·

Tiananmen Square Massacre (1989): The True Story of Protest & China’s Deadly Crackdown

The events of Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989, reverberated beyond its borders and into history. The violent crackdown on pro-democracy protesters seemed to be a decisive moment in China's relationship with the democratic world. Three decades later, the ripple effects of that day are still being felt. Despite the ruling Communist Party's efforts to censor any discussion of the incident, the legacy of Tiananmen Square haunts the present, both in China and abroad.
Start
by 28/04/2025
1.6K views
16 mins read

Introduction

The spring of 1989 witnessed a pivotal moment in modern Chinese history as large-scale protests, primarily led by students, converged on Tiananmen Square in Beijing.1 These demonstrations, demanding political and economic reforms, culminated in a violent military crackdown on June 3-4, an event often referred to as the Tiananmen Square Massacre or the June Fourth Incident.2 This period of unrest and its brutal suppression had profound and lasting consequences, reshaping China’s political landscape, its approach to dissent, and its relationship with the international community.3 Understanding the causes, events, and enduring legacy of 1989 is crucial for comprehending contemporary China.

Seeds of Discontent: China in the 1980s

The protests of 1989 did not arise spontaneously but were rooted in the complex socio-economic and political environment of the preceding decade.3 Deng Xiaoping’s “Reform and Opening Up” policies, initiated in the late 1970s, had spurred significant economic growth but also created deep societal fissures and political tensions.3

Economic Reforms and Social Strains

Deng’s reforms moved China away from Maoist ideological purity towards economic modernization, involving agricultural de-collectivization, allowance for private enterprise, and foreign investment.3 While these changes lifted millions from poverty, they also generated significant social problems.3 Rising inflation eroded the purchasing power of urban residents.2 Corruption and nepotism became widespread as officials exploited the new economic opportunities.3 Growing income inequality fueled resentment 3, and the partial dismantling of the state welfare system (the “iron rice bowl”) created job insecurity, particularly for educated youth.3 These tangible hardships contributed significantly to the widespread discontent that surfaced in 1989.3

Limited Political Opening and Conservative Backlash

The 1980s saw a degree of political relaxation compared to the Mao era, with a more open intellectual and cultural environment.1 Exposure to Western ideas about democracy and individual rights increased, especially among students and intellectuals.1 However, this liberalization was strictly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).1 When student demonstrations in 1986 called for greater freedoms, the party leadership responded with the conservative Anti-Bourgeois Liberalization Campaign in 1987.1 This campaign aimed to curb perceived Western influences and reassert party control.8

The Significance of Hu Yaobang

A key figure affected by the 1987 conservative backlash was Hu Yaobang, the CCP General Secretary known for his reformist stance and relative tolerance.1 His forced resignation in January 1987 signaled the Party’s resistance to fundamental political change, frustrating those who hoped reforms would extend beyond the economy.1 When Hu died suddenly of a heart attack on April 15, 1989, he was transformed into a martyr for political liberalization.1 His provided the catalyst for the protests, as mourning became a vehicle for expressing broader discontent and demanding the reforms he symbolized.1

The Spring of 1989: A Movement Unfolds

Beginning as spontaneous gatherings to mourn Hu Yaobang, the events of spring 1989 rapidly evolved into a large-scale movement demanding significant political and social change, spreading across China.1

From Mourning to Protest: The Initial Weeks

Following Hu Yaobang’s death on April 15, thousands of students gathered in Tiananmen Square, initially to mourn.12 Posters appeared on university campuses praising Hu and calling for a reassessment of his legacy.9 This mourning quickly transformed into broader protests demanding political reform, an end to corruption, and greater freedoms.1 On April 22, the day of Hu’s official funeral, tens of thousands of students assembled in the Square, demanding dialogue with leaders like Premier Li Peng.2 The movement grew, spreading to other cities and universities.3

Composition and Demands of the Protesters

While often termed a “student movement,” the protests involved a diverse coalition of urban society.1 University students from institutions like Peking University and Beijing Normal University were central organizers 3, but they were joined by intellectuals, workers concerned about inflation and job security, journalists seeking press freedom, civil servants, and ordinary citizens.1 By mid-May, estimates suggest over a million people participated in Beijing demonstrations.1

