Manufacturing a Monster: A Critical Analysis of Historical Distortion in Netflix’s “Monster: The Ed Gein Story”

Section I: The Genesis of a Modern Myth

1.1 From Plainfield Ghoul to Pop Culture Progenitor

Edward Theodore Gein, a name now synonymous with the darkest corners of American folklore, first entered the public consciousness in November 1957 under the grim monikers “Butcher of Plainfield” or the “Plainfield Ghoul”. The media frenzy that erupted from the isolated farmlands of Plainfield, Wisconsin, was not fueled by a high body count, a typical metric for criminal infamy. Gein was conclusively linked to only two murders: Mary Hogan in 1954 and Bernice Worden in 1957.

Instead, his notoriety was cemented by the almost unimaginable nature of his supplementary crimes: a years-long campaign of grave-robbing, acts of necrophilia, and the subsequent crafting of household artifacts and clothing from the exhumed remains of the dead. The discovery of his “house of horrors” presented a form of depravity so profound and bizarre that it immediately transcended the boundaries of conventional crime reporting and entered the realm of myth.  

Gein’s true historical and cultural significance, therefore, lies not in his actions as a killer but in his posthumous role as a foundational archetype for 20th-century horror cinema. The specific details of his psychosis and the macabre inventory of his home provided the direct psychological and visual templates for three of the genre’s most enduring villains. The Oedipal fixation on a deceased, domineering mother became the core of Norman Bates in Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho (1960). The practice of creating masks and home decor from human skin was grotesquely reimagined for Leatherface in The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974).

The ultimate ambition of constructing a “woman suit” from the flesh of his victims was the defining motive for Buffalo Bill in The Silence of the Lambs (1991). Consequently, the life of Ed Gein is viewed less through the lens of a conventional criminal profile and more as the source code for the modern cinematic depiction of a particular brand of psychological horror rooted in Freudian trauma and corporeal desecration. He was not the first serial killer, but he was the unwilling progenitor of the modern movie monster.  

The following table details Gein’s direct influence on these iconic horror films:

1.2 The “Monster” Anthology’s Mandate and Critical Reception

The Netflix production, Monster: The Ed Gein Story, arrives as the third installment in a commercially formidable true-crime anthology series created by Ryan Murphy and Ian Brennan, following highly successful seasons focused on Jeffrey Dahmer and the Menendez brothers. The series explicitly frames its subject as “The Original Monster,” a title that immediately establishes a specific and historically burdensome narrative mandate. This branding positions Gein not merely as a subject of historical inquiry but as the genesis figure for the modern “celebrity serial killer,” explicitly linking his story to the evolution of true crime into a pervasive pop culture phenomenon.  

This ambitious framing, however, created a fundamental conflict between the show’s commercial imperatives and the documented facts of Gein’s life, a conflict that was immediately seized upon by critics. The series was met with a wave of overwhelmingly negative reviews, which condemned it for its “unfocused storyline, graphic violence, and factual inaccuracies” , its descent into “voyeuristic pandering” , and its conspicuous lack of any discernible “moral dimension”.

The core of this critical backlash stems from a central, unresolvable problem: the historical Edward Gein—a deeply disturbed, socially inept man driven by an isolated psychosis, responsible for only two murders, and defined primarily by necrophilic grave-robbing—does not possess the requisite dramatic scope for a multi-episode serialized narrative designed to compete with its high-body-count predecessors.  

The series’ decision to brand Gein as “The Original Monster” is, therefore, a deliberate and historically problematic marketing choice. An examination of the historical record reveals that Gein’s primary notoriety derived not from serial homicide—a category for which figures like H.H. Holmes serve as earlier progenitors—but from his unique pathology of grave desecration. His cultural legacy is that of a prototype for a specific cinematic monster, one defined by psychosis and body horror.

The Monster anthology, however, built its brand on high-volume killers. To position Gein as a predecessor within this established commercial framework, his criminality required narrative inflation. To meet the expectations of an audience primed by the stories of Dahmer and the Menendez brothers, the show’s creators grafted conventional dramatic conflicts onto Gein’s life, fabricating early homicides and inventing complex romantic relationships. This structural choice demonstrates a clear prioritization of dramatic scale over historical fidelity. Consequently, the series conflates the concept of a “cinematic progenitor” with that of a “serial killer,” a calculated act of historical revisionism that rebrands the “Plainfield Ghoul” into a more commercially recognizable villain, thereby justifying the factual distortions that form the core of its dramatic structure.  

