. The Capital Chronicle’s account is the primary public record of what the personal witnesses saw inside the chamber.

Case 03 / 9Waco, TexasUnited States

Brandon Davis Sentenced to Life for Shooting Dustin Nobles Outside Bruceville-Eddy Home

Location: Bruceville-Eddy and Waco, McLennan County, Texas, United States

Legal status: Convicted of murder Nov. 3, 2026; sentenced to life in prison Nov. 4, 2026; eligible for parole after 30 years

The sentence. A McLennan County jury on Wednesday sentenced Brandon Michael Davis, 20, of Bruceville-Eddy to life in prison for the January 2025 shooting death of Dustin “Dusty” Ray Nobles, 38. KWTX reported that Davis must serve at least 30 years before he can seek parole. Jurors in Waco’s 54th State District Court had taken about 15 minutes on Tuesday to reject Davis’s self-defense claims and find him guilty of murder. On Wednesday they deliberated a little more than two hours on punishment after hearing that Davis had been placed on juvenile probation twice for assaulting his mother and father.

The shooting. Testimony in the three-day trial showed that in December 2024 Davis texted Nobles that he would shoot him if he came back to Davis’s property in the 1300 block of Old Moody Road or onto the road in front of the home. On Jan. 5, 2025, Nobles’s vehicle broke down in front of the house. Davis told his grandfather to go outside and tell Nobles to leave. Davis testified he gave Nobles 10 minutes to fix the vehicle and go. He then confronted Nobles with a .22-caliber rifle and said Nobles approached him aggressively with fists clenched. Davis shot Nobles in the chest. Witnesses testified that afterward Davis told Nobles to “make sure you die slow,” KWTX reported.

Punishment evidence. Kacy Phillips, a McLennan County juvenile probation officer, testified that in 2022 Davis was sent to a residential treatment center in Wylie while on juvenile probation. There he received substance abuse treatment, family therapy and anger management counseling after separate assaults on his parents. Prosecutors Alyssa Killin and Duncan Widmann told jurors that despite his youth Davis showed no remorse and that his violence had escalated quickly after probation. They asked for a life term. “Today is about protecting the community from the danger you now know exists,” Killin said, calling Davis calculating and saying he had planned the confrontation and waited for an opportunity.

The defense ask. Defense attorney Clay Thomas asked the jury for a 20-year sentence, saying it would let Davis pay for the crime and still have a life left afterward. KWTX reported that Davis had rejected a 40-year plea offer from the district attorney’s office before trial, an offer that would have made him eligible for parole after 20 years. The jury of six women and six men chose life instead.

What the record shows and what it does not. The KWTX account is the primary contemporaneous record opened for this card. A Waco Tribune-Herald URL returned a rate-limit response at fetch time, and an earlier KWTX guilt-story link returned 404, so those pages are not treated as sources here. The facts above track the Nov. 4 KWTX sentencing report: the text warning, the broken-down vehicle, the rifle, the chest wound, the “die slow” remark attributed to witnesses, the juvenile probation history, the rejected plea and the life sentence with a 30-year parole floor.

Community stakes. Nobles and Davis already had a history of run-ins before the fatal night, KWTX reported. The December text message made the threat explicit weeks before the shooting. At trial the state framed the case as a planned confrontation rather than a sudden panic at a broken-down car. The defense framed it as a young man defending his home against an aggressive approach. The jury rejected self-defense in minutes on guilt and then, after hearing the juvenile record, chose the life ceiling prosecutors sought rather than the 20 years the defense asked for or the 40-year deal Davis had turned down.

Case 05 / 9Nivelles, BelgiumBelgium

Nicolas Ullens Sentenced to 12 Years for Assassinat of Myriam Lechien

Location: Nivelles (Brabant wallon) and Lasne, Belgium

Legal status: Convicted of assassinat; sentenced Nov. 4, 2026, to 12 years in prison; immediate arrest not ordered

The sentence. The cour d’assises du Brabant wallon in Nivelles on Wednesday sentenced Nicolas Ullens to 12 years in prison for the assassinat of his mother-in-law, Myriam Lechien, who was shot six times outside her property in Lasne on March 29, 2023. La Libre and RTBF reported the verdict after about six hours of deliberation on penalty. The court did not order his immediate arrest, La Libre wrote. With the mitigating circumstance of no prior convictions, the available range for assassinat ran from 3 to 30 years. The gap between the parties was wide: avocat général Laure Wynants had sought 25 years; defence counsel Quentin Mayence had asked for five years with probation (sursis).