Their demands, though varied, centered on key themes 3:

  • Ending official corruption and nepotism.1
  • Greater democracy and political reform.1
  • Guaranteed freedoms of speech, press, and assembly.1
  • Government accountability and dialogue.3
  • Addressing economic issues like inflation.3
  • Specific demands included reassessing Hu Yaobang’s legacy, increasing education funding, and lifting restrictions on demonstrations.1

Key Tactics: Hunger Strikes and the Goddess of Democracy

The movement employed various tactics, including marches, sit-ins, and class boycotts.3 A pivotal moment came on May 13, when hundreds of students began a hunger strike in Tiananmen Square to pressure the government for dialogue.1 This act garnered immense public sympathy and swelled the number of protesters in the Square.3 Another powerful symbol emerged on May 30 with the erection of the “Goddess of Democracy” statue, facing Mao Zedong’s portrait on the Tiananmen Gate.2

The CCP Response: Division and Decision

The Chinese Communist Party leadership grappled with how to respond to the escalating protests, revealing deep internal divisions before ultimately opting for suppression.3

The April 26 Editorial and Escalation

A critical turning point was the April 26 People’s Daily editorial, titled “It is necessary to take a clear-cut stand against disturbances”.3 Reflecting the hardline views of Deng Xiaoping and Premier Li Peng 3, the editorial condemned the student movement as “turmoil” (动乱) and a “planned ” aimed at overthrowing the CCP and the socialist system.1 This inflammatory language, reminiscent of the Cultural Revolution 3, backfired dramatically. Instead of intimidating protesters, it provoked widespread anger, leading to an even larger demonstration on April 27 and making the editorial’s retraction a central, non-negotiable demand of the movement.3 The editorial significantly hardened positions on both sides.3

Dialogue Attempts and the Leadership Split (Zhao vs. Li/Deng)

Despite the editorial, some attempts at dialogue occurred but failed due to government intransigence on core issues.3 The student hunger strike, beginning May 13, dramatically increased pressure and public support.1 The situation was further complicated by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev’s state visit (May 15-18), which was disrupted by the protests, causing international embarrassment for the leadership.1

Internally, the split between moderates and hardliners deepened.2 General Secretary Zhao Ziyang advocated for dialogue and concessions, affirming the students’ patriotism.2 His emotional visit to hunger strikers on May 19 was his last public act before being purged.3 The hardline faction, led by Premier Li Peng and backed by paramount leader Deng Xiaoping, viewed the protests as an intolerable threat to stability and CCP rule.2 Deng, holding ultimate authority, especially over the military as Chairman of the Central Military Commission 3, sided with the hardliners.

Martial Law and Failed Enforcement

The decision to impose martial law was made on May 17 at a meeting convened by Deng, overruling Zhao’s objections.3 Martial law was publicly declared in parts of Beijing by Li Peng on May 20.2 However, the initial attempt by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to enter the city was peacefully blocked by massive crowds of citizens who surrounded military vehicles.2 This popular resistance was seen as a humiliation by the leadership, further solidifying their resolve to use force.3 Zhao Ziyang was subsequently removed from power.1

The June 3-4 Crackdown

With political avenues exhausted and the hardliners firmly in control, the CCP leadership ordered a military operation to clear Tiananmen Square and suppress the protests by force.3

The Military Advance and Violence in Beijing

On the night of June 3, tens of thousands of heavily armed PLA troops, along with tanks and armored personnel carriers (APCs), advanced on central Beijing from several directions.1 When citizens again attempted to block their path, soldiers responded with lethal force.1 Numerous eyewitness accounts document indiscriminate firing with automatic weapons into crowds of unarmed protesters and bystanders, particularly along the western approach on Chang’an Avenue in areas like Muxidi and Fuxingmen.2 Tanks crushed barricades and people.20 Hospitals were overwhelmed with gunshot victims, and reports indicate soldiers attacked medical personnel and fired into residential buildings.2 Much of the killing occurred on the streets leading to the Square.20

Clearing Tiananmen Square: Contested Accounts

By the early morning of June 4, troops surrounded Tiananmen Square.21 Accounts of the violence within the Square during the final clearing differ. Some sources suggest the remaining students negotiated a peaceful withdrawal around dawn.2 However, other compelling testimonies describe soldiers firing towards the Monument to the People’s Heroes, APCs crushing tents (potentially occupied), and executions of protesters after the main group left.20 Sporadic gunfire continued around the Square during June 4.2