Section II: Establishing the Verifiable Record: The Historical Edward Gein

To accurately measure the degree of narrative distortion present in the Netflix series, it is imperative to first establish the verifiable, documented facts of Edward Gein’s life and crimes. This historical baseline is derived from the original 1957 police investigation, subsequent psychiatric evaluations, and authoritative biographical accounts.

2.1 The Crucible of the Gein Farmhouse: Augusta’s Dominion

Edward Theodore Gein was born in La Crosse, Wisconsin, in 1906 and spent his formative years in a deeply troubled and isolated environment alongside his elder brother, Henry. At the direction of their mother, Augusta, the family relocated to a remote 160-acre farm outside of Plainfield, a move she deliberately made to shield her sons from the perceived sinfulness and corrupting influence of the outside world. The Gein farmhouse, which famously lacked basic amenities like electricity and plumbing, became a physical manifestation of their profound social and psychological isolation.  

Augusta Gein was, by all accounts, the “undisputed head” of the family—an exceptionally “domineering, strict, and very religious matriarch”. She subjected her sons to constant verbal abuse while simultaneously instilling in them a deep-seated fear and hatred of other women, whom she viewed as vessels of immorality. She frequently read to them from the Old Testament, fixating on graphic stories of death and divine retribution, and often predicted that a new great flood would come to cleanse the world of female sinfulness.

This relentless misogynistic conditioning, combined with an intense and unhealthy attachment, is widely believed by experts to have caused Ed to develop a severe Oedipus complex. As a result, he was cripplingly shy, never pursued romantic relationships, and remained pathologically dependent on his mother well into adulthood.  

The successive deaths of his father in 1940, his brother Henry in 1944, and finally his mother Augusta from a stroke in 1945 left the 39-year-old Ed completely alone. Augusta’s death was a psychologically devastating event, universally considered the primary catalyst for his subsequent descent into psychosis and criminality. In a characteristic act of pathological preservation, Gein cordoned off the rooms his mother had used most frequently—her bedroom, the parlor, and the living room—maintaining them as a “macabre shrine” to her memory while the rest of the house fell into squalor.  

The following timeline outlines the key events in Gein’s life:

2.2 A Pathology of Desecration: Confirmed Crimes and Compulsions

The verifiable criminal record of Edward Gein reveals a crucial distinction between his acts of homicide and his more defining, voluminous crimes of desecration. He was conclusively linked, through his own confession and the discovery of physical evidence, to the murders of two women: Mary Hogan, a 54-year-old tavern owner who disappeared in December 1954, and Bernice Worden, a 58-year-old hardware store owner who vanished in November 1957. Both victims were middle-aged women who reportedly bore a physical resemblance to his deceased mother.  

However, Gein’s primary and most defining criminal activity was grave-robbing. His descent began not with murder, but with the desecration of the dead. He confessed to investigators that, beginning around 1947, two years after his mother’s death, he began making dozens of nocturnal visits to local cemeteries. While he claimed to have committed more than forty such exhumations, authorities were able to confirm at least nine separate instances of grave desecration.

His motive, as he explained it, was to acquire the corpses of recently deceased, middle-aged women in order to possess their remains. He would tan their skins to create a “woman suit” and other macabre artifacts, driven by a twisted compulsion to “become” his mother and literally crawl into her skin. Though he admitted to practicing necrophilia, he consistently denied engaging in cannibalism or sexual intercourse with the corpses.  

This timeline is fundamental to understanding his psychology. Gein’s pathology was one of escalating intimacy with the dead, not escalating violence against the living. His criminal career began with the passive act of stealing corpses from graves in 1947 and only escalated to the active violence of murder in 1954, seven years later. He reportedly claimed that he turned to murder only when the frozen winter ground of Wisconsin made grave-digging too difficult, suggesting that homicide was a pragmatic, secondary solution to obtain the materials his psychosis demanded. This sequence reveals a man whose primary compulsion was not to kill, but to possess the dead.  

The following table distinguishes between Gein’s confirmed murders and other suspected cases:

2.3 The 1957 Inventory of Horrors: A Meticulous Catalogue

The investigation into Bernice Worden’s disappearance on November 16, 1957, led Waushara County Sheriff’s deputies to Gein’s isolated farmhouse. What they discovered inside would shock the nation and form the basis of his enduring macabre reputation. Upon entering a summer kitchen attached to the main house, officers found Worden’s decapitated body hung upside down by her ankles from a crossbar, “dressed out like a deer”.  