Civil parties react. Lawyers for Lechien’s children and sister called the 12 year term far too light. Laurent Kennes, for the children, denounced what he called “class justice” and said that if Ullens had carried another name, had fewer means and come from another social milieu, he would have received a much heavier sentence for the same facts. He did welcome the written motives, which state that Myriam Lechien is responsible for nothing and is exclusively a victim, and which describe Ullens’s defence posture toward her as particularly shocking. Gilles Vanderbeck, also for the children, said he was very surprised by the leniency and that the mitigating circumstances justified such a soft penalty only weakly. Marko Obradovic, for Lechien’s sister, called the sentence absolutely derisory relative to the gravity of the facts while saluting motives that undercut the accused’s version.

How the case reached this day. Ullens had already been found guilty of assassinat. Wednesday’s hearing was the penalty phase after a month-long suspension of the debates, La Libre reported in its preview. RTBF coverage of the requisitions noted that Vanderbeck had earlier called the prosecution’s 25 year ask reasonable and the defence’s five year probation request audacious, and that he questioned the sincerity of Ullens’s expressed regrets, saying they had not been matched by concrete gestures toward the victim’s family during pre-trial detention or electronic monitoring.

What 12 years means here. Belgian assize sentencing is not a U.S.-style life tariff. Twelve years sits near the middle of the statutory band once mitigation for a clean record is applied, yet far below what the prosecution and the civil parties sought. The motives, as summarized by Kennes, rehabilitate Lechien’s memory while the quantum leaves her relatives unpersuaded. Whether Ullens serves the term in detention or under some later form of release will be decided under Belgian sentence-execution rules, not by this card. The conviction for assassinat, the six shots in Lasne on March 29, 2023, the 12 year prison sentence pronounced in Nivelles on Nov. 4, 2026, and the refusal to order immediate arrest are the concrete legal facts reported across La Libre and RTBF.

Lasne to Nivelles. The shooting happened at Lechien’s property in Lasne on March 29, 2023. The penalty was fixed in Nivelles on Nov. 4, 2026. Between those dates came a full assize trial on guilt, a finding of assassinat, a month-long pause in the debates and a penalty hearing in which the prosecution and the defence stood almost at opposite ends of the scale. Twelve years is the number the court and jury chose. The civil parties’ on-record reaction, preserved by La Libre, is that the number does not match either the motives’ severity or the usual practice in comparable cases. That disagreement is part of the public record of the day.

Case 07 / 9CanberraAustralia

High Court Reinstates Michael O’Connell’s Murder Conviction for Killing Former Partner

Location: Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia (High Court of Australia)

Legal status: Murder conviction restored by the High Court Nov. 4, 2026; earlier appeal acquittal set aside

The ruling. Australia’s High Court on Tuesday reinstated the murder conviction of Canberra man Michael O’Connell for killing his former partner by throwing her from the bonnet of a car, ABC News, the Canberra Times and Region Canberra reported. An earlier appeal had overturned the conviction. The High Court restored it. The decision is a final appellate step on guilt in the national court, not a fresh trial.

How she died. The Canberra Times summarized the facts underlying the conviction: O’Connell killed his former partner by throwing her from the bonnet of a vehicle. ABC’s headline framed the same core result as a Canberra man’s murder conviction reinstated by the High Court. Region Canberra likewise reported that the High Court reinstated the murder conviction for the man who killed his former partner. The victim’s full name and the precise date of the killing are taken only as far as those opened pages state them; where a page is thin on biography, this card does not invent detail.

Why the High Court mattered. In Australia, a state or territory conviction can be set aside on appeal and then restored if the prosecution wins in the High Court. That is what happened here. The practical effect is that O’Connell again stands convicted of murder. Sentence consequences follow the restored conviction under ACT criminal procedure. The Canberra Times story of Nov. 4, 2026, is titled around the restored conviction for the killing by throwing the victim from a bonnet, which anchors the mechanism of death in a mainstream capital-city report.

Source limits. One Canberra Times URL returned 404 at fetch and is not used. The working Canberra Times URL, ABC and Region Canberra are the three pages opened and relied on. Where those pages summarize rather than reprint the full High Court reasons, this card stays with the summary: conviction reinstated, prior appeal outcome displaced, killing by throwing the victim from a vehicle bonnet. Readers who need the doctrinal holding should read the High Court judgment itself when published on the court’s site.

What this Ledger records. On Nov. 4, 2026, the High Court of Australia reinstated Michael O’Connell’s murder conviction in a Canberra case. The conviction had been overturned on an earlier appeal. The killing involved throwing his former partner from a car bonnet. Those points are consistent across ABC, the Canberra Times and Region Canberra. Anything beyond them, including contested appellate reasoning not quoted in those reports, is left for the judgment text.

National court, local crime. Canberra cases rarely climb to the High Court. When they do, the holding binds every Australian jurisdiction on the point of law decided. For the Ledger, the immediate fact is simpler and harder: a murder conviction that had been taken away on appeal is back. O’Connell again stands convicted of murdering his former partner. The bonnet mechanism of death, reported by the Canberra Times, is part of how the public understands the crime. Sentence administration and any further applications are for the ACT courts and corrections authorities under the restored conviction. This card stops at the High Court’s reported restoration on Nov. 4, 2026.

Case 09 / 9Auckland, New ZealandNew Zealand

Four Teens Guilty of Manslaughter and Aggravated Robbery in Kyle Whorrall Killing

Location: Meadowbank and Auckland High Court, Auckland, New Zealand

Legal status: Four teens convicted Nov. 5, 2026, of manslaughter and aggravated robbery; not guilty of murder; a fifth teen had already pleaded guilty to murder and aggravated robbery; accused teens not named in sources

The verdicts. A High Court jury in Auckland on Thursday found four teenagers guilty of manslaughter and aggravated robbery in the death of American PhD student Kyle Whorrall, and not guilty of murder, RNZ reported. The four had pleaded not guilty to murder and aggravated robbery and had been on trial for about three weeks. A fifth teenager had already pleaded guilty to murder and aggravated robbery before the trial. The four who stood trial are not named in the RNZ account opened for this card. New Zealand practice often withholds identifying details for young defendants; this Ledger follows the sources and leaves them unnamed.

How Whorrall died. Whorrall was killed during a robbery at a bus stop in Auckland’s Meadowbank on April 19, 2025. Crown lawyer Henry Steele told the jury in closing that the group of teens had driven up and down St Johns Road for about five minutes while forming a plan to rob Whorrall. Two of them got out of the car, one armed with a machete. “They took his wallet and they left him with a catastrophic and ultimately fatal wound to the top of his head,” Steele said. He argued it was obvious to each of the five occupants that the machete could be used that way.

The defence splits. Paul Borich KC, for one defendant, said there was no evidence identifying his client, or any other specific defendant, as the second person out of the car. He told jurors that legitimate arguments could place any of the four in that role depending on which parts of the evidence they accepted. The Crown said Borich’s client and another teen, represented by Panama Le’Au’Anae, had a propensity for robbery with a machete. Le’Au’Anae’s client had not admitted being in the car; the Crown placed him at the scene with phone location data. The other two boys, represented by Annabel Maxwell-Scott and Marie Taylor-Cyphers, did not share that propensity, the Crown said. Maxwell-Scott disputed that her client was part of any robbery plan and said the machete attack was a spur of the moment decision by the fifth teen, already convicted. She argued her client could not have been the second person out of the car because eyewitness evidence suggested that person was shorter and her client is taller.

How the jury was directed. Justice Simon Mount warned jurors against guilt by association and told them to consider each defendant and each charge separately. Deliberations began at 3:20 p.m. Wednesday. Each of the four faced murder and aggravated robbery, and each charge carried possible lesser verdicts of manslaughter and robbery. The jury’s path was to convict on manslaughter and aggravated robbery while acquitting on murder. That means the jury accepted participation in a fatal robbery but did not accept the murder pathway the Crown sought against these four.

What comes next. Sentencing of the four will follow under New Zealand youth and High Court procedure. The fifth teen’s prior guilty pleas to murder and aggravated robbery already separate that defendant’s path. Whorrall, an American doctoral student, remains the named victim at the center of the case. Stuff’s matching URL returned a gone status at fetch time, so this card relies on the RNZ report opened today. The convictions for manslaughter and aggravated robbery, the murder acquittals, the Meadowbank bus stop killing on April 19, 2025, and the unnamed status of the four teens are the facts this Ledger records.

Browse every edition in the Crime Ledger Index