Casualty Estimates: A Contested Truth

The exact death toll remains unknown and highly contested, due to official censorship and the lack of an independent investigation.2

Table: Comparative Overview of Tiananmen Massacre Casualty Estimates (June 1989)

Source TypeReported Deaths (Civilians)Reported Deaths (Soldiers)Reported Injuries (Civilians)Notes/Context
Official PRC Gov’t (June 1989)~200–300 (incl. 36 students) 19“Several dozen” 20>3,000 10Widely considered an underestimate 2
Chinese Red Cross (Initial Rpt)2,600 3Not specified10,000 3Reportedly stated on June 4; later denied by the organization 3
Amnesty InternationalAt least 1,000 3~16 20Not specifiedBased on compiled information and testimonies 3
Western Media/DiplomatsHundreds to several thousand 1Not specifiedThousands 3Based on contemporary reports, hospital sources, eyewitnesses 1
UK Diplomatic Cable (Initial)Minimum 10,000 3Not specifiedNot specifiedDeclassified cable; Ambassador later revised estimate lower to 2,700-3,400 3
Tiananmen Mothers202 (identified by Aug 2011) 8N/ANot specifiedOngoing effort by victims’ families; face 2

The vast discrepancies reflect the chaos, deliberate obfuscation, and the ongoing struggle by groups like the Tiananmen Mothers to document the victims.2

The Tank Man Incident

On June 5, the day after the Square was cleared, an unidentified man carrying shopping bags famously stood alone, blocking a column of tanks on Chang’an Avenue.2 This image of defiance, known as “Tank Man,” became a global symbol of the protests.2 His identity and fate remain unconfirmed.41

Aftermath: Repression and Resistance

The military crackdown initiated a period of intense nationwide repression aimed at eliminating dissent and controlling the narrative, alongside acts of resistance and escape.3

Nationwide Crackdown: Arrests, Trials, and Executions

Following June 4, authorities launched a massive crackdown across China.3 Tens of thousands were arrested 1, including students, workers, and intellectuals identified from wanted lists or suspected of involvement.1 Many faced charges like “counter-revolutionary crimes,” subjected to unfair trials, and received harsh sentences, including long imprisonment and execution.1 Reports of torture and ill-treatment in detention were widespread.23 A political purge also removed CCP officials sympathetic to the protests, consolidating hardline control.1

Erasing History: Censorship and Information Control

The government implemented immediate and long-lasting censorship to control information and erase the memory of Tiananmen.1 Domestic media broadcast only the official narrative of suppressing “rioters”.1 Foreign media faced restrictions.3 Over the long term, Tiananmen became a taboo subject.2 The “Great Firewall” blocks foreign websites 3, and online searches and discussions related to June 4 are heavily censored, using keyword filters for terms like “Tiananmen,” “June 4,” “6/4,” or coded references like “May 35th”.1 Public commemoration is strictly forbidden in mainland China, and attempts to do so result in detention and prosecution.2 The once-large annual vigil in Hong Kong has been banned since 2020.2

Escape and Exile: Operation Yellowbird

Amidst the repression, a clandestine network known as Operation Yellowbird (黃雀行動) emerged to help wanted dissidents escape China, primarily via Hong Kong.2 Organized mainly by Hong Kong activists 12, with some contested claims of Western intelligence or diplomatic involvement 12, the operation used smugglers, speedboats, false documents, and safe houses.10 It successfully aided over 400 individuals, including prominent student leaders, in reaching safety overseas before ceasing operations around the 1997 Hong Kong handover.10 The operation highlighted Hong Kong’s then-unique status as a refuge.10

Enduring Legacy

The Tiananmen crackdown was a watershed event, profoundly shaping China’s subsequent political development, human rights practices, and international relations.3