A thorough search of the squalid, unlit home revealed a gallery of horrors that confirmed years of grave-robbing and desecration. The official inventory of artifacts, compiled from various law enforcement and journalistic accounts, includes the following confirmed items:

• Human Remains: The severed heads of both Bernice Worden and Mary Hogan were recovered, one in a burlap sack and the other in a box. Bernice Worden’s heart was found in a plastic bag on the stove. Various other organs were stored in jars in the refrigerator.  
• Household Items: Investigators found bowls made from the tops of human skulls , chairs with seats upholstered in tanned human skin , and a lampshade made from the skin of a human face.  
• Apparel and Trophies: The most infamous discovery was the “woman suit”—a vest-like garment crafted from the skin of a female torso, complete with breasts and genitalia attached. Other items included leggings made from human leg skin , a corset made from a female torso , a belt made from human nipples , a collection of nine vulvae in a shoebox , and numerous face masks carefully peeled from the skulls of female corpses.  

The following table provides a more detailed inventory of the artifacts found in Gein’s home:

2.4 Legal and Psychiatric Adjudication

Following his arrest, Gein was subjected to extensive psychiatric evaluation. He was diagnosed with schizophrenia and initially found mentally incompetent to stand trial. He was committed to the Central State Hospital for the Criminally Insane in Waupun, Wisconsin. A decade later, in 1968, he was deemed fit to stand trial. In a bifurcated trial, a judge first found him guilty of the first-degree murder of Bernice Worden. However, in the second phase of the trial, he was found “not guilty by reason of insanity”.

This legal outcome is critical, as it underscores that the judicial system itself ultimately defined him not by calculated criminal malice but by the profound nature of his mental illness. He spent the remainder of his life institutionalized, dying of respiratory failure in a state mental hospital in 1984. The historical Gein is, therefore, a figure defined by a unique, isolated pathology of necrophilia and psychosis, a ghoul who only later escalated to murder, not a conventional, ruthless serial killer.  

Section III: The Anatomy of Fictionalization: A Systematic Analysis of Narrative Deviations

The Netflix series Monster: The Ed Gein Story engages in a systematic restructuring of the historical record, transforming ambiguous events and minor figures into foundational pillars of its dramatic narrative. These deviations are not minor embellishments but fundamental alterations that serve specific, identifiable narrative functions.

An analysis of three central fabrications—the fratricide of Henry Gein, the romantic relationship with Adeline Watkins, and the thematic influence of Ilse Koch—reveals a coordinated strategy to reverse-engineer the historical Gein into a character who conforms to the structural requirements of a prestige television drama. The passive, incomprehensible psychological descent of the real man is replaced with clear, actionable, and linear causal factors, sacrificing the chilling truth of his isolated madness for the convenience of narrative momentum.

3.1 Fabricating an Origin: The Fratricide of Henry Gein

Historical Account

Henry Gein, Ed’s elder brother, died on May 16, 1944, at the age of 43, under circumstances that remain a subject of historical speculation. On that day, the brothers were fighting a brush fire on their property when, according to Ed, they became separated. Ed later reported Henry missing. When a search party was assembled, Ed was able to lead them directly to his brother’s body, which was found lying face down and untouched by the fire.

An official cause of death was listed by the county coroner as heart failure due to asphyxiation from smoke inhalation. However, the historical record contains significant ambiguities that have fueled suspicion for decades. It was later reported that Henry had bruises on his head, suggesting he had been struck. Furthermore, it was known that Henry was concerned about Ed’s intense and unhealthy devotion to their mother and had occasionally confronted Augusta about her domineering influence. Despite these suspicious details, no official investigation was conducted, no autopsy was performed, and the death was officially ruled an accident. Ed Gein never confessed to harming his brother, and the event remains an unresolved historical mystery.  

Netflix Series Depiction

The series premiere dispenses with all historical ambiguity and presents Henry’s death as Ed Gein’s definitive first murder. In this dramatized version, Henry expresses a clear desire to leave the farm and escape Augusta’s suffocating control, leading to a direct physical confrontation with Ed in the woods. The show depicts Ed striking Henry on the head with a piece of wood, killing him. He then carries the body and deliberately sets the brush fire as a means to conceal the fratricide.  

