Folie à Deux ♡ When Delusions Love Company

Ever Heard Of A Madness For Two?

No, it’s not the title of a gothic romance, but a rather fascinating and unsettling psychological phenomenon known as Folie à Deux. Coined by the French, with their typical knack for dramatic accuracy, it literally translates to “madness of two.” Forget the solitary figure grappling with delusions; this is about a shared psychosis, a psychological ailment that seemingly jumps from one mind to another, usually within a close, isolated relationship. One individual’s distorted reality doesn’t just stay put—it finds a receptive host, crafting a mutual, nightmarish bubble.

Imagine this: one person, the “primary,” is already navigating their own psychotic landscape. Through an insidious process, their delusions begin to seep into a “secondary” individual. This recipient is often someone dependent, perhaps isolated, and inherently more vulnerable. This shared insanity is cultivated in the intense environment of their relationship, frequently sealed off from outside perspectives that might offer a reality check. And it’s not strictly a twosome. When the delusion ropes in more members, the terms simply adjust: folie à trois, folie à quatre, or even folie en famille (family madness). A group-endorsed delusion – quite the alternative to your average book club.

This isn’t just a curious footnote in psychiatric textbooks. Folie à Deux serves as a stark reminder of the profound power of human relationships, the malleability of reality under suggestion, and the psychological toll of isolation. It challenges the notion of psychosis as a purely individual affliction. If delusions can be “transmitted,” the social dynamics and environment become as critical to understand as individual neurochemistry. The very concept of a shared madness, a disturbing duet of delusion, is what makes this phenomenon so profoundly compelling and, frankly, a bit chilling. It’s a glimpse into the darker potential of human connection, where interdependence can warp into a shared psychotic state.

A History Etched in Shared Realities

The concept of shared insanity isn’t new, having been a topic of discussion in European psychiatric circles since the 19th century. It was French psychiatrists Charles Lasègue and Jean-Pierre Falret who, in 1877, formally described “folie à deux.” Their work detailed the classic scenario: a more dominant individual, harboring delusions, systematically imposing their distorted worldview onto a more passive, receptive partner, typically within a claustrophobic and isolated setting. They weren’t just labeling; they were identifying the toxic relational ingredients.

Fast forward to the 1940s, American psychiatrist Richard Gralnick attempted to further classify these shared psychotic states, proposing types such as “imposed psychosis.” While diagnostic manuals like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) have historically wrestled with its placement – sometimes granting it status as “Shared Psychotic Disorder” – the most recent iteration, DSM-5, largely absorbed it into “Other specified schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorder.” This move, however, hasn’t erased the descriptive power of “folie à deux,” a term that continues to resonate due to its vivid portrayal of one mind influencing another into a shared delusional state.

Living in the Delusional Duet: The Clinical Snapshot

At its core, Folie à Deux is a psychological drama starring two or more individuals locked in an intense, often codependent relationship. The plot? They come to share the exact same delusional script. The “secondary” character’s lines are essentially fed to them by the “primary,” who’s already living deep within their own psychotic narrative. And we’re not talking about quirky opinions or fleeting fancies here; these are iron-clad, false beliefs that no amount of reason or contradictory evidence can shake.

The greatest hits of their delusional repertoire often feature persecutory themes – the classic “the world is against us” storyline. Ironically, this shared paranoia can superglue their bond, making them an even tighter unit against a perceived hostile universe. They might be convinced they’re the targets of shadowy government plots, figures of divine importance on a cosmic mission, or suffering from some bizarre, medically impossible ailment that, naturally, they both share.

One of the truly unsettling psychological twists is how normal these individuals can appear when you’re not treading on the sacred ground of their shared delusion. They can chat, work, and go about their day with an air of perfect lucidity. But broach the topic, and the mask drops. You get a sudden, chilling glimpse into their hermetically sealed, irrational world. Their conviction is absolute, defended with a fervor – be it anxious or euphoric – that perfectly matches the delusion’s emotional temperature. The primary, the original author of this madness, rarely sees themselves as the villain of the piece. In their warped reality, they’re sharing a profound truth, an urgent revelation, perhaps even “protecting” their partner. It’s a grotesque distortion of care and intimacy.

And sometimes, this isn’t just a script for a bizarre play; it’s a blueprint for danger. These shared beliefs can, alarmingly, escalate to include homicidal or suicidal pacts, all built on the bedrock of their unshakeable, false reality. The psychosis is often “encapsulated”—meaning it’s laser-focused on the shared theme while other cognitive gears seem to turn relatively smoothly. This makes it all the more insidious, harder to spot, and potentially devastating when the delusion finally demands action.

Untangling the Shared Mind: The Diagnostic Puzzle

Trying to officially pin down Folie à Deux isn’t like diagnosing a straightforward illness; it’s more like trying to untangle a deeply knotted psychological fishing line involving at least two people. The first step, naturally, is to rule out the usual suspects that can mimic psychosis – drugs, booze, brain tumors, or other medical curveballs. But the real Herculean task for any clinician is recognizing that the delusion isn’t just one person’s private mental property; it’s a shared infection, often incubated and fiercely maintained by the dynamics of the relationship itself.

Now, how the official diagnostic manuals categorize this has been a bit of a moving target. The DSM-5, for instance, largely nudged “Shared Psychotic Disorder” off its dedicated perch, tucking it into broader categories. This means clinicians have to be extra sharp to spot the interpersonal contagion, lest they treat the “secondary” in isolation, missing the crucial fact that their beliefs were essentially downloaded from a dominant, delusional partner. The World Health Organization’s ICD-10, it’s worth noting, still gives it a nod with “Induced Delusional Disorder,” highlighting that the global psychiatric community recognizes this unique relational pathology.

But beyond the labels, the core clinical challenge is to decipher the secondary’s true psychological state. Are they a genuine convert to the primary’s warped reality, their own mind now fertile ground for the delusion? Or are they, in a sense, a psychological hostage, merely echoing the madness to survive an overwhelmingly influential, perhaps even abusive, relationship? Sometimes, even if separated from the primary instigator, the secondary’s delusions stubbornly persist, a chilling testament to how deeply a shared belief, however bizarre, can take root. Folie à Deux remains a stark, fascinating, and often tragic illustration of one human mind’s astonishing power to reshape another’s, twisting the very fabric of their shared world.

Table 1: Evolution of Diagnostic Classification of Folie à Deux (DSM & ICD)

Era/Manual	Terminology Used	Key Diagnostic Features/Notes
19th Century (Lasegue & Falret)	Folie à Deux / Folie Communiquée	Descriptive accounts, emphasis on dyadic relationship, primary individual imposing delusion on secondary.
DSM-III	Shared Paranoid Disorder	Formal inclusion in the diagnostic manual.
DSM-IV-TR	Shared Psychotic Disorder (297.3)	Specific criteria established, including similarity of delusional content between primary and secondary individuals.
ICD-10	Induced Delusional Disorder (F24)	Retains a specific category for the disorder, emphasizing the induced nature of the delusion.
DSM-5	No distinct category; classified under Other Specified Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorder (298.8 Delusional symptoms in partner…) / Delusional Disorder	Subsumed into broader categories, with a focus on the relational context and the nature of the delusional symptoms in the partner.

The Cast of Characters: Subtypes in the Theater of Delusion

While the diagnostic manuals have shuffled Folie à Deux around like an unwanted houseguest, psychiatrist Alexander Gralnick, way back in 1942, gave us a rather handy set of character sketches, or subtypes. These aren’t rigid boxes but more like different scripts for how one person’s unreality can hijack another’s. Understanding these helps map the psychological terrain of these shared nightmares.

Across all these subtypes, the most common delusional themes tend to be of the persecutory (“everyone’s out to get us!”) or grandiose (“we’re incredibly special/on a divine mission!”) variety. The former, especially, acts like a perverse glue, welding the pair together against a perceived hostile world.

The psychological implications of these distinctions are significant. The difference in outcome upon separation between folie imposée and folie communiquée, for instance, paints a vivid picture of how deeply a delusion can be absorbed. In one, it’s like a coat easily shed; in the other, it’s become skin-graft. Folie simultanée challenges any simple dominant-submissive explanation, pointing instead to a complex dance of shared vulnerability and mutual reinforcement. And folie induite shows us the disturbing power of social influence even on minds already grappling with psychosis.

Essentially, Gralnick’s subtypes offer a window into the different ways human connection, isolation, and individual vulnerability can conspire to create a shared, albeit shattered, reality.

The following table summarizes Gralnick’s subtypes:

Table 2: Subtypes of Folie à Deux (Gralnick’s Classification)

Subtype	Description	Key Differentiator(s)	Outcome upon Separation of Dyad
Folie Imposée	Primary (psychotic) imposes delusion on secondary (initially non-psychotic) in a close relationship.	Secondary is initially non-psychotic; delusion is directly imposed.	Delusion in the secondary individual usually resolves or significantly diminishes.
Folie Simultanée	Simultaneous development of psychosis and shared delusions in two closely associated, predisposed individuals.	Mutual influence or triggering of symptoms; often a shared predisposition to psychosis.	May not resolve in either individual; separation may not be effective.
Folie Communiquée	Secondary adopts primary’s delusion after a period of resistance.	Secondary resists the delusion initially, then accepts and internalizes it.	Delusion in the secondary individual often persists even after separation from the primary.
Folie Induite	An individual with a pre-existing psychosis adopts new or additional delusions from another psychotic individual.	Both individuals are psychotic; new delusions are added to an existing psychotic state.	Outcome depends on the individual courses of psychosis in both individuals; separation is key.

The Relationship Crucible: Where Realities Merge

The absolute bedrock of Folie à Deux is the relationship dynamic. We’re talking about connections that are intense, long-haul, and often suffocatingly close – think of a psychological pressure cooker. Most often, these delusional duets blossom within families: spouses, siblings, or a parent tethered to a child. Within this hothouse environment, social isolation acts like a powerful accelerant.

When individuals are walled off, whether by choice or circumstance, from the broader world, they lose those crucial reality checks that diverse social interactions naturally provide. Their shared bubble doesn’t just become a world; it becomes the world. And if one person’s perception of that world starts to warp, there’s no dissenting voice, no alternative viewpoint to challenge the emerging distortion. It’s an echo chamber, perfectly engineered for a custom-built delusion to take hold and flourish.

A recurring theme in these intense pairings is the dominant-submissive tango. The “primary” – the original architect of the delusion – often presents as the more assertive, rigid, perhaps even charismatic one. They are the conductor of this particular orchestra of unreality. The “secondary,” by contrast, is frequently cast in a more passive, suggestible role, sometimes appearing emotionally younger or more overtly dependent. Crucially, this isn’t usually about a simple deficit in the secondary’s intelligence. Instead, it’s often a complex tapestry of emotional or psychological reliance that makes them incredibly susceptible. They might initially nod along to the primary’s outlandish beliefs not out of genuine conviction, but as a desperate, unconscious bid to maintain a vital, albeit increasingly twisted, connection. The delusion becomes the price of admission, the shared secret that binds them.

The Psychological Blueprint: Who’s Who in the Folie à Deux?

Beyond the relational hothouse, the individual psychological landscapes of both the primary and secondary players are critical.

The Primary Player (The Delusion Originator)

This individual is typically the one with a pre-existing psychotic condition already simmering – think schizophrenia, a persistent delusional disorder, or a mood disorder that’s decided to bring along psychotic features for the ride. Their grip on reality is compromised before the shared experience begins. They aren’t just casually entertaining an odd idea; they possess an unshakeable conviction in their distorted view of the world. Their delusion is the “seed” from which the shared psychosis will sprout. While their personality might be forceful or persuasive, the defining feature is the intensity and fixedness of their primary delusion.

The Secondary Player (The Delusion Adopter)

Here’s where the psychological profile gets fascinatingly complex, as this individual isn’t necessarily “psychotic” at the outset. Their vulnerability is usually a blend of factors. They are often described as highly suggestible and may have a personality structure that leans towards dependency. Think of someone who, perhaps due to past experiences or innate temperament, has a profound need for attachment, validation, or a sense of direction from another. This isn’t about being unintelligent; in fact, some secondaries are of average or even above-average intellect. Rather, their emotional architecture makes them more porous to the influence of a dominant, convinced personality, especially in an isolated context. Personality traits like passivity, introversion, or even schizoid tendencies (a preference for solitude that deepens the isolation) can be common. Sometimes, the secondary might have their own underlying mental health struggles, like anxiety, depression, or a different, less encompassing personality disorder, which can lower their defenses against the primary’s more powerful delusional framework. For them, adopting the delusion might be a deeply unconscious strategy to preserve the relationship, avoid abandonment, or even to find a shared meaning or explanation for distressing life circumstances, however bizarre that explanation might be.

It’s this potent interplay – the primary’s unwavering delusion meeting the secondary’s unique blend of dependency and suggestibility, all fermenting within an isolated and intense relational crucible – that sets the stage for Folie à Deux. Other factors, like shared stressful life events or even a genetic predisposition to mental illness within a family, can further till the soil, making it even more fertile for these shared realities to take root.

When Delusion Walks Off the Page: Real-Life Snapshots

Case Description	Key Elements of Folie à Deux Illustrated	Relationship Type	Outcome/Significance
The Eriksson Twins (M6 Motorway Madness)	Shared extreme, dangerous behavior (running into motorway traffic); primary (Ursula) influencing secondary (Sabina); legal defense of Folie à Deux in subsequent murder trial. 1	Identical Twin Sisters	Highlights potential for extreme violence, legal complexities in assigning responsibility, and the potent influence within identical twin bonds. Case remains controversial with alternative theories. 1
“Brothers on Big Brother” (Male Identical Twins)	Folie imposée within a close familial setting; shared delusions. 4	Identical Twin Brothers	Separation and treatment of one twin led to weakening of his delusions, while the untreated twin presumably maintained them, demonstrating the impact of severing the pathological link. 4
The Isolated Couple and Their “Shared Illness” (Somatic Delusions)	Long-term isolated relationship; primary (older male partner) with complex somatic delusions; secondary (younger, dependent female partner) gradually adopting identical beliefs; joint resistance to psychiatric interpretation. 5	Unmarried Couple (significant age difference)	Illustrates profound conviction, elaborate co-construction of delusional systems, and strong resistance to external insight in a dependent, isolated dyad. 5
The Grieving Mother and Daughter (Persecution Born of Loss)	Increased isolation following shared trauma (family deaths); development of shared persecutory delusions about neighbors and authorities; mutual reinforcement of beliefs. 6	Mother and Adult Daughter	Underscores how shared trauma and social withdrawal can create fertile ground for Folie à Deux, with delusions serving as an explanatory framework for misfortune. 6
Adolescent Echoes (The “Voice” in the Peer Group)	Adolescent female reporting auditory hallucinations with content similar to that of friends also accessing mental health services (potential primaries). 1	Adolescent Peer Group	Symptoms resolved after separation from the peer group and forming new friendships, suggesting the dynamic can occur in younger social circles and the effectiveness of environmental change. 1

Abstract descriptions are one thing, but the human stories behind Folie à Deux truly illuminate its bizarre and often tragic nature. These aren’t just case file numbers; they’re glimpses into minds and relationships gone profoundly awry.

Folie à Deux: The Pop Culture Obsession

It’s hardly surprising that Folie à Deux, with its built-in drama of intertwined minds and fractured realities, has become a recurring fascination in popular culture. The idea of madness being contagious, of one person’s inner world bleeding into another’s, is potent stuff for storytelling.

Cultural Product	Example	Key Themes/Elements of Folie à Deux Explored	Notes on Clinical Accuracy/Cultural Impact
Film	Joker: Folie à Deux (2024)	Shared delusions between Arthur Fleck (Joker) and Harley Quinn; mutual reinforcement of a fantasy world; disconnect from reality; codependency. 1	Uses Folie à Deux as a lens for extreme romance and shared rebellion; explores how one disturbed individual (primary) can influence a vulnerable professional (secondary). The film’s musical numbers represent the disconnect from reality. 1 Focuses on the psychological impact rather than strict clinical portrayal; highlights how Lee (Harley) idolizes the “Joker” persona. 1
Film	Heavenly Creatures (1994)	Intense, insular world of two teenage girls; shared elaborate fantasies; alienation from the outside world leading to a shared reality where moral boundaries dissolve; culminating in murder. 3	Based on a true story (Parker-Hulme case). 4 Depicts how an exclusive, hyper-romanticized friendship can become a dangerous shared reality. 5
Film	Bug (2006)	A lonely woman and a paranoid drifter descend into shared delusions about a government-orchestrated insect infestation; escalating paranoia and self-destruction. 3	Portrays how loneliness and vulnerability can make one susceptible to another’s paranoia. Some interpretations see it as a metaphor for technological invasion, while others view it as a direct depiction of Folie à Deux, possibly intensified by substance use (though this is debated). 6
Literature	Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (Edward Albee)	George and Martha’s shared, elaborate fiction of an imaginary son; their shared “delusion” as the toxic glue in their fractured marriage; a mutual defense against unbearable reality. 7	While not a clinical diagnosis in the play, it strongly resonates with the psychological dynamics of Folie à Deux. The play explores illusion versus reality and critiques societal expectations. 7
Literature	Open Heart (Frederick Buechner, 1972)	Contains an evocative description of Folie à Deux: “a state of things where a person’s hallucination becomes so intense that he can give it to somebody else like measles and the two of them start hallucinating1 together.” 10	Illustrates the core concept of shared delusion in an accessible, metaphorical way. 10
Television	Six Feet Under (2004 episode)	Character George Sibley defines Folie à Deux as: “Two people confusing a momentary insanity for love.” 10	Shows the term being used figuratively to describe a romantic relationship perceived as a shared delusion. 10

Drawing the Curtains: Reflections on Delusion’s Duet

Folie à Deux, in its unsettling glory, starkly reveals how human connection can twist, making our socially shaped reality a casualty when an inner circle becomes a closed, delusional loop. The journey to understand this profound distortion—from early descriptions to psychological profiling of the dominant, psychotic “primary” and the vulnerable, suggestible “secondary”—highlights a consistent pattern. Intense, isolated relationships and dominant-submissive dynamics are the fertile ground where these shared fortresses of belief are built against a perceived hostile world.

Regardless of shifting diagnostic labels or sensationalized cultural takes, Folie à Deux forces us to confront uncomfortable truths: the self is permeable, belief is malleable, and intimate bonds wield immense power. It’s a crucial, disturbing insight into how the line between individual and shared experience can blur, reminding us that the human psyche and the social ecosystems we inhabit are delicately, sometimes perilously, intertwined.

WORKS CITED

1. Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?: Analysis of Setting | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/whos-afraid-virginia-woolf-analysis-setting
2. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_%C3%A0_deux#:~:text=July%202020),from%20one%20individual%20to%20another.
3. Much Ado about ‘Folie à deux’ | Merriam-Webster, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/word-history-of-folie-a-deux
4. Shared Psychotic Disorder – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541211/
5. Folie à deux – Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_%C3%A0_deux
6. Delusional sharing: a history focus-on and case report of folie à deux – Rivista di Psichiatria, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.rivistadipsichiatria.it/archivio/2737/articoli/27910/
7. Shared Psychotic Disorder (Folie À Deux): A Rare Case with Dissociative Trance Disorder That Can Be Induced – PMC, accessed May 18, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6876800/
8. Brothers on Big Brother: A Case of Folie à Deux in Monozygotic …, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.clinicalschizophrenia.net/articles/brothers-on-big-brother-a-case-of-folie-deux-in-monozygotic-twin-males-85931.html
9. “Folie Á Deux”: A Delusion Shared by Two – Journal of Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.jmgumst.com/doi/JMGUMST/pdf/10.5005/jp-journals-10057-0141
10. durham-repository.worktribe.com, accessed May 18, 2025, https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/1468567
11. core.ac.uk, accessed May 18, 2025, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/302927171.pdf
12. What Is Folie à Deux? | London Psychologist Clinic, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.londonpsychologistclinic.co.uk/home/blog/what-is-folie-%C3%A0-deux
13. dergipark.org.tr, accessed May 18, 2025, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/98372
14. Shared Psychotic Disorder: Symptoms, Risk Factors, Diagnosis …, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/an-overview-of-shared-psychotic-disorder-4782190
15. Shared Psychotic Disorder – MD Searchlight, accessed May 18, 2025, https://mdsearchlight.com/mental-health/shared-psychotic-disorder/
16. Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of Folie a Deux: A …, accessed May 18, 2025, https://figshare.com/articles/poster/Characteristics_treatment_and_outcomes_of_Folie_a_Deux_A_systematic_review_of_case_reports_and_case_series_/22277821
17. Pharmacologic treatment of Folie a Deux. A systematic review – ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373925083_Pharmacologic_treatment_of_Folie_a_Deux_A_systematic_review
18. www.londonpsychologistclinic.co.uk, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.londonpsychologistclinic.co.uk/home/blog/what-is-folie-%C3%A0-deux#:~:text=Treatment%20for%20Folie%20%C3%A0%20Deux,be%20prescribed%20to%20manage%20symptoms.
19. Folie à deux – PMC, accessed May 18, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2919794/
20. What is Psychotherapy? – Psychiatry.org, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/psychotherapy
21. Poster-Pharmacologic treatment of Folie a Deux . A systematic review – Figshare, accessed May 18, 2025, https://figshare.com/articles/online_resource/Poster-Pharmacologic_treatment_of_Folie_a_Deux_A_systematic_review/24143580
22. BBC One – Madness in the Fast Lane, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00tf1r4
23. A Madness Shared by Two: True Story of the M6 Eriksson Twins & the Murder of Glenn Hollinshead – Amazon.com, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Madness-Shared-Two-Eriksson-Hollinshead/dp/0956848915
24. “Joker: Folie à Deux” is a true piece of meta-fiction and depiction of …, accessed May 18, 2025, https://chimesnewspaper.com/54056/opinions/joker-folie-a-deux-a-true-piece-of-meta-fiction-and-depiction-of-psychological-conditions/
25. Cinematography Analysis Of Joker: Folie À Deux (In Depth) – Color Culture, accessed May 18, 2025, https://colorculture.org/cinematography-analysis-of-joker-folie-a-deux-in-depth/
26. ‘Joker: Folie à Deux’ 2024: An Analysis (and why I loved it), accessed May 18, 2025, https://khambayswordswordswords.blog/2024/10/11/joker-folie-a-deux-an-analysis-and-why-i-loved-it/
27. Folie à Deux: A Sad Ending to Joker’s Psychological Torment, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-many-faces-of-anxiety-and-trauma/202410/folie-a-deux-a-sad-ending-to-jokers-psychological
28. REVIEW: “Joker: Folie à Deux” analysis and comparison – Manual RedEye, accessed May 18, 2025, https://manualredeye.com/98779/arts-entertainment/joker-folie-a-deux-review-and-comparison/
29. Heavenly Creatures | David Buckingham, accessed May 18, 2025, https://davidbuckingham.net/growing-up-modern/gender-trouble-cinema-and-the-mystery-of-adolescent-girlhood/heavenly-creatures/
30. Episode 572: Heavenly Creatures: The Parker-Hulme Murder Podcast Summary with Ash Kelley, Alaina Urquhart – Shortform, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.shortform.com/podcast/episode/morbid-2024-06-10-episode-summary-episode-572-heavenly-creatures-the-parker-hulme-murder
31. A Complete Analysis of William Friedkin’s “Bug” (2006), accessed May 18, 2025, https://filmsforweirdoswithwildheartsandsoaringsouls.wordpress.com/2015/02/16/a-complete-analysis-of-william-friedkins-bug-2006/
32. Folie à deux – The PACT Institute, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.thepactinstitute.com/blog/folie-a-deux
33. Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? – Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who%27s_Afraid_of_Virginia_Woolf%3F