Impact on Chinese Politics: Stability Above All

The CCP leadership viewed the 1989 protests as an existential threat, concluding that maintaining stability and absolute Party control was paramount.2 This led to the abandonment of political liberalization efforts.1 Instead, the Party adopted a strategy combining accelerated market-based economic reforms with tightened political repression – the “1989 Choice” or “strong on two fronts”.3 This model aimed to bolster legitimacy through economic growth while preventing any future challenges to CCP rule through enhanced security and control.2 The crackdown also fostered a climate of political fear and self-censorship within society.1 However, the core demands of 1989 for accountability and freedom continue to resonate, as seen in later protests like the 2022 “White Paper” movement.20

The Current Human Rights Landscape

The repressive apparatus solidified after 1989 continues and has intensified under Xi Jinping, utilizing advanced technology.12 Major ongoing concerns include:

  • Xinjiang: Mass arbitrary detention (over a million Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslims), forced labor, torture, surveillance, and cultural erasure, characterized by the UN and others as potential crimes against humanity.8
  • Tibet: Severe restrictions on religion, expression, and movement; policies seen as threatening Tibetan culture.8
  • Hong Kong: The imposition of the National Security Law (2020) and Article 23 (2024) has dismantled the city’s autonomy and freedoms, leading to arrests of activists, closure of independent media, and suppression of dissent, including Tiananmen commemorations.2
  • Nationwide Repression: Shrinking space for civil society; harassment, detention, and torture of human rights lawyers, journalists, feminists, labor activists, and religious groups.2
  • Surveillance and Censorship: Pervasive use of the Great Firewall, digital surveillance, big data, and social credit systems to monitor citizens and control information.1
  • Transnational Repression: Targeting critics and minorities overseas through intimidation, harassment, and pressure for repatriation.87

International Response and China’s Influence

The global reaction to Tiananmen and subsequent human rights issues has been shaped by China’s rise. Initially, Western nations condemned the crackdown and imposed sanctions, including arms embargoes and suspension of high-level exchanges.1 However, prioritizing economic engagement led to the gradual erosion of these pressures.2 China’s increased economic power now allows it to leverage trade and investment (e.g., Belt and Road Initiative) to discourage criticism and influence international bodies like the UN Human Rights Council.1 Beijing actively promotes alternative human rights narratives emphasizing sovereignty and development over civil liberties, challenging the universal human rights framework.1 Achieving accountability for Tiananmen remains difficult due to this influence.2 The UN response in 1989 was limited, citing non-interference principles.1

Conclusion: Remembering Tiananmen

The 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre stand as a stark reminder of the human cost of authoritarian repression and the enduring value of freedom, democracy, and human rights.19 The events marked a decisive turn in China’s path, prioritizing state control and economic development over political liberalization—a trajectory maintained and technologically enhanced to this day.2 Despite decades of censorship and denial by the Chinese government 1, the memory of Tiananmen persists as a symbol of resistance against oppression and a call for justice and accountability that continues to resonate globally.19

Works cited

  1. Tiananmen Square Protests: 1989, Massacre & Tank Man – History.com, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.history.com/articles/tiananmen-square
  2. Tiananmen Square incident | Massacre, Summary, Details, & Tank Man | Britannica, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/Tiananmen-Square-incident
  3. 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre
  4. What really happened in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests – Amnesty International, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org.uk/china-1989-tiananmen-square-protests-demonstration-massacre
  5. China’s True Legacy of 1989 – China Channel – Los Angeles Review of Books, accessed April 28, 2025, https://chinachannel.lareviewofbooks.org/2019/06/07/6-4-legacy/
  6. China’s 1989 Choice: the Paradox of Seeking Wealth and Democracy | Wilson Quarterly, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/summer-2014-1989-and-the-making-of-our-modern-world/chinas-1989-choice-paradox-seeking-wealth-and-democracy
  7. Causes and events of the Tiananmen Square protests | History of Modern China Class Notes | Fiveable, accessed April 28, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/history-modern-china/unit-16/events-tiananmen-square-protests/study-guide/xnJbYqXhvbHgTGYW
  8. Tiananmen Square, 1989 | University Library, accessed April 28, 2025, https://library.indianapolis.iu.edu/digitalcollections/TS
  9. Death of Hu Yaobang – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Hu_Yaobang
  10. Tiananmen Square, 1989 – Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations – Office of the Historian, accessed April 28, 2025, https://history.state.gov/milestones/1989-1992/tiananmen-square
  11. The Politics of Space within Tiananmen Square, 1989 – CSUSB ScholarWorks, accessed April 28, 2025, https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=history-in-the-making
  12. Timeline: What Led to the Tiananmen Square Massacre | FRONTLINE – PBS, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/timeline-tiananmen-square/
  13. 100,000 Chinese students gather at Tiananmen Square, demand to meet Li Peng | April 22, 1989 | HISTORY, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/april-22/chinese-students-begin-protests-at-tiananmen-square
  14. The Forgotten Socialists of Tiananmen Square – Jacobin, accessed April 28, 2025, https://jacobin.com/2019/06/tiananmen-square-worker-organization-socialist-democracy
  15. The Tiananmen Military Coup d’État of 1989: A Neglected Aspect of History from a – Comparative-Politics Perspective, accessed April 28, 2025, https://icaps.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/CCPS5(2)-Wu.pdf
  16. 30 Years After Tiananmen: The Meaning of June 4th | Journal of Democracy, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/30-years-after-tiananmen-the-meaning-of-june-4th/
  17. Reactions to the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_the_1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre
  18. China: the massacre of June 1989 and its aftermath – Amnesty International, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa17/009/1990/en/
  19. What is the Tiananmen crackdown? – Amnesty International, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2024/06/what-is-the-tiananmen-crackdown/
  20. www.amnesty.org, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/asa170091990en.pdf
  21. A Brief Chronology of Events at Tiananmen Square (1989) – Asia for Educators, accessed April 28, 2025, https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/special/china_1950_tiananmen_timeline.htm
  22. Eyewitness Account of the Tiananmen Massacre by a Student Survivor (June 4, 1989), accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2753/CLG0009-4609230194
  23. April 26 Editorial – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_26_Editorial
  24. The April 26 Editorial – 六四記憶‧人權博物館, accessed April 28, 2025, https://8964museum.com/time/en/t-d13-002/
  25. April 26, 1989: A government editorial seals the fate of Beijing’s student protesters, accessed April 28, 2025, https://thechinaproject.com/2021/04/28/april-26-1989-a-government-editorial-seals-the-fate-of-beijings-student-protesters/
  26. Beijing Spring and the Lead-up to Tiananmen Square – ADST.org, accessed April 28, 2025, https://adst.org/2016/05/beijing-spring-lead-tiananmen-square/
  27. June 4, 1989: A personal recollection – Brookings Institution, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/june-4-1989-a-personal-recollection/
  28. The Chinese pro-Democracy Movement: 1987-1989 | ICNC, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/chinese-pro-democracy-movement-1987-1989/
  29. Inspiring, Thrilling, and Confused – City Journal, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.city-journal.org/article/new-novel-retells-the-story-of-tiananmen-square
  30. (PDF) Cold Case: Re-investigate the group dynamics of the CCP leadership in the 1989 Tiananmen incident – ResearchGate, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315696803_Cold_Case_Re-investigate_the_group_dynamics_of_the_CCP_leadership_in_the_1989_Tiananmen_incident
  31. Hu Yaobang – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hu_Yaobang
  32. The U.S. Tiananmen Papers – The National Security Archive, accessed April 28, 2025, https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB47/index2.html
  33. Zhao Ziyang – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhao_Ziyang
  34. The Tiananmen Papers – Wellesley College, accessed April 28, 2025, http://academics.wellesley.edu/Polisci/wj/China/Tiananmen/tampapers.html
  35. Eternal agony in my heart: A new eyewitness account of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre, accessed April 28, 2025, https://hongkongfp.com/2016/06/04/eternal-agony-in-my-heart-a-new-eyewitness-account-of-the-1989-tiananmen-massacre/
  36. A Tiananmen Square Massacre Victim Qi Zhiyong’s First Hand Oral Account, accessed April 28, 2025, https://new.hrichina.org/current/qi-zhiyong-first-hand-oral-account
  37. Beijing Spring: An Eyewitness Account – Dissent Magazine, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/beijing-spring-an-eyewitness-account/
  38. The Tiananmen Legacy – Human Rights Watch, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/The%20Tiananmen%20Legacy_3.pdf
  39. There Was No “Tiananmen Square Massacre” – CBS News, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/there-was-no-tiananmen-square-massacre/
  40. China: Closing Off Memory of Tiananmen Massacre | Human Rights Watch, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/06/02/china-closing-memory-tiananmen-massacre
  41. How Many Really Died? Tiananmen Square Fatalities | TIME, accessed April 28, 2025, https://time.com/archive/6715033/how-many-really-died-tiananmen-square-fatalities/
  42. Remembering Tiananmen Square – Congressman Frank Lucas, accessed April 28, 2025, https://lucas.house.gov/posts/remembering-tiananmen-square
  43. China: U.S. Economic Sanctions – EveryCRSReport.com, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/96-272.html
  44. Remembering the Tiananmen Square Crackdown, and the “Tank Man” | FRONTLINE – PBS, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/remembering-the-tiananmen-square-crackdown-and-the-tank-man/
  45. Human Rights Activism in Post-Tiananmen China, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/05/30/human-rights-activism-post-tiananmen-china
  46. Operation Yellowbird Archives – Shoeleather Magazine – NYU Journalism, accessed April 28, 2025, https://sites.nyujournalism.org/shoeleather2020-wp/tag/operation-yellowbird/
  47. 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: China (Includes Hong Kong, Macau, and Tibet) – State Department, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/china/
  48. CHINA 2023 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT – State Department, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/528267_CHINA-2023-HUMAN-RIGHTS-REPORT.pdf
  49. How psy-ops warriors fooled me about Tiananmen Square: a warning – Fridayeveryday, accessed April 28, 2025, https://fridayeveryday.com/how-psy-ops-warriors-fooled-me-about-tiananmen-square-a-warning/
  50. 25 years later, Tiananmen Square massacre remains unspoken tragedy in China – PBS, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/classroom/daily-videos/2023/08/25-years-later-tiananmen-square-massacre-remains-unspoken-tragedy-in-china
  51. Tiananmen at 35: The Ongoing Struggle for Human Rights and Democracy in China | CECC, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.cecc.gov/events/hearings/tiananmen-at-35%E2%80%94the-ongoing-struggle-for-human-rights-and-democracy-in-china
  52. Remembrance and Legal Implications of 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre – Grungo Law, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.grungolaw.com/remembrance-and-legal-implications-of-1989-tiananmen-square-massacre/
  53. After Hong Kong crackdown, overseas tributes help keep Tiananmen memories alive – PBS, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/after-hong-kong-crackdown-overseas-tributes-help-keep-tiananmen-memories-alive
  54. UN ‘Alarmed’ by Hong Kong’s Tiananmen Anniversary Detentions; Government Condemns ‘Smearing’ of Police – VOA, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.voanews.com/a/hong-kong-activists-detained-amid-tiananmen-square-anniversary/7123663.html
  55. Reform and opening up – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_and_opening_up
  56. Operation Yellowbird – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Yellowbird
  57. Operation Yellow Bird – The Dui Hua Foundation, accessed April 28, 2025, https://duihua.org/operation-yellow-bird/
  58. Watch Operation Yellow Bird | Prime Video – Amazon.com, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Operation-Yellow-Bird-Jean-Pierre-Montagne/dp/B078MHRVWF
  59. Operation Yellow Bird : the fascinating exfiltration of the Tiananmen dissidents – University of Southern California – USC Libraries Search, accessed April 28, 2025, https://uosc.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991042603497303731/01USC_INST:01USC
  60. Opération Yellow Bird (TV Movie 2016) – IMDb, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10418756/
  61. The Backlash to China’s Zero-COVID Policy – CNA.org., accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.cna.org/centers-and-divisions/cna/cip/china-studies/covid-and-china
  62. 1989 with Chinese Characteristics | German Marshall Fund of the United States, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.gmfus.org/news/1989-chinese-characteristics
  63. China: Freedom in the World 2023 Country Report, accessed April 28, 2025, https://freedomhouse.org/country/china/freedom-world/2023
  64. China: Freedom on the Net 2024 Country Report, accessed April 28, 2025, https://freedomhouse.org/country/china/freedom-net/2024
  65. World Report 2020: China’s Global Threat to Human Rights, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/global
  66. China: No Letup in Repression – Human Rights Watch, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/01/16/china-no-letup-repression
  67. World Report 2025: China | Human Rights Watch, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/china
  68. FREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2024, accessed April 28, 2025, https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/FIW_2024_DigitalBooklet.pdf
  69. China: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report, accessed April 28, 2025, https://freedomhouse.org/country/china/freedom-world/2024
  70. Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy | Congress.gov, accessed April 28, 2025, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R48288/2
  71. At the U.N., China is deploying a growing army of puppet organizations to monitor and intimidate human rights activists – ICIJ, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.icij.org/investigations/china-targets/united-nations-ngo-gongo-intimidate-human-rights/
  72. World Report 2024: China | Human Rights Watch, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/china
  73. Human rights in China – Amnesty International, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/east-asia/china/report-china/
  74. Beijing’s BRI influence over the UN Human Rights Council | East Asia Forum, accessed April 28, 2025, https://eastasiaforum.org/2023/01/19/beijings-bri-influence-over-the-un-human-rights-council/
  75. Information Suppression and Dissent in China in the Context of the Chinese Government’s Zero-COVID Policy – CECC.gov, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.cecc.gov/sites/evo-subsites/cecc.house.gov/files/documents/Cook%20-%20CECC%20written%20testimony-%2011.10.pdf
  76. Tiananmen Square crackdown and international criticism of China, accessed April 28, 2025, https://whatchinasays.org/key-events/tiananmen-square-crackdown-and-international-criticism-of-china/
  77. Hong Kong: Article 23 law used to ‘normalize’ repression one year since enactment, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/03/hong-kong-article-23-law-used-to-normalize-repression-one-year-since-enactment/
  78. Hong Kong: New Security Law Full-Scale Assault on Rights | Human Rights Watch, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/19/hong-kong-new-security-law-full-scale-assault-rights
  79. Hong Kong: Passing of Article 23 law a devastating moment for human rights, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/03/hong-kong-passing-of-article-23-law-a-devastating-moment-for-human-rights/
  80. Hong Kong lawmakers unanimously approve security law giving government more power to curb dissent – AP News, accessed April 28, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/hong-kong-china-legislative-council-national-security-law-37e1aca2daef8a4f9f998f389ff3d7f5
  81. Hong Kong’s Freedoms: What China Promised and How It’s Cracking Down, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/hong-kong-freedoms-democracy-protests-china-crackdown
  82. Dialogue – Issue 38: Tiananmen Sanctions: 20 Years & Counting – The Dui Hua Foundation, accessed April 28, 2025, https://duihua.org/dialogue-issue-38-tiananmen-sanctions-20-years-counting/
  83. Dissidents in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissidents_in_the_1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre
  84. COVID-19 Lockdowns Censored, Xi Jinping , Netizens IP Locations Revealed (May 2022) | Freedom House, accessed April 28, 2025, https://freedomhouse.org/report/china-media-bulletin/2025/covid-19-lockdowns-censored-xi-jinping-propaganda-netizens-ip
  85. China’s Censors Aim to Contain Dissent During Harsh COVID-19 Lockdowns | Opinion, accessed April 28, 2025, https://freedomhouse.org/article/chinas-censors-aim-contain-dissent-during-harsh-covid-19-lockdowns-opinion-0
  86. Circumvention of Censorship in China Has Increased During COVID-19 Pandemic, accessed April 28, 2025, https://luskin.ucla.edu/circumvention-of-censorship-in-china-has-increased-during-covid-19-pandemic
  87. China’s Influence on the Global Human Rights System, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/09/14/chinas-influence-global-human-rights-system
  88. United States sanctions against China – Wikipedia, accessed April 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_sanctions_against_China
  89. China’s long game on human rights at the United Nations – Brookings Institution, accessed April 28, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-long-game-on-human-rights-at-the-united-nations/
Previous Story

Clementine Barnabet: Confessed Axe Murderer or Historical Scapegoat?

Neon Logo
Go toTop

New Poison

Rostov Ripper

Rostov Ripper: Soviet Horror Story

Explore the chilling narrative of Andrei Chikatilo, the Soviet serial…

Criminal Report: The Magdalena Solis Case and the Yerba Buena Cult Killings

Explore the chilling case of Magdalena Solis, the "High Priestess…