Analysis of Deviation

This profound distortion serves a crucial narrative purpose: the creation of a clear and unambiguous “origin story” for the monster. By transforming a historical mystery into a calculated act of murder, the series provides Gein with a definitive “first kill,” a foundational moment of violent transgression. This choice aligns Gein’s story with the conventional narrative arc of a fictional serial killer, which typically demands a linear path of escalating evil that can be traced back to a single, causal event.

The motivation provided—defending his mother’s honor against a brother who sought to disrupt their pathological bond—establishes Gein’s capacity for lethal violence a full decade before his first historically confirmed murder in 1954. This structural alteration fundamentally rewrites his psychological profile. It shifts him from a passive, traumatized individual who slowly descended into a psychosis centered on the dead into an active, malicious killer who was willing to murder the living to protect his twisted family dynamic from the very beginning. The ambiguity of the real event is sacrificed for the causal efficiency required by serialized drama.

3.2 Inventing Intimacy: The Romantic Conspiracy of Adeline Watkins

Historical Account

The real Adeline Watkins was an acquaintance of Ed Gein whose connection to him was brief, minimal, and subject to sensationalized reporting that she later refuted. In the immediate aftermath of Gein’s arrest in November 1957, Watkins gave a sensational interview to the Minneapolis Tribune, in which she claimed to have had a 20-year romance with Gein and to have rejected a marriage proposal from him in 1955. She described him in glowing terms as “good and sweet and kind” and admitted that they had discussed murder cases, which she found “interesting”. This story was widely syndicated and created the initial public image of their relationship.  

Crucially, however, this narrative was short-lived. A few weeks later, seemingly uncomfortable with her sudden notoriety, Watkins contacted local newspapers, including the Plainfield Sun and the Stevens Point Journal, to explicitly retract and clarify her earlier statements. In these follow-up reports, she stated that the original story was “blown up out of proportion” and contained “untrue statements”. She clarified that while she had known Gein for 20 years, their regular interactions were intermittent and occurred over a period of only about seven months after 1954. She stressed that their relationship was purely platonic, that any romantic involvement was “minimal and infrequent,” and, most significantly, that she had never entered his home.  

Netflix Series Depiction

Monster: The Ed Gein Story disregards Watkins’ retraction entirely and instead elevates her initial, sensationalized claims into a central pillar of the narrative. In the series, Adeline Watkins (portrayed by Suzanna Son) is a main character who serves as Gein’s primary romantic love interest, girlfriend, and confidante over a complex, two-decade-long relationship. She is depicted as a “kindred spirit” who shares his morbid fascinations and is an active participant in his dark world, even accompanying him on grave-robbing excursions and interacting with other fictionalized figures like Ilse Koch. The show suggests she not only received a marriage proposal but accepted it.  

Analysis of Deviation

The invention of this elaborate, long-term romance serves to fill a significant dramatic vacuum at the heart of the historical Gein story. The real Edward Gein was pathologically isolated, socially dysfunctional, and cripplingly inept with women—a character whose internal world is largely inaccessible and difficult to sustain across an eight-episode narrative. By fabricating a fully functional, complex, and intimate relationship with Watkins, the series provides itself with an essential dramatic tool.

She becomes a vehicle for dialogue, allowing Gein’s twisted psychology to be externalized through conversation rather than merely implied through his grotesque actions. She creates opportunities for conventional external conflict—love, jealousy, betrayal—and offers an emotional entry point for the audience, attempting to humanize a figure whose defining trait was his profound inhumanity. This dramatically convenient choice directly contradicts the most salient feature of Gein’s verified psychological profile—his crippling social isolation—in favor of narrative accessibility.

The chasm between the historical record and the series’ depiction of Adeline Watkins is best illustrated through a direct comparison:

3.3 Forging a Thematic Parallel: The Ilse Koch Connection

Historical Account

Ilse Koch was the wife of Karl-Otto Koch, the commandant of the Nazi concentration camps at Buchenwald and Majdanek. She gained infamy as the “Bitch of Buchenwald” and was accused of horrific atrocities, most notoriously the allegation that she had prisoners with distinctive tattoos murdered so their skin could be fashioned into lampshades and other household items. The historical connection between Koch and Gein is tenuous and entirely speculative. It is known that Gein was an avid reader of pulp magazines and stories about Nazi atrocities.

Given that Koch’s trial was a major international news story covered by every major U.S. newspaper, it is “entirely possible” that Gein was aware of her and her alleged crimes. The thematic parallel—a shared morbid fascination with crafting objects from human skin—is undeniable. However, the critical historical consensus is that it is “completely unknown what—if any—effect news coverage of Koch had on Gein”. He never made any public mention of her, and no evidence exists to suggest she was a direct inspiration.  

Netflix Series Depiction

The series elevates this speculative connection into a direct causal influence. Ilse Koch (portrayed by Vicky Krieps) is cast as a major character, and a substantial narrative strand is dedicated to depicting her atrocities in lurid detail. The show’s structure heavily implies a direct thematic, if not inspirational, link between Koch’s actions and Gein’s. In the series, it is the fictionalized Adeline Watkins who introduces Gein to Koch’s story through comics and photographs, explicitly inspiring him to make his own objects from human skin. Koch’s narrative is used as a direct juxtaposition to Gein’s, linking his small-town pathology to a globally recognized symbol of systematic evil.  

Analysis of Deviation

This thematic insertion serves to dramatically amplify the perceived scale and significance of Gein’s crimes. Ilse Koch represents a form of organized, ideological, and historically significant horror. By drawing a direct narrative line from her actions at Buchenwald to Gein’s activities on his Wisconsin farm, the series elevates the thematic weight of his behavior. His grotesque creations are no longer presented as the product of a singular, isolated psychosis but are reframed as a symptom of a larger, global current of 20th-century horror.

This narrative choice functions as a structural justification for the show to “linger more gleefully or lasciviously over the worst depredations,” as one critic noted. It allows the depiction of gore to be framed not as mere sensationalism, but as a profound meta-commentary on the universal nature of evil, transforming Gein’s private madness into a public spectacle of historical significance.  

Section IV: Meta-Fictional Layers and Contextual Fidelity

While Monster: The Ed Gein Story engages in profound falsification regarding Gein’s personal relationships and the timeline of his violence, it does maintain a degree of fidelity to the core psychological dynamics of his case. Furthermore, the series incorporates complex and self-referential meta-narrative elements that comment on the very nature of true-crime entertainment, even as it partakes in the genre’s most problematic tendencies.

4.1 Fidelity to the Oedipal Core: The Shadow of Augusta

The most historically sound and psychologically resonant element of the series is its unwavering focus on the influence of Augusta Gein as the foundational source of her son’s pathology. Historical and psychiatric accounts consistently emphasize Augusta’s extreme verbal abuse, her fanatical religious worldview, and the profound misogyny she instilled in Ed, which conditioned him to develop a toxic dependency on her and a crippling fear of all other women.

The series accurately portrays the psychologically devastating impact of her death in 1945 and correctly depicts his subsequent attempt to immortalize her by preserving the parts of the house she used as a shrine. This Oedipal framework is the essential, verifiable context for understanding his eventual criminal motivations. His grave-robbing and murders were, at their core, a grotesque and pathological attempt to “recreate” women or to transform himself into a woman—specifically his mother—using the physical remains of his victims. By anchoring its narrative in this well-documented psychological dynamic, the series maintains a crucial link to the historical truth of Gein’s madness.  

4.2 The Hitchcock Interruption: True Crime as Media Fodder

A significant and unconventional structural choice in the series is the prominent inclusion of a meta-fictional subplot involving historical figures connected to the cultural reception of Gein’s crimes. This narrative thread features director Alfred Hitchcock (portrayed by Tom Hollander), his wife and collaborator Alma Reville, and actor Anthony Perkins (Joey Pollari) during the development and production of the 1960 film Psycho. The film was based on Robert Bloch’s 1959 novel of the same name, which was itself loosely inspired by the Gein case.  

By weaving these Hollywood figures directly into the fabric of the Gein narrative, the show creates a self-referential commentary on the process by which true crime is digested, commodified, and ultimately mythologized by the media machine. These scenes explicitly highlight the direct transition of Gein’s shocking 1957 news story into a cinematic legend. The series uses this device to make a broader statement, suggesting that the cultural reception and artistic transformation of a violent act are as significant as the criminal act itself. It is an attempt to analyze not just the monster, but the creation of the monster’s myth.

4.3 The Externalization of Evil and the Contradiction of Critique

The decision to feature prominent external figures of major historical or cultural weight, such as Ilse Koch and Alfred Hitchcock, serves a unified narrative function: it shifts the causal responsibility for Gein’s behavior away from his unique, internal psychosis and toward external, societal forces. By giving such prominence to the Ilse Koch subplot, the series suggests Gein was not simply mad, but was influenced and perhaps even inspired by the international atrocities of his time. By including the Hitchcock subplot, it suggests his legacy was immediately co-opted, distorted, and defined by the Hollywood entertainment industry. In both cases, the origins of his evil are externalized.

This framing creates a central, glaring contradiction at the heart of the series. On one hand, the show presents itself as a sophisticated critique of society’s obsession with violence and the mechanisms of celebrity crime. It appears to deconstruct the very process of turning a real man into a fictional monster. On the other hand, this meta-critique serves as a convenient distraction from the fact that the series is actively engaging in a far more profound and deliberate restructuring of the primary historical evidence of Gein’s life.

The show critiques the myth-making of Psycho while fabricating murders, relationships, and motivations that Psycho never did. The real, chilling horror of Ed Gein lay in his private, incomprehensible, and isolated sickness. The series attempts to make his sickness understandable by giving it external causes and inspirations. This self-referential layer functions as a defensive narrative strategy. By openly acknowledging that Gein’s story has always been fodder for Hollywood, the show attempts to preemptively insulate itself from the criticism that it is doing the same thing. It is a form of “meta-washing,” where the series purports to deconstruct a trope while, in fact, reinforcing and exaggerating that trope for its own commercial benefit.

Section V: Conclusion: Ethical Implications and the Perpetuation of the Gein Mythos

5.1 Critical Assessment of Moral Standing and Tone

The systematic analysis of the narrative deviations in Monster: The Ed Gein Story confirms that the series functions primarily as a meta-fictional drama that leverages the terrifying legacy of its subject while fundamentally restructuring his life to fit conventional, commercially accessible narrative arcs. This structural choice, which prioritizes dramatic causality over historical fidelity, drew immediate and severe condemnation from media analysts and critics. Reviewers characterized the production as “utterly devoid of morality” and “unforgivable” in its approach. A central criticism was the show’s tendency to “linger more gleefully or lasciviously over the worst depredations” humanity can commit, presenting its graphic violence not with sober analysis but with a tone that bordered on fetishistic.  

The series faced accusations that its primary interest was not historical or psychological exploration but simply bringing an “underexploited piece of true crime estate to market”. Furthermore, critics noted that by manufacturing a tragic backstory—most notably the explicit, invented murder of his brother—the show appears to demand an undue level of sympathy for Gein. It positions him as a product of clear, understandable tragedies rather than confronting the more chilling and complex reality of his random, isolated, and ultimately incomprehensible pathology. This approach was seen as a form of “voyeuristic pandering” to the basest instincts of its audience.  

5.2 The True Cost of Fictionalization: Distortion of Victim and Historical Memory

The primary and most damaging consequence of these extensive narrative fabrications is the severe distortion of historical memory, both of the perpetrator and his victims. The invention of the Henry Gein fratricide and the elaborate, intimate romance with Adeline Watkins fundamentally shifts the narrative focus away from the actual victims of his confirmed crimes, Mary Hogan and Bernice Worden.

It also sidelines the true nature of his core pathology: necrophilia and grave-robbing. Instead of a story about the devastating impact of his crimes on a small community and the unique horror of his compulsions, the narrative becomes centered on the killer’s manufactured interpersonal conflicts, his fictional love life, and his invented struggles. This transforms a story of grotesque isolation and profound mental illness into a familiar and dramatically digestible tragic character study.

The most significant ethical failing of the production is its unwillingness or inability to depict Gein as the figure documented by law enforcement and psychiatrists in 1957: an isolated, socially inept man driven by decades of suppressed, complex mental illness who was ultimately found not guilty by reason of insanity. Dramatists and screenwriters often require clear, understandable causes for horrific actions. The real Ed Gein offers none. His madness was internal, opaque, and deeply private.

By providing convenient, external motivations—the necessity of killing his brother to protect his mother, the emotional pain of a twisted romance, the inspiration from a Nazi war criminal—the series simplifies the nature of his evil. This transformation domesticates a unique and terrifying form of horror, making the “monster” emotionally accessible and psychologically understandable. In doing so, it commits a profound betrayal of the chilling, unadorned, and ultimately incomprehensible historical truth of Edward Gein’s madness.  

5.3 Recommendations for Critical Consumption of True Crime Adaptation

The analysis of Monster: The Ed Gein Story underscores the absolute necessity of critical consumption when engaging with dramatized true-crime media. As this report has demonstrated, entertainment franchises often prioritize dramatic causality—the provision of clean, linear answers for complex and messy evils—over a strict adherence to historical fidelity. This is a choice driven by the commercial demands of narrative storytelling, which often runs counter to the ambiguous and unresolved nature of real-life events.

It is highly recommended that consumers, students, and researchers seeking accurate accounts of historical crimes triangulate the information presented in dramatizations with verified historical sources. This includes consulting primary documents where available, court records, and authoritative biographies, such as those authored by Harold Schechter, to distinguish documented facts from narrative embellishment. While dramatizations may offer a compelling psychological context for certain foundational elements, such as the verifiable impact of Augusta Gein’s misogynistic influence, the decision to invent structurally defining character arcs through fabricated homicides and fictional intimate relationships fundamentally compromises the integrity of the historical record for the purpose of commercial gain.

Such productions should be viewed not as historical documents, but as works of fiction that use historical names and events as a launching point for a narrative constructed to serve the demands of entertainment, not truth. True crime, as a genre, carries a significant ethical burden to do as little harm as possible to the memory of victims and the accuracy of the public record; a burden this series, by all critical and analytical measures, has failed to meet.  

VI. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Works Cited

1. Ed Gein | Research Starters – EBSCO, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/ed-gein
2. Netflix’s new true crime series: The creepy life of serial killer Ed Gein, accessed October 6, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/netflixs-new-true-crime-series-the-creepy-life-of-serial-killer-ed-gein/articleshow/124298645.cms
3. Edward Theodore Gein – Alcatraz East Pigeon Forge, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.alcatrazeast.com/crime-library/serial-killers/edward-theodore-gein/
4. Was Ed Gein a Serial Killer? Here’s Everything We Know About His Victims. – Biography, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.biography.com/crime/a68816465/monster-netflix-ed-gein-victims
5. Ed Gein – Wikipedia, accessed October 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Gein
6. Who Is Ed Gein, Netflix’s New ‘Monster’? – Northeastern Global News, accessed October 6, 2025, https://news.northeastern.edu/2025/09/30/most-influential-serial-killer-ed-gein-netflix-monster/
7. Body of Ed Gein’s final victim, Bernice Worden, is found | November 16, 1957 | HISTORY, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/november-16/ed-gein-kills-final-victim-bernice-worden
8. Sheboygan pathologist helped in Ed Gein case, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.schrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/SP-Ed-Gein.pdf
9. What movies are based on Ed Gein? | Britannica, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/question/What-movies-are-based-on-Ed-Gein
10. 7 Horror Movies Inspired by Body Snatcher Ed Gein – Biography, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.biography.com/crime/a68354560/ed-gein-inspired-horror-movies-and-characters
11. Monster: The Ed Gein Story review – Ryan Murphy’s depravity-loving murder show is unforgivable | Television | The Guardian, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/oct/03/monster-the-ed-gein-story-review-ryan-murphys-depravity-loving-show-is-unforgivable-charlie-hunnam
12. Monster: The Ed Gein Story – Wikipedia, accessed October 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster:_The_Ed_Gein_Story
13. en.wikipedia.org, accessed October 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster:_The_Ed_Gein_Story#:~:text=Upon%20its%20premiere%20on%20October,cultural%20obsession%20with%20true%20crime.
14. How Ed Gein Influenced Other Serial Killers – A&E, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.aetv.com/articles/How-Ed-Gein-Influenced-Some-of-Americas-Biggest-Serial-Killers
15. Who Was Augusta Gein? All About Ed Gein’s Mother in ‘Monster’, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.biography.com/movies-tv/a68021290/who-was-augusta-gein
16. Ed Gein’s Influence: 5 Horror Villains Based on the Killer – A&E, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.aetv.com/articles/ed-gein-pop-culture-characters-inspired-by-butcher-of-plainfield
17. Infamous serial killer Ed Gein dies | July 26, 1984 | HISTORY, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/july-26/real-life-psycho-ed-gein-dies
18. Ed Gein | Story, Movie, Netflix, Monster, Crimes, & Facts | Britannica, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ed-Gein
19. Ed Gein: The Killer & Grave Robber Featured in ‘Monster’ Season 3 – Biography, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.biography.com/crime/ed-gein
20. Ed Gein: The Skin-Suit-Wearing Serial Killer Who Inspired Psycho’s Norman Bates – A&E, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.aetv.com/articles/ed-gein-the-skin-suit-wearing-serial-killer-who-inspired-psychos-norman-bates
21. 5 Facts About Ed Gein – A&E, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.aetv.com/articles/ed-gein-facts
22. Wisconsin Serial Killers and Their Dark Knack for Notoriety – History | HowStuffWorks, accessed October 6, 2025, https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/wisconsin-serial-killers.htm
23. What did police find in Ed Gein’s house during the investigation? – Britannica, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/question/What-did-police-find-in-Ed-Geins-house-during-the-investigation
24. Edward Theodore Gein – Radford University, accessed October 6, 2025, https://maamodt.asp.radford.edu/psyc%20405/serial%20killers/gein,%20ed.pdf
25. Ed Gein’s Childhood: ‘The Butcher of Plainfield’ Fixated on His Domineering Mother – A&E, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.aetv.com/articles/ed-geins-childhood-the-butcher-of-plainfield-fixated-on-his-domineering-mother
26. Did Ed Gein kill his brother? | Britannica, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/question/Did-Ed-Gein-kill-his-brother
27. Did Ed Gein murder his brother Henry in real life? Netflix’s ‘Monster’ reveals dark family secrets, accessed October 6, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-did-ed-gein-murder-his-brother-henry-in-real-life-netflixs-monster-reveals-dark-family-secrets/articleshow/124310834.cms
28. Who Was Adeline Watkins? All About Ed Gein’s Alleged Girlfriend – People.com, accessed October 6, 2025, https://people.com/who-was-adeline-watkins-ed-gein-girlfriend-11821408
29. Adeline Watkins Claimed She Had a 20-Year Romance with Ed Gein. It Was All Untrue., accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.biography.com/movies-tv/a68061591/ed-gein-girlfriend-adeline-watkins-monster-netflix
30. The Real Life Monster Behind Netflix’s Ed Gein Series, Explained – CNET, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/the-real-life-monster-behind-netflixs-ed-gein-series-explained/
31. Adeline Watkins was in long-term relationship with Ed Gein? Monster subject’s disturbing relationship explained, accessed October 6, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-adeline-watkins-was-in-long-term-relationship-with-ed-gein-monster-subjects-disturbing-relationship-explained/articleshow/124310107.cms
32. ‘Monster: The Ed Gein Story’ Hates It Audience Most of All | TIME, accessed October 6, 2025, https://time.com/7323654/monster-ed-gein-adeline/
33. Who Was Ilse Koch? Her Connection to Ed Gein in Netflix’s Monster, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.biography.com/movies-tv/a68812196/monster-the-ed-gein-story-who-was-ilse-koch
34. The True Story of Anthony Perkins, the ‘Psycho’ Actor in Netflix’s ‘Monster: The Ed Gein Story’, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.marieclaire.com/culture/tv-shows/anthony-perkins-monster-the-ed-gein-story/
35. Psycho Becomes Hitchcock’s Most Famous Film | Research Starters …, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/psycho-becomes-hitchcocks-most-famous-film
36. Psycho (1960 film) – Wikipedia, accessed October 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psycho_(1960_film)
37. True Crime Media: The Effects and Ethical Implications of Sensationalism, accessed October 6, 2025, https://journals.flvc.org/LHS/article/view/137003
38. Ethics and True Crime: Setting a Standard for the Genre – PDXScholar, accessed October 6, 2025, https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=eng_bookpubpaper
39. Ed Gein: The Butcher of Plainfield – REAL Crime Scene Locations 4K – YouTube, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaRQrgHtwcA
40. Ed Gein: How ‘Monster’ Killer Inspired Psycho, Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Silence of the Lambs – YouTube, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rogj56HVMLg

⚡︎ Let’s Start A Cult ⚡︎

Subscribe Now. Unholy Trinity Newsletter. Killers. Cults. Crime

We Uncover the Bizarre.

First Name

Email address

Leave this field empty if you're human: