Robert de Middlecote The Mad Monk: Was This England’s First Serial Killer?

Introduction

In the annals of Devon folklore, few tales are as lurid or enduring as that of Robert de Middlecote, the so-called ‘Mad Monk of Haldon Hill’. Local tradition paints a chilling portrait of a 14th-century cleric who, under the guise of piety, lured weary travellers into his remote chapel, only to drug them, slit their throats, and cast their bodies into a well.¹ This sensational narrative has led to the modern, anachronistic claim that Middlecote was the “UK’s first serial killer,” a label that captures the public imagination but demands rigorous historical scrutiny.² The core of this investigation lies in the stark divergence between this macabre legend and the verifiable historical record.

The bedrock of our factual understanding rests almost entirely on a single, invaluable source: the Episcopal Register of John de Grandisson, who served as the Bishop of Exeter from 1327 to 1369.³ This administrative record documents the official charges against Middlecote, providing a crucial, if incomplete, glimpse into the life of a real and dangerous man.² This report seeks to meticulously separate the documented facts of Middlecote’s case from the folkloric embellishments that have accrued over seven centuries. It will place his known crimes within their proper 14th-century legal and social context, explaining the complex interplay between secular and ecclesiastical justice that shaped his fate. Finally, it will critically deconstruct the “first serial killer” designation, analyzing the modern origins of the term and assessing its applicability to a medieval figure.

The enduring power of the Robert de Middlecote story, this report will argue, stems not from a single, monstrous truth, but from a potent fusion of documented clerical criminality with powerful local folklore. This narrative has been continually reshaped by the physical landscape of Devon—the lonely moors and ruined chapels that serve as its stage—and has found new life in the modern appetite for true crime narratives, which often prioritizes a compelling story over historical accuracy.

Part I: The Two Narratives of a Notorious Monk

The story of Robert de Middlecote exists in two distinct forms: a set of documented crimes committed at a chapel in Gidleigh, and a far more gruesome folkloric legend of serial murder centered on the ruins of Lidwell Chapel. An analysis of these two narratives reveals how the account of a real criminal was likely transplanted and transformed into a monstrous myth, a process facilitated by geography, the ambiguities of the historical record, and the community’s need for a more satisfying form of justice.

Section 1.1: The Transgressions at Gidleigh: The Historical Record

The verifiable history of Robert de Middlecote begins not on Haldon Hill, but on the fringes of Dartmoor. In the 1200s, a small, private chapel known as the ‘Chapel of La Wallen’ was constructed just outside the village of Gidleigh, dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary.¹ This chapel was served by nomadic monks, such as Middlecote, who were tasked with maintaining the building and saying daily masses for the local population.⁷

It is here, on March 28, 1328, that the first documented crime occurs. According to the Register of Bishop Grandisson, Robert de Middlecote did “mistreat Agnes at the small chapel”.¹ Later accounts interpret this ecclesiastical euphemism as a brutal assault, specifying that he raped Agnes and murdered her unborn child.¹ The victim is identified as the daughter of Roger the Miller, whose mill was situated near the chapel, grounding the event in the local community.¹

The secular authorities responded swiftly. Middlecote was indicted for trial before the King’s Justice, a man named Thomas de Chageforde.¹ However, before he could be brought to court, the monk escaped. His flight path appears to have been towards the coast, as several reports emerged of houses being burgled for money and food in the area of the river Teign.¹ His freedom was short-lived. A few weeks later, he was apprehended on Haldon Hill, a ridge of high ground southwest of Exeter. It was this capture that earned him the enduring moniker, ‘The Mad Monk of Haldon’.¹

The Gidleigh chapter of the story concludes not with a legal verdict, but with an act of communal fury. Whatever the outcome of Middlecote’s subsequent trial, it clearly displeased the local folk. In that same year, 1328, the community of Gidleigh desecrated the Chapel of La Wallen and left it abandoned, a powerful statement to ensure that “no other unholy men would be welcome among them”.¹ This act of popular justice provides a definitive and historically recorded end to the monk’s association with Gidleigh.

