Anatomy of a Verdict: An Analysis of the Trial of Taylor Schabusiness

The Green Bay Dismemberment Case

In the depths of American crime, certain cases stand out for their sheer brutality, challenging our understanding of human behaviour and testing the limits of the justice system. The murder of Shad Thyrion in Green Bay, Wisconsin, is unequivocally one such case. On February 23, 2022, a horrifying discovery in the basement of a quiet suburban home initiated an investigation that would uncover a crime of almost unimaginable depravity. The victim, 24-year-old Shad Thyrion, had been murdered, decapitated, and dismembered by his 25-year-old lover, Taylor Schabusiness. The initial discovery was made by Thyrion’s own mother, Tara Pakanich, who found her son’s severed head in a five-gallon bucket.

The investigation that followed revealed a grim narrative of a sexual encounter that spiraled into homicide, fueled by a potent cocktail of methamphetamine and prescription drugs. Schabusiness was quickly apprehended and confessed in chilling detail to strangling Thyrion, engaging in post-mortem sexual acts with his corpse, and then methodically dismembering his body with knives sourced from the home’s kitchen.

The case against her was swift and overwhelming, culminating in a two-phase trial in the Brown County Circuit Court. A jury first found her guilty of First-Degree Intentional Homicide, Mutilating a Corpse, and Third-Degree Sexual Assault with remarkable speed. In the second phase, the same jury just as quickly rejected her plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, finding her legally sane at the time of the crime.

The subsequent sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole, handed down by Judge Thomas Walsh, brought a legal conclusion to a case that he described as an offense against “human decency” itself. This report provides a comprehensive legal and forensic analysis of the Taylor Schabusiness trial. It will examine the chronology of the crime, the painstaking investigation and the powerful evidence presented, the legal strategies employed by both the prosecution and the defense, and the ultimate verdict and its implications. Through a meticulous review of the trial proceedings, this analysis seeks to construct a definitive account of how the justice system confronted and processed an act of violence that profoundly shocked the community and the nation.

The Crime: A Chronology of the Final Hours of Shad Thyrion

Relationship and Context

Before the events of February 2022, the relationship between Taylor Schabusiness and Shad Thyrion appeared, at least on the surface, unremarkable to some. They were known to be friends who had attended middle and high school together, and their connection had evolved into a sexual relationship. In testimony that would later stand in haunting contrast to the crime’s details, Thyrion’s father recalled his impression of Schabusiness as “polite”. This perception of normalcy belied the violent undercurrents and substance abuse that would ultimately define their final encounter.

The Descent into Violence (February 21-22, 2022)

The timeline of the murder, reconstructed primarily from Schabusiness’s own detailed confession to investigators, charts a course from a seemingly typical evening into a scene of unparalleled horror.

On the evening of February 21, 2022, at approximately 9:30 p.m., Schabusiness picked Thyrion up from his mother’s residence. They were joined by a friend and proceeded to an apartment where the group smoked cannabis. This initial phase of the evening, involving consensual social drug use, offered no clear indication of the violence to come. The dynamic shifted significantly after the friend departed.

According to Schabusiness’s interrogation, she and Thyrion escalated their substance use dramatically, smoking methamphetamine and injecting Trazodone, a prescription sedative. The decision to combine a powerful central nervous system stimulant with a potent sedative created a volatile and unpredictable neurochemical state. This combination is known to induce states of paranoia, disinhibition, and psychosis, and it served as the immediate backdrop for the homicide.

The couple then returned to the basement of Thyrion’s mother’s house, where they began to engage in sexual activity. Schabusiness told police that they had a history of incorporating erotic asphyxiation into their encounters and, on this night, used metal chains. At some point during this act, the encounter turned fatal. Schabusiness stated that she “went crazy” and continued to strangle Thyrion with the chain. She did not stop, even as he began to cough up blood and turn purple, maintaining the pressure for what she estimated to be three to five minutes, until he was deceased.

The prosecution’s case for intentional homicide was profoundly strengthened by a key admission she made to Green Bay Police Detective David Graf: when asked about the experience of strangling him, she confessed that “she liked it“. This statement was pivotal, as it framed the act not as an accident or a psychotic lapse, but as an intentional act committed for her own gratification.

Thyrion’s death did not end the night’s horrific events. Schabusiness admitted to investigators that she continued to perform sexual acts on his corpse for several hours, including oral sex and the use of sex toys. This act of necrophilia would form the basis for the separate charge of Third-Degree Sexual Assault.

The following morning, the scene escalated from homicide to methodical mutilation. Using various knives she found in the house’s kitchen, Schabusiness began to dismember Thyrion’s body. Her confession detailed a chillingly pragmatic approach to the gruesome task. She positioned his body on the bed and beheaded him over a bucket and a large storage tote, a deliberate measure to contain the blood flow. She later dumped the collected blood down a nearby shower drain. She then proceeded to eviscerate the torso, removing his internal organs and placing them into an assortment of containers, including plastic bags, cardboard boxes, and the same bucket that held his head.

The combination of intoxicants is critical to any analysis of Schabusiness’s mental state. The defense would later argue that this drug-fueled state triggered a latent mental illness or induced a temporary psychosis, rendering her incapable of understanding the nature of her actions. However, the prosecution successfully presented a counter-narrative. In their view, the drugs were not an excuse for her actions but a facilitator.

They served to lower her inhibitions, allowing her to act upon violent sexual fantasies that were already present. In this legal framework, the voluntary intoxication became part of the mens rea, or guilty mind, rather than a mitigating factor that negated it. Her admission of enjoyment and the methodical nature of her post-mortem actions strongly supported the prosecution’s argument that this was not a loss of control, but a depraved exertion of it.

Discovery and Investigation: A Scene of Unspeakable Horror

The Discovery (February 23, 2022)

The crime remained undiscovered for two days, concealed within the confines of the basement. The silence was broken in the early morning hours of February 23, 2022, when Tara Pakanich, Shad Thyrion’s mother, was awakened by the sound of a slamming door. Believing it might have been Schabusiness leaving, she went to investigate and noticed a light on in the basement. She descended the stairs to look for her son but could not find him.

As she turned to go back upstairs, she noticed a five-gallon bucket near the staircase, partially covered by a towel. Her curiosity turned to unimaginable horror when she lifted the towel and discovered the severed head of her son. In a state of shock, she alerted her boyfriend, Steve Hendricks, who immediately placed a call to 911, initiating a major homicide investigation.

Law Enforcement Response

The initial call dispatched officers from the Green Bay Police Department to a scene that none could have been prepared for. Officer Alex Wanish was among the first to arrive and would later provide crucial testimony about the initial moments of the investigation. He described making contact with the distraught residents, who directed him to the basement. He proceeded downstairs while his partner secured the upper level of the home. At the bottom of the stairs, he located the bucket.

“Just to verify we had an actual head in a bucket,” he testified, “lifted the towel off and there was in fact a human severed head in the bucket”.

Officer Alex Wanish

This moment, and the subsequent initial search of the basement, was captured on Officer Wanish’s body-worn camera. This footage became a central and profoundly disturbing piece of evidence for the prosecution. Presented to the jury during the trial, the video provided a raw, unfiltered view of the crime scene as law enforcement first encountered it. The footage documented not only the discovery of Thyrion’s head but also his severed penis, which had been placed in the bucket as well. The video served to transport the jury directly into the initial shock and gravity of the discovery, making the abstract horror of the crime undeniably real.

The Crime Scene

The subsequent forensic investigation, led by experienced detectives including Phillip Scanlan and David Graf, revealed that the horror was not confined to the bucket. The crime scene was distributed and meticulously, if incompletely, processed by the perpetrator.

In the basement, investigators found Thyrion’s torso inside a large storage tote. Other organs and body parts were found packaged in various plastic bags and cardboard boxes. Investigators noted the conspicuous lack of significant blood spatter in the main area of the basement, which suggested a deliberate and conscious effort by Schabusiness to contain the bleeding during the dismemberment and to clean the scene afterward. Several knives, believed to be the instruments of dismemberment, were recovered from different locations in the basement, including one found inside a Jimmy Choo designer bag.

The search extended beyond the house. Schabusiness’s gold Town and Country minivan was located at a nearby apartment complex. A search of the vehicle yielded still more of Thyrion’s remains. Inside a crock pot box in the van, police discovered one of the victim’s feet.

The Arrest

Later on the day of the discovery, police located Taylor Schabusiness at the same Eastman Avenue apartment complex. When they found her, her clothing was stained with what appeared to be blood. She also had fresh injuries, including a cut on her thumb and scratches on her arms, which she claimed were self-inflicted. She was taken into custody, and the investigative focus shifted from processing a crime scene to understanding the mind of its creator.

The nature of the crime scene provides a powerful counter-narrative to the defense’s later claims of an uncontrolled psychotic episode. A person experiencing a complete and disorganized psychotic break is unlikely to engage in the kind of sequential, goal-oriented tasks that the evidence suggests. The deliberate acts of using a bucket and tote to contain blood, packaging organs into separate containers, dumping blood down a drain, and transporting body parts to a vehicle for later disposal all point to a mind capable of planning and problem-solving.

These actions demonstrate a clear consciousness of guilt—an awareness that a crime had been committed and that its evidence needed to be concealed. This methodical approach, even if gruesome and ultimately unsuccessful, strongly implies a degree of rational thought that directly undermines a defense based on insanity. Her later admission to detectives that she intended to take all the body parts with her but “got lazy” further reinforces the idea of a volitional, rather than a pathological, state of mind.

The State’s Case: Building an Irrefutable Narrative

The prosecution, led by Brown County Assistant District Attorney Caleb Saunders, constructed a case against Taylor Schabusiness that was methodical, comprehensive, and ultimately irrefutable. The state’s strategy was not to simply prove that Schabusiness had killed Shad Thyrion—her own confession made that a foregone conclusion—but to prove that she had done so with intent, for the purpose of her own perverse gratification, and while in full possession of her legal faculties.

The Confession: A Chilling Recounting of Events

The cornerstone of the prosecution’s case was Schabusiness’s own words. Her detailed and voluntary confession to detectives following her arrest provided a complete narrative of the crime, leaving little room for doubt about the sequence of events. She admitted to every material fact of the charges against her: the strangulation, the post-mortem sexual assault, and the dismemberment. Critically, her statements went beyond a simple admission of the acts.

She provided the prosecution with a clear and legally potent motive when she described enjoying the act of strangulation and expressed a desire to keep all of Thyrion’s body parts as mementos. This admission allowed the prosecution to frame the motive as sexual gratification, a key element for securing a conviction on the charge of First-Degree Intentional Homicide.

Physical and Forensic Evidence

The confession was buttressed by a mountain of physical and forensic evidence. The various knives recovered from the basement, including one with a distinctive wooden handle, were presented to the jury as the weapons used in the mutilation. The dismembered remains of Shad Thyrion, recovered from the various containers in the basement and the minivan, were meticulously cataloged and presented as evidence of the “mutilating a corpse” charge.

The testimony of Dr. Vincent Tranchida, the Dane County Medical Examiner who performed the autopsy, was particularly devastating for the defense. Speaking with clinical precision, Dr. Tranchida confirmed that the cause of death was strangulation. He then provided the jury with a graphic and unforgettable account of the extent of the post-mortem mutilation. He described how Thyrion’s body had been decapitated and eviscerated, with most of his internal organs removed.

He testified that Thyrion’s back had been “filleted” and, in a detail that underscored the extreme nature of the desecration, that one of Thyrion’s feet had been severed and shoved into his own chest cavity. This expert testimony painted a picture of a methodical and brutal dissection that went far beyond a simple attempt to dispose of a body, shocking the conscience of the jury and reinforcing the depravity of the crime.

The Digital Trail and Psychological Underpinnings

To further dismantle the anticipated insanity defense, the prosecution introduced evidence of Schabusiness’s digital footprint. Investigators discovered that her internet search history included queries related to the notorious Wisconsin serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, who was also known for dismembering his victims. The state presented this evidence to suggest a pre-existing morbid fascination with the very acts she would later commit, arguing that her crime was not a spontaneous break from reality but rather the realization of a dark fantasy.

This narrative was reinforced by a photograph found showing Schabusiness lying next to her phone, which was displaying a picture of Dahmer. This connection allowed the prosecution to draw a powerful parallel between Schabusiness and a figure synonymous with calculated, sexually motivated murder, thereby contextualizing her actions as coherent and intentional, however monstrous.

Witness Testimony

The prosecution’s case was brought to life for the jury through the testimony of key witnesses. The first-person account from Officer Alex Wanish of discovering the severed head provided a harrowing, official corroboration of the crime scene’s horror. The methodical testimony of Detectives David Graf and Phillip Scanlan walked the jury through the investigation, from the initial 911 call to the detailed confession, laying out the evidence in a clear and logical progression.

Providing the emotional anchor to the entire proceeding was the testimony of Tara Pakanich. Her account of discovering her own son’s head in a bucket grounded the clinical and forensic details in the reality of profound human loss and tragedy, ensuring the jury never lost sight of the victim at the center of the case.

Table 1: Summary of Key Trial Testimony

The evidentiary phase of the trial relied on a range of witnesses to construct a comprehensive picture of the crime, the investigation, and the defendant’s state of mind. The following table summarizes the most pivotal testimonies and their strategic importance to the case.

The Trial – Phase I: The Question of Guilt (July 2023)

The trial of Taylor Schabusiness was bifurcated, or split into two distinct phases. The first phase, which commenced in July 2023, was concerned solely with the question of factual guilt. The jury was tasked with determining whether the prosecution had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Schabusiness had committed the acts for which she was charged.

The Charges

The state of Wisconsin brought three felony charges against Schabusiness:

1. First-Degree Intentional Homicide: This charge required the prosecution to prove that she caused the death of Shad Thyrion with the intent to kill.
2. Mutilating a Corpse: This charge addressed the acts of dismemberment and evisceration that occurred after Thyrion’s death.
3. Third-Degree Sexual Assault: This charge was based on her admission of performing sexual acts with Thyrion’s body after he was deceased, an act which constitutes sexual assault under Wisconsin law as a corpse cannot consent.

Prosecution’s Argument

The prosecution’s case in this phase was overwhelming and straightforward. Assistant District Attorney Caleb Saunders presented the jury with Schabusiness’s detailed confession, which was corroborated at every turn by the physical evidence. The location of the body parts, the presence of the knives, the forensic findings from the autopsy, and the testimony of the officers who processed the scene all aligned perfectly with her account. The state argued that her admission of enjoying the strangulation was direct evidence of her intent to kill, fulfilling the primary requirement for the first-degree homicide charge.

Defense’s Argument

Faced with an irrefutable body of evidence and a client who had confessed in detail, the defense, led by attorney Christopher Froelich, had an exceedingly difficult task. In this guilt phase, they could not yet introduce the full scope of their mental health defense. Their strategy was largely one of damage control. They cross-examined the state’s witnesses but could do little to challenge the fundamental facts of the case. They highlighted Schabusiness’s extensive drug use on the night of the murder, likely as a way to lay the groundwork for the subsequent sanity phase, but they could not offer a credible alternative theory of the crime.

The Verdict

On July 26, 2023, after the presentation of all the evidence, the case was handed to the jury. Their deliberation was stunningly brief. In less than one hour, the jury returned to the courtroom with a verdict: guilty on all three charges. The swiftness of the decision was a testament to the strength of the prosecution’s case. It signaled that the jury had no reasonable doubt that Taylor Schabusiness was the person who had killed, mutilated, and sexually assaulted Shad Thyrion. With the question of “what happened” settled, the trial moved into its second, more complex phase: the question of “why,” and whether Schabusiness was legally responsible for her actions.

The Trial – Phase II: The Sanity Defense

With Taylor Schabusiness’s factual guilt established, the trial immediately pivoted to its second phase. The same jury was now tasked with answering a different, more abstract legal question: was Schabusiness not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect at the time she committed the crime?. If the jury answered in the affirmative, she would be committed to a secure mental institution rather than sentenced to prison. This phase of the trial became a battle of expert psychological testimony, with the defense attempting to portray Schabusiness as a victim of her own broken mind, while the prosecution painted her as a manipulative and malevolent actor.

Defense Argument: A History of Mental Illness

The defense’s case for insanity was built on three pillars: expert testimony, a documented history of mental health struggles, and her erratic behavior.

The central figure for the defense was Dr. Diane Lytton, a forensic psychologist who had evaluated Schabusiness. Dr. Lytton testified that, in her expert opinion, Schabusiness was a “psychotic person” who was suffering from a significant mental disease at the time of the killing. She described her evaluation sessions with Schabusiness as “bizarre”. She noted that Schabusiness exhibited inappropriate facial expressions, such as smirking while discussing the crime, and displayed severely disorganized thought patterns.

Dr. Lytton recounted how Schabusiness made a series of strange and delusional comments, claiming she “had a thing with Jeffrey Dahmer a year ago” (despite Dahmer’s death in 1994) and launching into tangential ramblings about the musician Johnny Cash dying of an overdose on a train.

To support this diagnosis, the defense introduced concrete evidence of Schabusiness’s past mental health issues. They presented court documents from April 2021 showing that Schabusiness had been placed under a civil commitment order because she was deemed mentally ill and a danger to herself or others. This order had also mandated that she take psychotropic medications, establishing a legal and medical history of severe mental illness long before the murder.

Family testimony added a personal dimension to this history. Schabusiness’s father, Arturo Coronado, testified from prison about the profound impact of her mother’s death when Taylor was just 11 years old. He described her as acting out during high school and recounted how she had later fallen into a relationship with a man who introduced her to methamphetamine and fathered her child. He testified that he had personally taken her to a mental health facility at one point because she was “not in a right state of mind at all” and he feared she would harm herself.

Finally, the defense could implicitly point to Schabusiness’s own behavior in the courtroom as evidence of her instability. The most dramatic example was an incident on February 14, 2023, during a pre-trial hearing, when she physically attacked her then-attorney, Quinn Jolly, after he requested a delay to assess her competency. She had to be tackled to the ground by a sheriff’s deputy in a chaotic scene captured on courtroom video.

Prosecution Rebuttal: Volition, Not Psychosis

The prosecution mounted a vigorous rebuttal, arguing that Schabusiness’s actions were the product of a depraved character and drug abuse, not a legal mental defect.

Their key expert witness was Dr. Matthew Seipel, a psychologist appointed by the state. Dr. Seipel testified that after evaluating Schabusiness, he found no evidence of a severe mental health condition that would prevent her from understanding the wrongfulness of her actions. He directly contradicted the defense’s narrative, concluding that her disruptive and bizarre behaviors, including the courtroom attack, were “primarily volitional in nature”—in other words, they were choices, not symptoms.

Assistant District Attorney Caleb Saunders drove this point home in his arguments to the jury. He emphasized that the legal standard was not whether Schabusiness had a history of mental illness in 2021, but whether she was legally insane at the moment she committed the crime. The prosecution’s narrative remained consistent: her actions were explained by her own admission to police that “It was the dope,” combined with her malevolent and violent sexual desires. The methodical cleanup and her statements of enjoyment were presented as proof that she was aware of her actions and their consequences.

The Jury’s Finding on Culpability

The jury was presented with two starkly different portraits of Taylor Schabusiness: a severely mentally ill woman who lost touch with reality, and a manipulative killer using claims of mental illness to evade responsibility. As in the guilt phase, their decision was swift and decisive. After deliberating for less than an hour, the jury returned with their finding: they rejected the insanity defense, concluding that Taylor Schabusiness was sane and legally responsible for the murder and mutilation of Shad Thyrion.

The jury’s rapid dismissal of a defense supported by a documented history of civil commitment and expert testimony is telling. It suggests that the sheer, visceral horror of the crime created an emotional and logical barrier that the clinical nuances of a psychiatric defense could not overcome. The prosecution provided a simpler, more accessible narrative: Schabusiness was not mad, but evil. Her methodical actions, her confession of enjoyment, and her fascination with a figure like Dahmer all pointed to a coherent, albeit monstrous, internal logic.

In the face of such extreme brutality, the jury appeared to find it impossible to accept that the perpetrator did not understand that what she was doing was wrong. This creates a difficult paradox for insanity defenses in cases of extreme violence: the more heinous and seemingly “insane” the act, the more it is perceived by a jury as an act of profound, culpable evil, making the legal standard for insanity paradoxically harder to meet.

Verdict, Sentencing, and Aftermath

Sentencing (September 26, 2023)

With the jury having found Taylor Schabusiness both guilty and sane, the final stage of the legal process was sentencing. On September 26, 2023, she appeared before Brown County Circuit Judge Thomas Walsh to learn her fate. The sentence for First-Degree Intentional Homicide in Wisconsin is mandatory life in prison; the only discretion the judge had was whether to grant the possibility of parole.

Given the extreme nature of the crime, the outcome was widely anticipated. Judge Walsh sentenced Schabusiness to life in prison without the possibility of parole. He imposed additional consecutive sentences totaling 10.5 years for the charges of mutilating a corpse and third-degree sexual assault, ensuring that the legal penalty reflected the totality of her offenses.

The Judge’s Remarks

In handing down the sentence, Judge Walsh delivered powerful remarks that sought to articulate the community’s revulsion and the crime’s profound impact. He stated that “the offense in this case can’t be overstated” and struggled to find adequate words to describe the acts, noting, “You seem to run out of superlatives… These actions are foreign. They shock the community; there aren’t really words for it”. He framed his decision not merely as punishment, but as a duty to ensure public safety. In a direct address to the gravity of the crime, he concluded, “This crime offends human decency, it offends human dignity, it offends the human community. It really does”.

Defendant’s Demeanor

Throughout the sentencing hearing, Schabusiness remained largely impassive. When Judge Walsh offered her the opportunity to make a statement on her own behalf, she declined, replying simply, “No, there isn’t”. Her attorney, Christopher Froelich, made a final plea, arguing that his client was “not a monster” and that, at 25, she still had the potential for rehabilitation. It was an argument that found no purchase with the court. Judge Walsh’s sentence was a clear and final rejection of any prospect of her return to society.

Appeal and Aftermath

Following her conviction and sentencing, Schabusiness began the process of appeal. However, the effort was short-lived. In March 2025, her own court-appointed appellate attorney, Gregory Petit, filed a “no-merit report” with the court. This is a legal filing in which a defense lawyer informs the court that, after a thorough review of the case, they can find no arguable legal grounds upon which to base an appeal. The process came to a definitive end in June 2025, when Schabusiness herself submitted a hand-written letter to the appellate court, voluntarily dismissing her own appeal.

Her legal troubles, however, are not entirely over. While incarcerated, she has incurred new charges for allegedly assaulting a staff member at the prison where she is housed, with a trial on that matter pending. Taylor Schabusiness is now set to spend the remainder of her natural life behind bars, a permanent ward of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections.

Conclusion: A Legal and Psychological Analysis of the Schabusiness Case

The trial of Taylor Schabusiness stands as a profoundly disturbing case study at the intersection of criminal law, forensic psychology, and the darkest extremes of human behaviour. The legal proceedings in Brown County Circuit Court were not a “whodunit”; from the moment of her detailed confession, there was no doubt as to the perpetrator of the horrific acts committed against Shad Thyrion. Instead, the trial became an inquiry into legal and moral culpability, forcing the justice system to confront a crime that seemed to defy rational explanation.

The case presents a stark illustration of the collision between three powerful and destructive forces: severe, polysubstance abuse, particularly the volatile combination of methamphetamine and Trazodone ; a documented history of significant mental health issues, including a prior civil commitment ; and an act of extreme, sexually-motivated violence that culminated in homicide, necrophilia, and dismemberment. The state’s successful prosecution hinged on its ability to weave these elements into a narrative of inherent evil and personal responsibility, rather than one of pathology. The defense, conversely, argued that the crime itself was the ultimate symptom of a diseased mind, an argument that failed to resonate with the jury.

The bifurcated trial structure provided a formal legal framework for separating the question of action from the question of responsibility. Yet, the jury’s swift and decisive verdicts in both phases—less than an hour of deliberation for each—suggest that, in practice, this separation was difficult to maintain. The sheer brutality of the crime, laid bare through graphic testimony and bodycam footage, appeared to create an insurmountable presumption of culpability. The prosecution’s narrative, which attributed Schabusiness’s actions to a depraved character and a conscious choice to indulge violent fantasies, proved far more compelling than the defense’s more complex, clinical explanation of psychosis and delusion.

Ultimately, the verdict in the Taylor Schabusiness case underscores a significant tendency within the American legal system and, perhaps, within society at large. When confronted with crimes of such profound and visceral horror, there is a powerful inclination to prioritize concepts of good and evil, of choice and consequence, over nuanced psychiatric explanations.

The acts committed by Taylor Schabusiness were so far outside the bounds of normal human conduct that the jury concluded they could only be the product of a monstrous, but legally sane, mind. As such, the case serves as a crucial and chilling modern touchstone for understanding how our justice system adjudicates the incomprehensible, affirming the principle of personal responsibility even in the face of apparent madness.

Works Cited

⚡︎ Let’s Start A Cult ⚡︎

Subscribe Now. Unholy Trinity Newsletter. Killers. Cults. Crime

We Uncover the Bizarre.

First Name

Email address

Leave this field empty if you're human: