The Monster of Florence: Anatomy of an Unsolved Italian Nightmare

Introduction: The Shadow Over the Tuscan Hills

For seventeen years, between 1968 and 1985, a shadow fell across the idyllic, sun-drenched hills of Tuscany. An anonymous killer, dubbed Il Mostro di Firenze—the Monster of Florence—by the Italian media, methodically executed a series of brutal double homicides that transformed the region into a landscape of profound fear.¹ The killer targeted young couples seeking intimacy in the secluded country lanes surrounding Florence, murdering at least sixteen people in a reign of terror that remains one of Italy’s most haunting and unresolved criminal mysteries.² The case, however, is more than a chronicle of a serial killer’s rampage. It is a story of two intertwined tragedies: the first authored by the killer, who stole lives with a pistol and a knife, and the second by a justice system that, in its desperate and chaotic pursuit, arguably claimed victims of its own through flawed investigations and wrongful accusations.⁴

The decades-long hunt for the Monster became a labyrinth of false leads, prosecutorial tunnel vision, and public hysteria that blurred the line between fact and fiction.¹ The absence of definitive evidence created a vacuum filled by a “seductive and ever more abstract ballet of hypotheses,” spawning a culture of obsessive amateur and professional investigators known as “monsterologists”.⁶ The Monster ceased to be merely a person and evolved into a cultural phenomenon, a dark myth onto which society projected its deepest fears about sex, violence, and the existence of hidden, malevolent forces. The story of Il Mostro is therefore inseparable from the story of the flawed, obsessive, and ultimately failed hunt for him, a saga that reveals as much about the fallibility of justice as it does about the nature of evil.

Chronicle of Terror: The Eight Double Homicides

The Monster’s campaign of violence spanned nearly two decades, marked by long periods of dormancy followed by shocking bursts of activity. The eight double homicides attributed to the killer established a chilling pattern of attack, location, and post-mortem ritual that terrorized the Florentine countryside.

The series began on the night of August 21, 1968, in Signa, a town west of Florence. Antonio Lo Bianco, 29, and Barbara Locci, 32, were shot to death in their car. In a detail of profound horror, Locci’s six-year-old son, Natalino Mele, was asleep in the backseat. He awoke to find his mother dead and fled to a nearby farmhouse for help.¹ This crime was initially treated as an isolated domestic affair. Locci’s husband, Stefano Mele, was charged, convicted, and imprisoned, and the case was considered closed.²

After a six-year silence, the killer returned on September 15, 1974. Teenagers Pasquale Gentilcore, 19, and Stefania Pettini, 18, were attacked in their Fiat 127 near Borgo San Lorenzo.³ Both were shot and stabbed, but the killer’s actions on Pettini’s body marked a terrifying escalation. Her corpse was violated with a grapevine stalk and bore 97 separate stab wounds, signaling the arrival of a predator with a new, horrific ritual.³

The early 1980s saw a brutal acceleration. On June 6, 1981, Giovanni Foggi, 30, and Carmela De Nuccio, 21, were murdered in Scandicci. Here, the mutilation became more focused and surgical: the killer dragged De Nuccio’s body from the car and excised her pubic area with a knife.³ Just four months later, on October 23, 1981, the Monster struck again in Calenzano, killing Stefano Baldi, 26, and Susanna Cambi, 24, and repeating the signature mutilation.³ The following summer, on June 19, 1982, Paolo Mainardi, 22, and Antonella Migliorini, 20, were attacked in Baccaiano. Mainardi clung to life when discovered but died on the way to the hospital, a fact that led police to leak false information that he had identified his attacker in a desperate bid to draw the killer out.³

The murder of Horst Wilhelm Meyer and Jens-Uwe Rüsch on September 9, 1983, was a shocking deviation. The two 24-year-old German men were killed in their camper van in Giogoli. Investigators theorized the killer mistook Rüsch, who had long blond hair, for a woman, as his body was subjected to the same mutilations as the female victims.⁷ The pattern of escalating brutality resumed on July 29, 1984, in Vicchio. After killing Claudio Stefanacci, 21, and Pia Rontini, 18, the killer excised not only Rontini’s pubic area but also her left breast.³

The final canonical murders occurred on September 8, 1985, in Scopeti. French tourists Jean-Michel Kraveichvili, 25, and Nadine Mauriot, 36, were shot and stabbed while camping in their tent.¹ Mauriot’s body suffered the same double excision as the previous victim. In a final act of taunting defiance, the killer mailed a flap of Mauriot’s breast in an envelope to Silvia Della Monica, a state prosecutor involved in the investigation, cementing his place in the annals of criminal infamy.³

The Killer’s Signature: Modus Operandi and Ballistic Fingerprints

The crimes attributed to the Monster of Florence were linked by a chillingly consistent and evolving signature that provided investigators with their only tangible connection between the disparate crime scenes. This signature was composed of three core elements: a single firearm, a specific victimology and timing, and a pathologically precise ritual of post-mortem mutilation.

The single most critical piece of physical evidence in the case was the weapon. In every one of the eight double homicides, the killer used the same.22 caliber Beretta pistol.⁹ Forensic ballistics confirmed that the bullets recovered from all sixteen victims were fired from this one gun. Furthermore, the ammunition was consistently Winchester brand, Series H, meaning the cartridges were marked with the letter “H” on the base.¹ This ballistic fingerprint was the immutable thread connecting the 1968 murder to the final attack in 1985. Despite its central importance, the murder weapon has never been found.¹ The use of a single, traceable firearm over a 17-year span presents a profound paradox. For a lone, intelligent killer, retaining such a damning piece of evidence is an act of extreme arrogance and foolishness. For a criminal conspiracy, as was later alleged, it is an almost nonsensical risk, creating a single point of failure that could unravel the entire group. The gun is therefore not just a piece of evidence; it is the central enigma of the case.

The killer’s ritual was equally consistent. The targets were almost always young couples seeking privacy in cars or tents in isolated, rural “lovers’ lanes” on the outskirts of Florence.³ The attacks were timed with predatory precision, occurring on weekends or holidays and typically on dark, moonless nights, maximizing the killer’s advantage of surprise and concealment.³ The execution of the crimes followed a strict script: the male victim was always shot and neutralized first, eliminating the primary physical threat before the killer turned his full attention to the female.³

It was this attention that revealed the killer’s deepest pathology. The post-mortem mutilations were not acts of random, frenzied violence but a methodical and escalating ritual. What began with a chaotic stabbing in 1974 evolved into the precise, surgical excision of the female victim’s pubic region in 1981.³ This ritual then escalated further in 1984 to include the removal of the left breast.³ These acts suggest a killer driven by a powerful and specific sexual fantasy, collecting trophies from his victims. This was not just about killing; it was about possession. The act of mailing a victim’s body part to a prosecutor elevates the killer from a mere murderer to a performer engaging in a grotesque form of communication.⁶ Like Jack the Ripper or the Zodiac Killer, the Monster of Florence was keenly aware of his audience—the police and the terrified public—and used his crimes to taunt them, asserting his power and control. The mutilations were his signature, a message written in blood.

Forensic Analysis: The Unseen Evidence

While the killer was meticulous in leaving behind almost no traditional trace evidence, modern forensic science provided the only concrete links between the crimes. Ballistics, pathology reports, and recent DNA analysis have painted a clearer, albeit still incomplete, picture of the Monster’s methods.

The Ballistic Thread

Forensic ballistics was the cornerstone of the entire investigation, proving that all eight double homicides were the work of a single firearm.¹⁹

• The Weapon: A.22 caliber Beretta pistol was used in all sixteen murders.³
• The Ammunition: The killer exclusively used Winchester Series H bullets, identifiable by the letter “H” stamped on the base of the cartridge.¹ These copper-jacketed bullets were a crucial link between the crime scenes.⁸
• The Pacciani Bullet: A key piece of evidence in the case against Pietro Pacciani was an unfired.22 caliber Winchester Series H bullet found in his garden. Detailed analysis revealed micro-striations on the casing. Crucially, these marks were not from the firing cycle but from the loading cycle, caused by friction against the firearm’s feed ramp. This indicated the bullet had been chambered in the same Beretta used in the murders, providing a direct, though circumstantial, link between Pacciani and the murder weapon.¹⁹

An Escalating Ritual of Mutilation

The post-mortem mutilations were not random but followed a clear, escalating pattern, suggesting an evolving ritual or fantasy. The attacks after the initial shootings were performed with a knife.³

The DNA Ghost

For decades, the case was marked by a complete lack of biological evidence. However, recent analysis has introduced a new, tantalizing clue.

• New Profile: In August 2024, Dr. Lorenzo Iovino studied DNA samples from bullets recovered from the final three crime scenes (1983, 1984, and 1985).⁷ This analysis identified a previously unknown male DNA profile.¹¹
• Unmatched: This DNA does not match any of the victims or any of the men convicted or formally investigated for the crimes, including Pietro Pacciani.¹¹
• Contamination Concerns: While this discovery opens a potential new avenue for the investigation, experts urge caution. After nearly four decades, the risk of the evidence being contaminated by investigators or lab technicians is extremely high.¹

A Phantom at the Scene

One of the most confounding aspects of the case is the near-total absence of other forensic evidence. Across eight crime scenes and sixteen victims, investigators found no definitive fingerprints or DNA attributable to the killer or the convicted accomplices.³ This lack of evidence suggests a forensically aware perpetrator. Police tests from the time indicated the killer may have worn rubber surgical gloves during the attacks.⁸

A Labyrinth of Leads: The Decades-Long Investigation

The hunt for the Monster of Florence was a sprawling, chaotic, and ultimately tragic saga of investigative failure. Plagued by tunnel vision, a reliance on flimsy evidence, and an inability to adapt, the investigation cycled through multiple theories and suspects over two decades, each phase ending in collapse and leaving the killer free to strike again.

The First Domino: The 1968 Murder and the Wrongful Conviction of Stefano Mele

The investigation’s foundational error occurred at the very beginning. Following the 1968 murders of Barbara Locci and Antonio Lo Bianco, police quickly focused on Locci’s husband, Stefano Mele.³ Mele confessed to the crime and was convicted, seemingly closing the case.¹ However, his conviction was a catastrophic mistake. The Monster’s subsequent murders, committed while Mele was incarcerated, proved he could not have been the sole perpetrator.² Mele’s confession was highly inconsistent, and under questioning, he began to implicate a web of Sardinian relatives and acquaintances in the crime, inadvertently setting the police on a long and fruitless path.¹ The critical ballistic link between the 1968 crime and the later series—the use of the same.22 Beretta—was not established until 1982. An anonymous tip prompted investigators to re-examine the original case file, where they discovered the matching shell casings had been improperly stored and overlooked for fourteen years.³

Pista Sarda: Chasing Ghosts on the Sardinian Trail

Fueled by Stefano Mele’s unreliable accusations, the investigation spent years consumed by the pista sarda, or “Sardinian trail”.² This theory held that the murders were the work of a clan of Sardinian immigrants connected to the Locci and Mele families.⁶ The primary suspects were men who had been lovers of the notoriously promiscuous Barbara Locci, including Francesco Vinci and his brothers.¹ This line of inquiry dominated the early years of the investigation, leading to a series of arrests and intense interrogations. The commitment to this theory was so absolute that it blinded investigators to other possibilities. The entire pista sarda collapsed spectacularly in 1984 when the Monster murdered Claudio Stefanacci and Pia Rontini while the main Sardinian suspects were in police custody.¹ Their immediate release marked the definitive failure of the investigation’s first major phase, representing years of wasted time and resources.

The Farmer: The Rise and Fall of the Case Against Pietro Pacciani

In the early 1990s, after the Sardinian trail went cold, suspicion shifted to a new and compelling suspect: Pietro Pacciani, an illiterate, violent farmer with a dark past that included a 1951 murder conviction and a later conviction for raping his two daughters.² Pacciani seemed to fit the profile of a brutal, sexually deviant killer. However, the evidence against him was almost entirely circumstantial. The prosecution’s case rested on his character and history, with only one piece of physical evidence: an unfired.22 caliber Winchester bullet, of the same type used by the Monster, found during a search of his garden.⁷

Despite the weakness of the forensic case, Pacciani was put on trial in 1994 in a media circus. He was convicted of seven of the eight double murders and sentenced to multiple life terms.² In a stunning reversal, however, the Florence Court of Appeal acquitted him in 1996, citing a lack of evidence and criticizing the “sloppy police work” that had built the case.¹ Italy’s highest court later annulled the acquittal and ordered a new trial, but Pacciani died of a heart attack in 1998 before it could commence, leaving his involvement in the case in permanent legal limbo.¹ This entire investigative arc demonstrates a profound pattern of confirmation bias. Investigators did not follow evidence to Pacciani; they selected him as a suspect based on his profile and then built a narrative around him, a narrative that ultimately could not withstand judicial scrutiny.

The Snack Buddies: A Dubious Confession and a Contentious Conviction

Rather than reconsidering their approach after Pacciani’s acquittal, prosecutors doubled down, developing a new theory: Pacciani had not acted alone but was the leader of a small gang of accomplices.¹² This led to the arrest of his friends, Mario Vanni and Giancarlo Lotti. The group was bizarrely nicknamed the “compagni di merende” (“Snack Buddies”) after Vanni protested in court that they were merely friends who often met for snacks.³

The case against the Snack Buddies hinged almost entirely on the confession of Giancarlo Lotti, who admitted his involvement and implicated Pacciani and Vanni in several of the murders.¹ Lotti’s testimony provided prosecutors with the complete narrative they had been missing, one with clear roles and a simple motive. However, his confession was notoriously inconsistent, changed multiple times, and was widely questioned by legal experts and journalists.¹ In a justice system starved for a resolution, this narrative proved more powerful than the absence of physical proof. In 2000, Mario Vanni and Giancarlo Lotti were definitively convicted for four of the eight double murders and later died in prison.³ This outcome did not solve the mystery; it merely provided a legal endpoint to a failed investigation. The convictions represented the triumph of a convenient story over a vacuum of evidence, a resolution that satisfied the court but left the truth shrouded in doubt.

Theories from the Abyss: Monsters, Sects, and Conspiracies

The manifest failures and logical inconsistencies of the official investigation created fertile ground for a host of alternative theories. These hypotheses, ranging from criminal profiling to elaborate conspiracies, arose to fill the evidentiary vacuum and provide explanations for a case that seemed to defy simple logic. The persistence of these theories is as much a product of the investigation’s shortcomings as it is of the crimes themselves.

The Lone Wolf vs. The Pack

The most fundamental debate among “monsterologists” is whether the crimes were the work of a single individual or a group. The argument for a lone wolf perpetrator is compelling: the highly consistent modus operandi, the use of a single firearm across all eight crimes, and the deeply personal, ritualistic nature of the mutilations all point toward a single psychological obsession.¹¹ An FBI profile conducted in 2007 supported this view, concluding the killer most likely acted alone.¹¹

Conversely, the theory that there were multiple “monsters” gained traction as a way to explain away the case’s contradictions.⁶ Some found it difficult to believe that an uneducated farmer like Pacciani could have carried out the mutilations with such surgical precision, suggesting the involvement of someone with anatomical knowledge.⁶ The official conviction of the “Snack Buddies” was the ultimate endorsement of a group theory, even if it was a crude and intellectually unsatisfying one.

The “Second Level”: The Satanic Cult and High-Society Conspiracy

The most elaborate and enduring alternative theory posits the existence of a “second level” of perpetrators. In this scenario, crude figures like Pacciani and the Snack Buddies were not the masterminds but merely low-level foot soldiers, “delivery-men” hired to commit the murders and procure human body parts for a wealthy and sophisticated satanic sect.¹⁵

This theory, pursued vigorously by some investigators and journalists, alleges that the true “monsters” were respected members of Tuscan society—doctors, artists, and other professionals—who orchestrated the killings for use in occult rituals.¹⁵ The mutilations were not the product of a lone killer’s fantasy but were commissions to harvest trophies for black masses.⁶ This hypothesis offered a neat explanation for Pacciani’s otherwise mysterious wealth, suggesting his savings and properties were payments from this powerful cabal.¹⁵ The theory was further fueled by the suspicious 1985 death of Dr. Francesco Narducci, a physician from Perugia whom prosecutor Giuliano Mignini alleged was a member of the sect.¹ Some versions of the theory even implicate Italy’s secret service, SISDE, in a cover-up to protect powerful members.¹⁶

The satanic cult theory is compelling not because of the evidence supporting it, which remains thin and speculative, but because it provides a grand, unified narrative that resolves the case’s primary contradictions. It explains the combination of crude violence (the “Snack Buddies”) and apparent surgical skill (a doctor within the sect). It accounts for the killer’s seeming impunity for seventeen years and offers a motive for the otherwise inexplicable mutilations. Its popularity is a testament to the human need for a coherent story, especially when the official one is so riddled with holes. Furthermore, this theory taps into a deep vein of Italian cultural paranoia regarding secretive, powerful elites, from Masonic lodges to political conspiracies. The Monster of Florence case became a dark canvas onto which these pre-existing societal anxieties were projected, demonstrating how a criminal investigation can be shaped and distorted by the broader fears of its time.

The Investigation on Trial: Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Pursuit of Journalists

As the years passed and the case remained unsolved, the focus of the Monster of Florence saga began to shift. The dysfunction within the Italian justice system became a story in its own right, marked by institutional infighting, questionable prosecutorial tactics, and the extraordinary moment when the investigation turned its sights on the very journalists who were scrutinizing its failures.

The Journalists Become the Story

In 2000, American thriller author Douglas Preston moved with his family to a farmhouse near Florence, only to discover that one of the Monster’s double murders had occurred in the olive grove on his property.⁴ Intrigued, he teamed up with veteran Italian journalist Mario Spezi, who had covered the case for decades. Their collaboration resulted in the book The Monster of Florence: A True Story, a work that was deeply critical of the official investigation and proposed its own theory about the killer’s identity.⁴

Their investigation, however, put them on a collision course with the Italian authorities. In a bizarre and alarming turn of events, Preston and Spezi went from being chroniclers of the case to becoming suspects in it. Prosecutors, particularly Giuliano Mignini, accused them of obstruction of justice, planting false evidence, and other crimes.⁴ Spezi was arrested and jailed, while Preston was subjected to a lengthy interrogation and effectively exiled from the country under threat of arrest.⁴ This episode represented a chilling escalation, where the justice system appeared to move from investigating a crime to actively persecuting its critics. The “crime” of the journalists was not murder, but dissent; they had challenged the official narrative, and the system reacted not by engaging with their findings but by attempting to silence them.

A System in Conflict

The targeting of Preston and Spezi was a symptom of a deeper malaise within the investigation. The case was hampered by intense “turf wars” between different prosecutorial offices, most notably those in Florence and Perugia, which battled for control over the sprawling inquiry.⁶ This rivalry led to a fractured and uncoordinated effort. Furthermore, the frequent and mysterious appearance and disappearance of key pieces of evidence led some observers to suspect manipulation or even complicity by elements within law enforcement.⁶

The conduct of prosecutor Giuliano Mignini became a focal point of criticism. His reliance on unsubstantiated conspiracy theories and his aggressive tactics drew condemnation both in Italy and abroad.¹ Years later, Mignini would employ a similar, highly speculative approach as the lead prosecutor in the internationally publicized murder case of Meredith Kercher, for which Amanda Knox was accused, convicted, and ultimately exonerated.¹ The involvement of a prominent American writer like Douglas Preston brought an unprecedented level of international scrutiny to the Italian justice system. His articles for The Atlantic and the subsequent book exposed the case’s bizarre twists to a global audience, framing the Monster of Florence saga as a cautionary tale of judicial failure.⁴

Conclusion: An Enduring Italian Mystery

More than half a century after the first murder, the Monster of Florence case remains fundamentally unresolved. Despite multiple trials, a handful of contentious convictions, and decades of investigation, there is no definitive answer to the identity of the killer or killers who terrorized Tuscany.³ The convictions of Mario Vanni and Giancarlo Lotti for four of the eight double murders stand as the official legal conclusion, yet they are widely regarded by experts, journalists, and a significant portion of the public as an inadequate and unconvincing solution to a far more complex mystery.³

The case remains open, a cold case still capable of generating new leads. The most tantalizing recent development is the identification of a new male DNA profile found on bullets recovered from three separate crime scenes: the 1983, 1984, and 1985 murders.⁷ This DNA does not match any of the victims or the men convicted of the crimes, offering a potential key to unlocking the decades-old enigma.¹¹ However, after so many years, the possibility of evidence contamination is high, and this lead, like so many before it, may ultimately lead nowhere.¹¹ The single most crucial piece of evidence, the.22 caliber Beretta pistol that links all sixteen deaths, has never been found.¹

The cultural legacy of the Monster of Florence is immense and indelible. It was Italy’s “first modern serial killer case,” and it profoundly altered the social fabric of the region, instilling a collective fear that changed public habits for a generation.³ The saga has been immortalized in countless books, documentaries, and television series, including a 2025 Netflix production, cementing its place in the global true-crime canon.⁹ The case famously inspired novelist Thomas Harris, who, after attending the Pacciani trial, incorporated elements of the mystery—particularly the suspicion of a sophisticated, high-society killer hiding in plain sight—into the character of Dr. Hannibal Lecter.¹⁵

Ultimately, the Monster of Florence endures in the public imagination not simply because we do not know who the killer was, but because the chaotic and contradictory search for him revealed deeper, more unsettling truths about the fallibility of justice and the nature of truth itself. The “ballet of hypotheses” continues because no single theory can satisfactorily account for all the facts, and the official solution feels hollow.⁶ The true monster may have been a lone man, a gang of crude “snack buddies,” or a sinister cabal of elites. But the story’s lasting horror lies in the certainty that the system designed to find him failed, leaving behind only unanswered questions, ruined lives, and an indelible shadow that still lingers over the Tuscan hills.

Works cited

1. The Chilling True Story Behind The Monster of Florence | TIME, accessed October 27, 2025, https://time.com/7327706/monster-of-florence-netflix-true-story/
2. Monster of Florence | Murders, Netflix, Movie, Book, & Facts | Britannica, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Monster-of-Florence
3. Monster of Florence – Wikipedia, accessed October 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster_of_Florence
4. The Monster of Florence: A True Story – Wikipedia, accessed October 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Monster_of_Florence:_A_True_Story
5. The Monster of Florence by Douglas Preston | Goodreads, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6630371
6. Were their body parts used in satanic rituals? Netflix tackles the horrific ‘Monster of Florence’ murders | Television & radio | The Guardian, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/oct/13/body-parts-satanic-rituals-netflix-monster-of-florence-murders
7. The True Story Behind Netflix’s ‘Monster of Florence’ – Biography, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.biography.com/crime/a69110806/monster-of-florence-true-story-netflix
8. Italy: The Monster of Florence – Time Magazine, accessed October 27, 2025, https://time.com/archive/6673629/italy-the-monster-of-florence/
9. The Monster of Florence (2025 miniseries) – Wikipedia, accessed October 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Monster_of_Florence_(2025_miniseries)
10. Netflix Announces ‘Il Mostro’: Start of Production for the TV Series That Tells the Story of the Monster of Florence, Directed by Stefano Sollima, accessed October 27, 2025, https://about.netflix.com/news/netflix-announces-il-mostro-start-of-production-for-the-tv-series-that-tells
11. Newly found DNA could shed light on “Monster of Florence” serial …, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/monster-of-florence-serial-killer-cold-case-new-dna-mysterious-murders-couples/
12. Was the Monster of Florence Ever Found? | Serial Killer, Suspects, Sardinian Trail, Snack Buddies, & Facts | Britannica, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Was-the-Monster-of-Florence-ever-found
13. Making a Killing: The “Monster of Florence” and the Trial(s) of Pietro Pacciani, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304738222_Making_a_Killing_The_Monster_of_Florence_and_the_Trials_of_Pietro_Pacciani
14. Appeal court clears man of murders – The Irish Times, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.irishtimes.com/news/appeal-court-clears-man-of-murders-1.29985
15. Monster of Florence may still be alive | World news – The Guardian, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/aug/08/rorycarroll
16. Italian mass killer ‘was servant of Satanic sect’ | World news | The …, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/09/rorycarroll.theobserver
17. The Monster of Florence by Douglas Preston, Mario Spezi, Paperback | Barnes & Noble®, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-monster-of-florence-douglas-preston/1100297239
18. Potwór z Florencji. Sprawa seryjnego mordercy z Włoch, który mordował zakochanych [18+], accessed October 27, 2025, https://historykon.pl/bestia-z-toskanskich-wzgorz-jak-potwor-z-florencji-zmienil-wlochy-na-zawsze-18/