Section 1.2: The Lidwell Legend: A Legacy of Murder and Myth

The second, more infamous narrative shifts the scene to Lidwell Chapel, the ruins of which still stand in a remote and atmospheric spot on Little Haldon, near the towns of Teignmouth and Dawlish.⁵ This 13th-century chapel, possibly once a site of pilgrimage, was associated with a holy well dedicated to “Our Ladye,” the name eventually corrupting to “Lidwell”.¹ Today, the site is marked by a single standing gable wall, surrounded by railings, and is often wet and muddy from a nearby spring, a setting that lends itself perfectly to ghostly tales.⁶

It is here that folklore places the “Mad Monk” after his escape from Gidleigh. The legend presents a man of terrifying duality. By day, he was a seemingly devout and compassionate monk, hearing confessions and serving his small congregation.¹ By night, however, he transformed into a predator. The method described in the folklore is remarkably consistent across various retellings: he would keep a light burning in the chapel to attract weary travellers, offering them food and shelter. The meal would be laced with a soporific drug. Once his guests were unconscious, he would butcher them with a knife, steal their valuables, and dump their corpses down the chapel’s holy well.¹

The legend provides the monk with a suitably dramatic demise. After several years of murder, he chose a sailor as his next victim. The sailor, however, grew suspicious and only pretended to fall asleep. As Middlecote approached with his knife, the sailor fought back, and in the ensuing struggle, the monk was thrown down his own well.¹ Here, the legend splinters. In one version, he simply drowns among the rotting remains of his victims.⁷ In a more elaborate telling, the sailor summons help from a nearby farm. The monk is hauled out alive, but the bucket also brings up decomposing human remains, exposing his crimes. He is handed over to the authorities, tried, and hanged at the Exeter gallows in 1329.¹

Over the centuries, the details of the legend have shifted, as is common with oral tradition. A version recorded in 1850 calls the monk “Simon” and places his crimes in the year 1560.¹¹ Another focuses on the victims being women and children, whose ghosts are said to haunt the well.¹¹ These variations underscore the story’s nature as a fluid piece of folklore rather than a static historical account.

Section 1.3: Reconciling History and Hearsay: The Narrative Transfer

The process by which the documented crimes of Robert de Middlecote at Gidleigh were transplanted and magnified into the legend of Lidwell Chapel was not a random conflation. It was a logical narrative evolution, driven by a combination of geography, the limitations of the historical record, and the psychological need of the local community for a more complete and satisfying form of justice.

The story begins with a verifiable historical anchor: a real, named criminal cleric, Robert de Middlecote, whose transgressions at Gidleigh in 1328 are recorded in an official document.¹ The crucial geographical bridge is Haldon Hill. After escaping from Gidleigh, Middlecote was captured on Haldon Hill, earning him the name ‘The Mad Monk of Haldon’.¹ Lidwell Chapel is also situated on Haldon Hill, providing the essential link that allowed the identity of the “Mad Monk” to become attached to the chapel’s ruins.⁵

This connection was able to take root because of a narrative vacuum in the historical record. The official account of Middlecote’s fate becomes ambiguous after a trial was set for June 1, 1328.¹ While some secondary sources claim he was executed in 1329, the primary register leaves his ultimate fate unclear.⁸ This ambiguity created a space that folklore was perfectly suited to fill. The historical justice meted out would have felt deeply unsatisfying. As will be explored in Part II, the ‘Benefit of Clergy’ that Middlecote claimed likely resulted in a lenient sentence from an ecclesiastical court, an outcome that would have seemed a gross injustice to the laity and the family of his victim. The community’s response at Gidleigh—the desecration of the chapel—was an act of symbolic retribution, but it did not provide the narrative finality of seeing the villain receive his just deserts.¹

Lidwell Chapel, being more remote, ruined, and possessing the sinister feature of a deep holy well, offered a far more atmospheric and frightening stage for a tale of serial murder than an abandoned field in Gidleigh.⁵ The well, in particular, became a potent folkloric device, a perfect, hidden place to dispose of bodies and secrets.¹ Therefore, the Lidwell legend is not simply a historical error. It is a more terrifying, narratively complete, and emotionally satisfying story that grew around the historical nucleus of a real criminal monk. It was transplanted to a more suitable location via a direct geographical link and filled the void left by an ambiguous and unjust historical outcome, providing the grisly end that the official records denied.

Part II: Justice and Transgression in 14th-Century England

To fully comprehend the case of Robert de Middlecote, one must look beyond the narratives and understand the complex legal and social systems of his time. His actions and their consequences were governed by a dual system of justice, rife with overlapping jurisdictions and special privileges that created a chasm between the law as applied to a layman and the law as applied to a cleric.

Section 2.1: The King’s Peace and the Bishop’s Court: A Dual System of Justice

Justice in 14th-century England was a brutal and public affair, designed primarily for retribution, deterrence, and the protection of the community.¹⁵ Law enforcement was largely a local responsibility. In the absence of a professional police force, communities relied on the ‘hue and cry’, where all able-bodied men were expected to join the pursuit of a criminal, and the ‘tithing’ system, a group of ten men mutually responsible for each other’s conduct.¹⁷

This system fed into two distinct court structures. Local manorial courts, overseen by the lord of the manor, dealt with petty crimes and local disputes.¹⁹ More serious crimes—felonies such as murder, arson, and treason—were reserved for the King’s Court. These cases were heard by traveling royal justices who held sessions, known as ‘assizes’, in each county several times a year.¹⁹ Punishment in these secular courts was severe and designed to be a public spectacle. Hanging was the most common form of execution, while treason was met with the particularly gruesome fate of being hanged, drawn, and quartered.¹⁵

Running parallel to this secular system was the jurisdiction of the Church. Ecclesiastical courts, overseen by the local bishop, held authority over moral crimes such as adultery, blasphemy, drunkenness, and heresy, as well as any crime, no matter how serious, committed by an ordained member of the clergy.²¹ The philosophy of these courts was fundamentally different from their secular counterparts. They operated on the principle that punishment should offer a path to reform and the salvation of the soul, viewing punishments motivated by pure retribution as wrong.²¹ Consequently, their sentences were far more lenient. Instead of death, a guilty cleric might be ordered to make a public apology, undertake an enforced pilgrimage, pay a fine, or, in the most serious cases, be defrocked.²⁴ Crucially, the Church courts could not impose the death penalty, creating a stark and often contentious dichotomy in medieval justice.²⁴

Section 2.2: ‘Benefit of Clergy’: A Sacred Shield or a Sinner’s Loophole?

At the heart of the judicial divide was the legal principle of privilegium clericale, or ‘Benefit of Clergy’. This was the right of any cleric accused of a felony in a secular court to have his case transferred to the more lenient ecclesiastical court system.²⁶ Originating in the late Roman Empire, this privilege became a major source of conflict between the Church and the Crown in England, most famously fueling the bitter dispute between King Henry II and Archbishop Thomas Becket in the 12th century.²³

To claim the benefit, an accused person had to prove his clerical status. Initially, this required wearing the tonsure (a shaved haircut) and clerical robes.²⁹ Over time, however, this was replaced by a simple literacy test, as literacy was almost exclusively the domain of the clergy.²⁹ The accused would be asked to read a passage from a Latin Bible. The verse chosen was almost always the first verse of Psalm 51: “

Miserere mei, Deus, secundum magnam misericordiam tuam” (“O God, have mercy upon me, according to thy great mercy”). This passage became grimly known as the “neck verse,” because the ability to recite it could literally save one’s neck from the hangman’s noose.²¹

This system was profoundly open to abuse. By the 14th century, the literacy test had created a loophole that extended the privilege far beyond ordained priests. Any layman who could read—or who had simply memorized the “neck verse”—could claim the benefit.²¹ In 1351, a statute under Edward III formalized this extension, making it possible for a wide range of literate criminals to escape the gallows.²⁹ When Robert de Middlecote claimed Benefit of Clergy after his capture, he was not making an unusual plea; he was employing a standard and often-successful legal strategy available to any man of the cloth facing a felony charge in the king’s court.¹

Section 2.3: The Purgation of Robert de Middlecote: A Trial of Character, Not Fact

The most revealing clue to the actual legal proceedings against Robert de Middlecote comes from a specific entry in Bishop Grandisson’s register. Dated May 15, 1329, it refers to the ‘purgation of Robert de Middlecote’.² This single word, ‘purgation’, is the key to understanding his trial and the likely origin of the monstrous legend that followed.

Modern interpretations have anachronistically described this as an “ecclesiastical murder probe,” projecting contemporary legal concepts onto the past.² In reality, purgation, or compurgation, was a medieval ecclesiastical trial that had little to do with investigating evidence. It was a trial by oath, a test of character and credibility, not of fact.³³ The process was a well-established ritual. The accused cleric (

purgandus) would first swear a solemn oath of his innocence. Following this, a number of “compurgators” or “oath-helpers”—typically twelve men of the same social rank—would be assembled. These men would then swear an oath, not that the accused was factually innocent, but that they believed his oath of innocence was true and that he was a man of good character incapable of the crime.³³ For Middlecote, this would have meant a jury of his peers—other priests—vouching for his credibility.³³ The oath of the accused, when supported by his compurgators, could effectively trump any evidence of guilt.³³

This process fundamentally reframes the story of Middlecote’s trial. Having successfully claimed Benefit of Clergy, he would have been handed over to the bishop’s court. There, the process of purgation would have been initiated. Given the well-documented “fraternal spirit” and institutional leniency of the Church courts, where conviction was rare and judges were predisposed to favor their own, an acquittal was the most probable outcome.²⁷ The historical record’s silence on his fate after the notice of purgation strongly supports the conclusion that he was absolved by the court and either released, quietly transferred to another post, or simply disappeared, his case officially and legally closed.¹

To the lay community of Gidleigh and the family of Agnes, this result would have been an unmitigated outrage. A man accused of rape and the killing of an unborn child was set free because his clerical brothers swore he was a good man. This profound perceived failure of justice is the most powerful motivator for the creation and endurance of a legend in which Middlecote meets a more fittingly gruesome end. The folklore provides the visceral justice that the 14th-century legal system, with its conflicting jurisdictions and clerical privileges, so conspicuously denied.

Section 2.4: A Brotherhood of Transgression: Contextualizing Clerical Crime

While the crimes of Robert de Middlecote were heinous, he was not a complete anomaly in 14th-century England. His actions must be placed within the wider, well-documented context of clerical criminality. The same legal privileges that protected Middlecote also shielded a significant number of other violent and corrupt churchmen. Far from being universally pious, members of the clergy were implicated in the full spectrum of medieval crime, including theft, extortion, rape, and murder. They are known to have joined violent gangs, acted as hired thugs, and abused their sacred positions for personal gain.²⁶ Records from London’s church courts, for instance, show that a significant percentage of defendants charged with sexual crimes were priests.³⁵ The “wicked monk” was a recognizable, if feared, social type.

A comparison with other contemporary cases reveals that Middlecote’s career of violence and his exploitation of legal loopholes were part of a broader pattern of transgression and immunity within the medieval Church.

These cases demonstrate a clear pattern. The Folville and Coterel gangs operated contemporaneously with Middlecote, engaging in organized crime that included kidnapping and murder, yet their leaders often secured royal pardons through military service.³⁷ John of Tintern, a veritable “gangster monk,” committed a breathtaking array of crimes over decades but was repeatedly pardoned, eventually dying of natural causes.³⁸ Other clerics, like William of Alcester and Jordan of Revesby, used the legal mechanism of sanctuary to escape secular justice for homicide.³⁶ This comparative evidence shows that the system that allowed Middlecote to evade harsh punishment was not an exception but a functioning, if deeply flawed, part of the 14th-century legal landscape. The public outrage that likely fueled his legend was a reaction not just to one man’s evil, but to a system that regularly appeared to place criminal clerics beyond the reach of meaningful justice.

Part III: The Anatomy of a “First Serial Killer”

The modern branding of Robert de Middlecote as the “UK’s first serial killer” is a sensational claim that requires careful deconstruction. This label, born of 20th-century criminology and popularized by mass media, carries specific connotations that may not be applicable to a 14th-century figure. A critical examination of the term itself, alongside other historical contenders, reveals that the designation is anachronistic and ultimately obscures the more complex historical reality of the case.

Section 3.1: Defining the Phenomenon: The Modern Concept of the Serial Killer

The term “serial killer” is a relatively modern invention. It was popularized in the 1970s by FBI agent Robert Ressler and entered the common vocabulary in the 1980s during a period of intense media focus on such crimes.³⁹ Criminological definitions, though varying slightly, share core components. A serial killer is generally defined as an individual who commits two or more (often a minimum of three is cited) murders over a period of time, with a distinct “cooling-off” period of emotional respite between the killings.^{39 This pattern distinguishes the serial killer from a mass murderer, who kills multiple people in a single event, and a spree killer, who kills in multiple locations over a short period without a cooling-off phase.}

Crucially, the concept of the serial killer is as much a cultural and media construct as it is a criminal category.³⁹ The archetypal case is that of Jack the Ripper. The series of brutal murders in London’s Whitechapel district in 1888 occurred at a time of rising mass-circulation newspapers. The unprecedented media coverage created and sustained the public image of a single, monstrous predator, giving him his famous name and pioneering many of the investigative and media tropes that still define the genre today.⁴¹ The rise of the serial killer as a figure in the public consciousness is inextricably linked to the technological and social means to create a serialized narrative of terror, satisfying a public fascination with such stories.³⁹

Section 3.2: A Parade of Predecessors: Contenders for a Macabre Title

The debate over the “first” serial killer is fraught with complexity, as it involves applying this modern, media-dependent label to vastly different historical contexts. Several figures from history challenge any simple claim to the title.

• Gilles de Rais (15th-Century France): A French baron and comrade-in-arms of Joan of Arc, Gilles de Rais was executed in 1440 for the sadistic torture and murder of more than 100 children. His case, documented in trial records, arguably represents the earliest well-documented instance of a killer fitting the modern psychological profile, though his confession was extracted under threat of torture.⁴⁰ His crimes were understood by his contemporaries not through a lens of criminal psychology, but as a monstrous perversion of his noble status, intertwined with accusations of heresy and alchemy.
• Mary Ann Cotton (19th-Century England): Executed in 1873, Mary Ann Cotton is a strong contender for Britain’s first modern serial killer. She was convicted of poisoning her stepson with arsenic but is suspected of killing as many as 21 people, including three of her four husbands and many of her own children, primarily for insurance money.⁴¹ Her crimes predated Jack the Ripper’s, but were initially obscured by the high infant mortality rates of the era and the prevalence of gastric illnesses whose symptoms mimicked arsenic poisoning. She was seen as a “poisoner,” a recognized criminal type, but not yet the cultural archetype of a “serial killer”.⁴¹
• Jack the Ripper (1888 London): The figure most often given the title, Jack the Ripper’s case is defined less by being the first instance of such crimes and more by being the first instance of the modern reaction to them. The intense media frenzy, the creation of a terrifying persona, the public letters, and the massive police manhunt established the template for how society would perceive and react to serial murder for the next century and beyond.³⁹

These cases are not equivalent phenomena. Each was understood and processed differently by its contemporary society. Applying the single label “serial killer” to all of them risks erasing these crucial historical distinctions. The question of who was “first” is less a matter of historical occurrence and more a matter of modern classification and the moment when media and society began to construct this specific criminal archetype.

Section 3.3: The Verdict on Robert de Middlecote

When the modern definition of a serial killer is applied to the two distinct versions of the Robert de Middlecote story, the conclusion is clear.

The historical Robert de Middlecote, as documented in Bishop Grandisson’s Register, was a violent and dangerous felon. The charges against him were rape, the murder of an unborn child (a single homicidal event), and multiple robberies.¹ While these are horrific crimes, they do not fit the specific criminological pattern of serial murder—multiple killings separated by a cooling-off period. Based on the verifiable evidence, he was a rapist, a killer, and a thief, but not a serial killer in the modern sense.

The legendary Robert de Middlecote, the menacing figure of Lidwell Chapel, is another matter entirely. This folkloric tale describes a predatory killer who repeatedly lures, drugs, robs, and murders victims over a period of “several years,” employing a consistent modus operandi.¹ This narrative fits the modern definition of a serial killer perfectly. He is a methodical, repetitive murderer who preys on a specific victim type (travellers) from a fixed location.

Therefore, the claim that Robert de Middlecote is the “UK’s first serial killer” is an anachronistic misnomer. It arises from the conflation of a historical criminal with a later, more sensational legend that was likely created to provide a more satisfying conclusion to his story. The legend is that of a serial killer; the historical man was a different, though no less disturbing, kind of criminal. His case is far more revealing of the realities of 14th-century justice and clerical corruption than it is of modern criminal psychology. The “serial killer” label serves as a modern media hook that ultimately obscures a more fascinating and complex historical truth.²

Conclusion and Recommendations

Summary of Findings

This investigation has demonstrated that the story of Robert de Middlecote is a complex tapestry woven from historical fact and potent folklore. The historical record, primarily the Register of Bishop John de Grandisson, confirms that Middlecote was a real 14th-century monk who committed heinous crimes at Gidleigh, including rape, infanticide, and robbery. His case was adjudicated within the unique legal framework of medieval England, where his claim to ‘Benefit of Clergy’ led him to an ecclesiastical trial. The record of his ‘purgation’ indicates he underwent a trial by compurgation—a test of character, not evidence—which most likely resulted in his absolution and disappearance from official history.

The sensational tale of a predatory serial killer operating from Lidwell Chapel is a powerful local legend, almost certainly grafted onto the historical record of this real cleric. The narrative transfer was facilitated by the geographical link of Haldon Hill, the ambiguity of Middlecote’s ultimate fate, and a profound communal dissatisfaction with the justice delivered by the Church courts. The legend provided a form of narrative retribution that the official legal system failed to deliver.

Final Assessment

The popular claim that Robert de Middlecote is the “UK’s first serial killer” is more a reflection of a modern fascination with the true-crime archetype than a historically defensible statement. The label fits the legend, not the man. He is more accurately and more valuably understood as a stark example of the violent realities of medieval life and the complex, often contradictory, role the Church played in both harboring criminals and administering its own form of justice. His story is not about the dawn of serial murder, but about the deep chasm that existed between secular and ecclesiastical power, and between official justice and popular memory.

Recommendations for Further Research

To advance the understanding of this case and its context, the following actions are recommended:

1. Primary Source Re-examination: A new scholarly initiative should be undertaken to produce a full, modern transcription and English translation of the relevant folios from the original manuscript of Bishop Grandisson’s Register, now held at the Devon Heritage Centre.³ The existing 19th-century summaries are incomplete, and direct access to the original Latin text concerning Middlecote’s purgation is critical to move beyond speculation and potentially uncover more detail about the charges and the trial. The current digital availability of the register is fragmented and does not provide clear access to the specific pages cited in secondary sources.⁴⁷
2. Targeted Archaeological Survey: A non-invasive geophysical survey, potentially followed by a targeted archaeological excavation, should be conducted at the site of Lidwell Chapel (National Grid Reference: SX 92411 76098).⁶ The primary objective would be to locate the historical position of the chapel’s well, which is central to the legend but is currently obscured.⁵ While unlikely to yield definitive proof of the legend’s veracity, any findings—such as the well’s dimensions, contents, or even its absence—would add a crucial physical dimension to the study of how the legend formed.
3. Folkloric and Toponymic Study: A comparative academic study should be commissioned to analyze the folklore surrounding Lidwell Chapel in relation to other “killer cleric” legends in Devon and the wider South West. This should be combined with a toponymic (place-name) analysis of “La Wallen” (Gidleigh) and “Lidwell” to trace the narrative’s geographical and linguistic evolution, shedding light on how and why stories of clerical crime became attached to specific locations.

Works cited

1. Mad Monk – Legendary Dartmoor, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.legendarydartmoor.co.uk/2016/03/28/mad_monk/
2. The killer monk who terrorised Exeter on lonely hill – Devon Live, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/killer-monk-who-terrorised-exeter-8912432
3. Schools of clerks, schools of knights: John Grandisson and Hugh de Courtenay’s French correspondence, 1329–40 – Oxford Academic, accessed July 23, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/histres/article/97/276/280/7613904
4. ‘Despite the Prohibition of the Lord Bishop’: John Grandiss – Brepols Online, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/pdf/10.1484/M.MCS-EB.5.114265?download=true
5. Lidwell Chapel – Wikipedia, accessed July 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lidwell_Chapel
6. Results – Heritage Gateway, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/Gateway/Results_Single.aspx?uid=MDV9787&resourceID=104
7. Storyteller: The mad monk of Haldon Hill – Torbay Weekly, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.torbayweekly.co.uk/news/local-news/1226837/storyteller-the-mad-monk-of-haldon-hill.html
8. On the Trail of Ted Hughes and Robert de Middlecote, accessed July 23, 2025, http://deborahharvey.blogspot.com/2014/08/on-trail-of-ted-hughes-and-robert-de.html
9. Haldon Hills – Wikipedia, accessed July 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haldon_Hills
10. The Monk of Haldon | Teignmouth in Verse – WordPress.com, accessed July 23, 2025, https://keatsghost.wordpress.com/2014/12/11/the-monk-of-haldon/
11. Lidwell Chapel and The Monk of Haldon | Teignmouth in Verse – WordPress.com, accessed July 23, 2025, https://keatsghost.wordpress.com/connections/places/lidwell-chapel-and-the-monk-of-haldon/
12. Lidwell Holy Well or Sacred Spring – The Megalithic Portal, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=8334
13. REMAINS OF LIDWELL CHAPEL SITUATED ABOUT 1/4 MILE FROM LIDWELL FARM ACROSS CHAPEL FIELD, Dawlish – 1334486 | Historic England, accessed July 23, 2025, https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1334486
14. Lidwell Chapel Dawlish – A 13th Century Ruin – YouTube, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXBbJ7KL90E
15. Punishments in Medieval England (Edexcel GCSE History): Revision Note – Save My Exams, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.savemyexams.com/gcse/history/edexcel/24/the-thematic-historic-environment-paper-1/revision-notes/crime-punishment-in-britain-c1000-present/c1000-c1500-crime-punishment-in-medieval-england/punishments-in-medieval-england/
16. www.savemyexams.com, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.savemyexams.com/gcse/history/edexcel/24/the-thematic-historic-environment-paper-1/revision-notes/crime-punishment-in-britain-c1000-present/c1000-c1500-crime-punishment-in-medieval-england/punishments-in-medieval-england/#:~:text=Throughout%20the%20medieval%20era%2C%20the,pillory%2C%20humiliated%20criminals%20in%20public.
17. Medieval Law and Order – Crimes, Punishments, History, accessed July 23, 2025, https://schoolhistory.co.uk/medieval/medieval-law-and-order-facts/
18. Crime and Punishment – Medieval World – Reading Museum, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.readingmuseum.org.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/Fact%20Sheet%20-%20Medieval%204_compressed.pdf
19. Medieval Punishment: Crimes and Torture – History on the Net, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.historyonthenet.com/medieval-life-crime-and-medieval-punishment
20. 7. Crime & Punishment – Great Torrington, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.great-torrington.uk/heritagetrail-crimepunishment/
21. 1.4 Case study: the influence of the Church on crime – and punishment – The Chalfonts Community College, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.chalfonts.org/_site/data/files/users/C35DA48F36DFAA34C59DAB298E50BE83.pdf
22. Court Depositions of South West England, 1500-1700 – University of Exeter, accessed July 23, 2025, https://humanities-research.exeter.ac.uk/womenswork/courtdepositions/
23. The Influence of the Church on 13th Century On Crime & Punishment: Case Study (Edexcel GCSE History): Revision Note – Save My Exams, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.savemyexams.com/gcse/history/edexcel/18/revision-notes/crime-and-punishment-in-britain-c1000-present/c1000-c1500-crime-and-punishment-in-medieval-england/the-influence-of-the-church-on-13th-century-on-crime-and-punishment-case-study/
24. The Church – History: Edexcel GCSE Crime & Punishment – Seneca, accessed July 23, 2025, https://senecalearning.com/en-GB/revision-notes/gcse/history/edexcel/crime-and-punishment/1-3-1-the-church
25. Church Courts | A Writer’s Perspective – WordPress.com, accessed July 23, 2025, https://aprilmunday.wordpress.com/2018/02/04/church-courts/
26. Getting Away With Murder: Criminal Clerics in Late Medieval …, accessed July 23, 2025, https://he.kendallhunt.com/product/getting-away-murder-criminal-clerics-late-medieval-england
27. Benefit of Clergy–A Legal Anomaly – UKnowledge, accessed July 23, 2025, https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4977&context=klj
28. Thomas Becket: the murder that shook the Middle Ages | British Museum, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.britishmuseum.org/blog/thomas-becket-murder-shook-middle-ages
29. Benefit of clergy – Wikipedia, accessed July 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benefit_of_clergy
30. Benefit of clergy – Engole, accessed July 23, 2025, https://engole.info/benefit-of-clergy/
31. Here knightly combat is being used to decide who is in the right. How did Medieval justice work?, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.abdn.ac.uk/sll/disciplines/english/lion/justice.shtml
32. The Church and the Law in Late Medieval England – GCSE History by Clever Lili, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.gcsehistory.com/faq/churchmedievaleng.html
33. Good Friends or Neighbors: Compurgators in Medieval Times | In …, accessed July 23, 2025, https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2018/08/good-friends-or-neighbors-compurgators-in-medieval-times/
34. Compurgation – Wikipedia, accessed July 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compurgation
35. The Courts Christian in Medieval England – St. John’s Law Scholarship Repository, accessed July 23, 2025, https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2399&context=tcl
36. Could Priests Claim Sanctuary in Medieval England? – Legal …, accessed July 23, 2025, https://legalhistorymiscellany.com/2019/05/16/could-priests-claim-sanctuary-in-medieval-england/
37. Coterel gang – Wikipedia, accessed July 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coterel_gang
38. The atrocities of a medieval “gangster” monk in England revealed – Vijesti, accessed July 23, 2025, https://en.vijesti.me/amp/688440/revealed-the-atrocities-of-the-medieval-monk-gangster-in-England
39. Serial Killing and Representation | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology, accessed July 23, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/criminology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-117?d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780190264079.001.0001%2Facrefore-9780190264079-e-117&p=emailASgvOgYXSbddU
40. Gilles de Rais: History’s First Serial Killer? | Britannica, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/story/gilles-de-rais-historys-first-serial-killer
41. Jack the Ripper: Britain’s First Serial Killer? – Blog, accessed July 23, 2025, https://thejacktherippertour.com/blog/was-jack-the-ripper-truly-britains-first-serial-killer/
42. Jack the Ripper – Wikipedia, accessed July 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_the_Ripper
43. en.wikipedia.org, accessed July 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_killer#:~:text=The%20unidentified%20killer%20Jack%20the,criminal%20investigation%20techniques%20were%20pioneered.
44. List of serial killers | Names, Country of Origin, & Definition | Britannica, accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/list-of-serial-killers-2026519
45. Britain’s Most Notorious Serial Killers – JackTheRipper, accessed July 23, 2025, https://thejacktherippertour.com/blog/britains-most-notorious-serial-killers/
46. The register of John de Grandisson, bishop of Exeter, (A. D. 1327-1369) – Internet Archive, accessed July 23, 2025, https://archive.org/details/registerofjohnde03exet
47. Full text of “The register of John de Grandisson, bishop of Exeter, (A. D. 1327-1369) ..”, accessed July 23, 2025, https://archive.org/stream/registerjohndeg00abbegoog/registerjohndeg00abbegoog_djvu.txt
48. Full text of “The register of John de Grandisson, bishop of Exeter …, accessed July 23, 2025, https://archive.org/stream/registerofjohnde03exet/registerofjohnde03exet_djvu.txt

⚡︎ Let’s Start A Cult ⚡︎

Subscribe Now. Unholy Trinity Newsletter. Killers. Cults. Crime

We Uncover the Bizarre.

First Name

Email address

Leave this field empty if you're human: