Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs: Architects Of The Void, Sadistic Rituals

✚ T.O.C ✚

✚ 3 GUYS ONE HAMMER TRANSCRIPT ✚

Sayenko: “Hold on, hold on. Be neater, fuck!” –laughing- “Hold on, hold on, hold on, don’t hit him, don’t hit him. Watch him…”
Suprunyuck: “What? With what?”
Sayenko: “What, he’s still alive? He’s still moving his arms after I ripped up his intestines.”
Suprunyuck: “He’s having a fucked up day.”
Sayenko: “Get over here fast. Kill him already.”
Suprunyuck: “What?”
Sayenko: “Kill him already.”
Suprunyuck: “I already put the hammer back. He’s already dead.”
Sayenko: “I poked out his eyes and he’s still not dead. Get the knife.”
Sayenko: “I stuck the screwdriver in his brain. I got him in the nose from his eye. I don’t understand how he was alive? I felt his brain.”

3 Guys 1 Hammer is a Ukrainian shock video which was made in the summer of 2007. It shows video footage of three teenage boys (Viktor Sayenko, Igor Suprunyuk, and Alexander Hanzha) torturing and murdering 48-year-old Sergei Yatzenko who was disabled by a recent bout with cancer in the woods. The three teenagers became known as “The Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs.” They had killed 20 other people before making the infamous video. Sayenko, Suprunyuk, and Hanzha were eventually arrested and went on trial for the murders. They were eventually found guilty, with Sayenko and Suprunyuk both being given life sentences and Hanzha (who was not involved in the actual murders) getting nine years behind bars for two armed robberies that took place before the murder spree.^[1]

The man who was murdered in 3 Guys 1 Hammer was found missing after riding his Dnepr motorcycle. There is footage showing the three guys complaining about something in Ukrainian. After a few seconds, they notice Sergei Yatzenko riding his Dnepr motorcycle. As soon as he gets near, they kick down his wheels, causing the motorcycle to fall over. The boys trapped him in the woods before he was killed. The murderers’ previous murder scene was two teenage boys in Pidhorodne, named Andrei Sidyuk and Vadim Lyakhov, who was brutally attacked while they were fishing. Vadim managed to escape by hiding in the woods. The maniacs then killed Sergei.

Igor Suprunyuk and Viktor Sayenko:”Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs.”

The media, in its characteristic rush toward facile categorization, dubbed Igor Suprunyuk and Viktor Sayenko the “Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs.” This label, while viscerally effective, is a clinical banality. It obscures a more profound and disturbing truth: the 21 homicides committed in Ukraine during the summer of 2007 were not merely random, senseless acts of violence. They were meticulously, if unconsciously, choreographed performances—a series of self-devised rituals designed to satiate the profound psychological pathologies of their creators.

This analysis will deconstruct these homicides not as a “spree” but as a theatrical production. It will demonstrate that Suprunyuk and Sayenko, two severely psychopathic individuals, were the architects of a private, nihilistic belief system in which the act of killing became a transcendent, repeatable ceremony for enacting fantasies of absolute power and control. This report will move from the external evidence of the crime scenes—the stage—to the internal, chthonic world of the offenders—the playwrights of the void.

The Topography of the Abyss: Victimology and Crime Scene Analysis

To comprehend the minds of the offenders, one must first map the terrain of their actions. The crime scenes and victim selection provide the foundational text from which their psychological narrative can be extrapolated. It is here, in the effluvia of the act, that one distinguishes the practical necessities of murder from the compulsions of the psyche.

The Fallacy of Randomness: Victimology as Object Selection

The victimology in this series initially appears chaotic, a shotgun blast across the demographic landscape. Victims included men, women, children, and the elderly, with no discernible connection to the perpetrators or to each other. Many were chosen for their vulnerability: the homeless, the intoxicated, those traveling alone in isolated parks or on darkened streets. In a significant number of cases, the victims’ belongings were left untouched, a clear indicator that robbery was, at best, a tertiary motive and more likely an opportunistic afterthought.

This lack of a specific victim type is, in itself, the most telling aspect of the signature. Standard behavioral analysis often seeks a consistent victim profile, as seen in offenders like Ted Bundy. Here, the consistency is the very inconsistency. This demonstrates a complete depersonalization and objectification of the victims. They were not selected for who they were, but for what they represented: available, vulnerable props for a psychodrama. This is a hallmark of hedonistic thrill-killing, where the process—the hunt, the stalk, the kill—is the primary source of arousal, not the specific characteristics of the prey.

The selection of the vulnerable was not a matter of preference but of tactical efficiency; it reduced risk and facilitated the uninterrupted performance of the primary ritual. The fantasy was not tied to a specific person, but to the act of domination itself. Any human would suffice as the raw material for their art. Therefore, the apparent “randomness” is a crucial diagnostic marker of their motivation: the total, indiscriminate annihilation of the human Other.

Differentiating Craft from Compulsion: Modus Operandi vs. Signature

In any coherent analysis, a clear distinction must be drawn between the modus operandi (MO)—the practical actions required to commit the crime—and the signature—the acts that fulfill a psychological need. The former is learned and dynamic; the latter is compulsive and static. This framework, foundational to the work of Douglas and Ressler, is essential for dissecting the Dnepropetrovsk crimes.

The MO was brutally simple: blitz-style surprise attacks in isolated or low-light areas, utilizing readily available blunt-force instruments such as hammers and steel reinforcement bars. These are the actions of a predator concerned with the mechanics of the kill. The signature, however, resides in the efflorescence of violence that served no practical purpose. These are the acts unnecessary for the commission of murder but essential for the psychological gratification of the murderer.

They include the extreme overkill directed at the face, the specific and grotesque mutilations (gouging out eyes while the victim was alive, the reported excision of a fetus from a pregnant woman), and, most critically, the filming of the attacks. The absence of sexual assault is also a critical negative signature, steering the analysis away from a diagnosis of paraphilic lust murder and firmly toward sadistic thrill-killing and the assertion of absolute power.

Behavior	Classification	Function/Motivation
Use of hammers/steel bars	Modus Operandi	Practical, efficient, and readily available tools for incapacitation. Maximizes trauma with minimal skill.
Nighttime/isolated location attacks	Modus Operandi	Reduces risk of witness identification and intervention. Exploits victim vulnerability.
Targeting of head/face	Signature	Symbolic erasure of identity and humanity. The face is the seat of the self; its destruction is the ultimate act of depersonalization.
Extreme overkill	Signature	Fulfills sadistic fantasy. Expresses profound rage and contempt. Psychologically transforms the victim from person to object.
Filming the murder	Signature	Creates a trophy to relive the event and reinforce the fantasy. An act of narcissistic self-deification, controlling the narrative.
Eye gouging	Signature	A specific, intimate act of torture. Symbolically “blinds” the victim to the perpetrator’s power, an ultimate act of dominance.
Lack of sexual assault	Signature	Indicates the primary motivation is not sexual gratification in the conventional sense, but rather sadistic pleasure derived from terror, pain, and control.

The Semiotics of Overkill: Rage, Depersonalization, and Sadistic Gratification

Forensic examination of the victims, based on available reports, reveals a consistent pattern of massive blunt-force trauma, particularly to the cranium and face, far exceeding what was necessary to extinguish life. This phenomenon, clinically termed “overkill,” is often misinterpreted by laypersons as a sign of an offender losing control. In a psychopathic offender, the opposite is true. Overkill is a manifestation of profound, personalized rage or, in this case, a need to utterly depersonalize the victim.

Given the lack of a pre-existing relationship between the offenders and their victims, this overkill was not born of personal animus. It was an act of psychological alchemy. Through the application of overwhelming, repetitive force, the offenders were transforming a living human into a non-human object. This served a dual psychological purpose. First, it confirmed their god-like power to create and destroy identity. Second, it externalized their own internal emptiness and rage onto the victim.

The destroyed face became a canvas for their own vacuity, a mirror of their profound lack of empathy. This aligns perfectly with the core tenets of Sadistic Personality Disorder, where pleasure is derived not just from the act of killing, but from the humiliation and suffering of the other. The overkill is the physical receipt for that sadistic pleasure.

Architects of the Void: A Psychological Autopsy of Sayenko and Suprunyuk

Having examined the stage, the analysis now turns to the playwrights. The behaviors of Viktor Sayenko and Igor Suprunyuk, before, during, and after their crimes, provide a clear and chilling portrait of severe psychopathology. This is not the realm of speculation; it is a clinical diagnosis grounded in decades of behavioral science.

The Psychopathic Dyad: Deconstructing the Predator’s Mind

The offenders’ developmental histories contain classic precursors to violent offending. Their shared history of torturing and killing animals, documented with photographs, is a key component of the MacDonald Triad and a powerful predictor of future interpersonal violence. Their behavior during the filmed murder and subsequent trial was marked by a profound lack of empathy, guilt, or remorse—the affective core of psychopathy. They exhibited a constellation of traits including impulsivity, a chronic need for stimulation, proneness to boredom, and a grandiose sense of self-worth.

A clinical diagnosis of psychopathy is not only appropriate but necessary. Using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) as an assessment framework, both subjects, particularly Suprunyuk as the reported leader, would score well above the diagnostic threshold. Their pathology can be understood through the psychoanalytic lens of J. Reid Meloy, as a product of profound attachment failure (“no attachment”), chronic cortical underarousal manifesting as high-risk, thrill-seeking behavior, and a core of pathological narcissism. Their escalation from animal cruelty to homicide is a textbook example of a violent fantasy life breaking its tethers and spilling into reality.

PCL-R Item	Reconstructed Score	Justification/Case Evidence
1. Glibness/superficial charm	1	Limited data, but their ability to function socially and operate an unlicensed taxi (Suprunyuk) suggests some capacity for superficial interaction.
2. Grandiose sense of self-worth	2	The nature of the crimes—acts of “god-like” power—and the desire to film them for posterity are powerful indicators of extreme narcissism and grandiosity.
3. Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom	2	Pre-murder history of petty theft and vandalism. The escalating nature of the violence suggests a constant need for greater thrills.
4. Pathological lying	2	Initial denials and conflicting accounts during the investigation and trial.
5. Conning/manipulative	2	Luring vulnerable victims and manipulating situations to their advantage.
6. Lack of remorse or guilt	2	Chillingly detached demeanor in the “3GP video” and a complete absence of remorse during trial proceedings.
7. Shallow affect	2	Emotionless voices during the filmed murder of Yatzenko. Inability to form deep, meaningful bonds.
8. Callous/lack of empathy	2	The defining characteristic of the crime series. The brutal treatment of victims, including torture, demonstrates a total inability to comprehend or care about the suffering of others.
9. Parasitic lifestyle	1	Suprunyuk was officially unemployed. Some reliance on parents for resources (e.g., the car).
10. Poor behavioral controls	2	History of violence (beating a boy for his bike). The homicides themselves represent the ultimate failure of behavioral control.
12. Early behavior problems	2	Documented history of severe animal cruelty, a significant precursor to violent offending.
14. Impulsivity	2	The “random” selection of victims and opportunistic nature of many attacks suggest a high degree of impulsivity.
15. Irresponsibility	2	General disregard for societal norms and the law. Unemployed status and engagement in criminal activity.
16. Failure to accept responsibility	2	Suprunyuk’s retraction of his confession, blaming police coercion. A classic psychopathic trait.

(Note: Not all 20 items can be scored from available public data, but the pattern is clinically undeniable.)

The Sadistic Imperative: The Pursuit of Pleasure Through Pain

Psychopathy explains the ability to commit these acts without remorse, but it does not fully explain the motivation. For that, one must diagnose the sadistic component. The gratuitous violence, the torture of victims while they were still alive, and the clear enjoyment derived from their suffering are not merely ancillary to the murders; they are the point. This aligns with the clinical description of Sadistic Personality Disorder, which, though removed from the DSM, remains a vital descriptor for a specific type of offender. The primary driver for Suprunyuk and Sayenko was the derivation of profound psychological pleasure—a euphoric, intoxicating high—from the absolute domination and suffering of their victims.

Here, psychopathy and sadism exist in a symbiotic, mutually reinforcing relationship. Psychopathy provides the emotional void—the lack of empathy and conscience—that creates the “permission structure” for sadism to flourish. Sadism, in turn, provides the motivational fuel—the intoxicating pleasure of cruelty—that drives the psychopathic individual to act with such extreme prejudice. One is the engine; the other is the absence of brakes. This synergy explains the repetitive and escalating nature of the violence. It was not simply an antisocial acting-out (PCL-R Factor 2); it was the fulfillment of the core interpersonal and affective deficits (PCL-R Factor 1) through the methodical infliction of pain.

Fantasy as Grimoire: The Filmed Murders as Trophy and Text

The decision to film the murder of Sergei Yatzenko, creating the infamous “3GP video,” is perhaps the most psychologically significant act in the entire series. This behavior must be interpreted through the lens of fantasy reinforcement, a cornerstone of serial homicide psychology established by the BAU’s foundational research.

The video is not primarily for an external audience; it is a trophy. It is a tool that allows the offenders to relive the event, to re-experience the feeling of omnipotence, and to study and perfect their fantasy for future iterations. The act of filming transforms a fleeting, messy, physical event into a permanent, controllable artifact—a personal grimoire from which they can repeatedly draw psychological power. It is the ultimate act of objectification, turning the final moments of a man’s life into a piece of consumable media.

The presence of the camera fundamentally alters the dynamic of the event. It is no longer a dyad of killer and victim. It is a triad: actor, victim, and director. By controlling the camera, the offenders control the narrative, the gaze, and the memory of the act. They become the creators of their own reality, scripting and recording their own snuff film. This is a narcissistic act of self-deification. They are not just destroying a life; they are capturing it, possessing it, and rendering it eternal for their own private viewing pleasure. This moves beyond simple trophy-taking (like a piece of jewelry) into the creation of a perpetual, on-demand ritual.

The Simulacrum of Ritual: Interpreting the Esoteric Echoes

While the Dnepropetrovsk crimes lack the formal trappings of organized occultism, to dismiss the ritualistic component is to fundamentally misunderstand the offenders’ motivation. They were not following a pre-existing script; they were writing their own.

Idiosyncratic vs. Formal Ritual: The Creation of a Private Religion

There is no credible evidence linking Sayenko and Suprunyuk to any formal Satanic, occult, or religious group. Their acts were not sacrifices to an external deity. However, the absence of a formal belief system does not preclude the presence of deeply held ritual. The offenders engaged in what is best described as idiosyncratic ritualism—a private, self-generated ceremony that is no less psychologically potent for being unique.

The “ritual” was the entire behavioral sequence: the “hunt” for a victim, the selection and preparation of the weapon (the hammer), the bludgeoning (the sacrifice), the specific mutilations (the liturgy), and the filming (the preservation of the sacred act). This was a pseudo-occult practice where the only gods being worshipped were their own pathologically narcissistic egos, and the offering was the life and identity of another human being. Formal occult systems provide a pre-packaged framework of symbols and rites.

For a pathological narcissist with a grandiose sense of self, such a system is too restrictive. They must be the author of their own religion, the high priest of their own cult of two. The early animal cruelty, which involved drawing swastikas in blood and giving Nazi salutes, was not an expression of political ideology. It was an early, adolescent attempt to co-opt a powerful aesthetic of dominance, transgression, and cruelty to give form to their own burgeoning violent fantasies.

Symbolic Evidence Deconstruction: The Tools of the Theater

Every ritual has its tools, and the objects used by Sayenko and Suprunyuk were laden with symbolic meaning.

The Hammer: This is not a sophisticated weapon. Its selection is significant. It is atavistic, primitive, and requires close, physical, and brutal contact. It is a tool for smashing, for annihilation, not for clean or elegant killing. Its use maximizes the visceral, sensory experience of the act, representing the complete de-skilling and dehumanization of murder. It reduces the act to one of pure, brute force.
The Video Camera: As established, this is the modern equivalent of a ceremonial dagger or a sacred text. It is the tool used to capture and preserve the “soul” of the ritual. It transforms the temporal physical act into a permanent, metaphysical artifact, allowing the “magic” to be revisited and its power drawn upon indefinitely.
The Annihilated Face: The relentless focus on destroying the victim’s face is the symbolic climax of the ritual. In Western thought, the face is the seat of identity, the locus of the soul, the imago Dei. Its erasure is the final, definitive act that confirms the victim is no longer a person but a thing. It completes the psychological alchemy of the overkill, finalizing the transformation from subject to object.

Investigative Post-Mortem: A Critique of Institutional Response

The initial law enforcement response to this crime series was, to be charitable, inadequate. The decision to keep the investigation secret and issue no public warnings was a dereliction of duty that placed the community at further risk. The failure to officially link the murders until a victim, Vadim Lyakhov, managed to survive is indicative of a common institutional deficiency: an inability to recognize the behavioral patterns of signature-driven, motivationally amorphous serial crime. Law enforcement is trained to seek tangible motives: money, revenge, sexual jealousy. When confronted with crimes driven by the pure psychological gratification of thrill and sadism, traditional investigative models often falter.

The initial treatment of the surviving victim as a suspect, complete with reports of beatings during interrogation, is a textbook example of investigative tunnel vision and incompetence. Ultimately, the capture of these offenders did not result from proactive profiling or brilliant detective work. It resulted from their own carelessness in attempting to pawn a victim’s mobile phone. This is a humbling but frequent truth in this line of work: the most dangerous predators are often brought down not by our brilliance, but by their own stupidity and narcissistic overconfidence. The case stands as a stark reminder that a law enforcement apparatus unprepared for the psychology of the modern predator is an apparatus destined to fail.

Conclusion: The Vacancy of Evil

The profound horror of the Dnepropetrovsk homicides does not lie in some complex, supernatural conspiracy. The truth is far more terrifying. It is the horror of the void—the complete, ontological absence of empathy, conscience, and meaning that defines the severe sadistic psychopath. Igor Suprunyuk and Viktor Sayenko were not monsters in the mythical sense; they were empty vessels who could only experience a fleeting sensation of power and existence by violently annihilating the humanity of others.

Their idiosyncratic rituals were not designed to summon a demon from some external hell; they were designed to convince themselves, for a brief, ecstatic moment, that they were gods. The final analysis is that “evil,” in this clinical context, is not a presence. It is a profound, unbreachable, and terrifying vacancy.

V. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

A series of common inquiries have arisen regarding this case. The following provides clinically grounded, concise responses to dispel popular misconceptions.

Who were the Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs?

The subjects were Igor Suprunyuk and Viktor Sayenko, two 19-year-old men from Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine. Along with a third accomplice, Alexander Hanzha, who participated in prior robberies, they were responsible for a series of 21 homicides and numerous assaults in the summer of 2007. The “maniacs” label is a media creation; clinically, they are better understood as sadistic psychopaths engaged in thrill-killing.

What was their primary motivation for killing?

The motivation was purely psychological gratification. This was not about financial gain, as valuables were often left at the scene. The core driver was hedonistic thrill-seeking—the euphoric, adrenaline-like high derived from the process of stalking, capturing, and dominating their victims. The acts were a manifestation of their sadistic and psychopathic personalities, where inflicting terror and pain provides intense stimulation and reinforces a grandiose sense of power.

Why did they film their crimes?

The act of recording the murder of Sergei Yatzenko was a signature behavior, not an MO requirement. The video served as a psychological trophy, allowing the offenders to relive the event and re-experience the feeling of omnipotence. It transforms a transient act into a permanent artifact, reinforcing their violent fantasies and serving as a narcissistic tool of self-deification. They become the directors of their own reality, controlling the narrative of the victim’s final moments for their own repeated gratification.

Were the killers involved in organized Satanism or occult rituals?

There is no credible evidence linking the subjects to any formal occult or Satanic organization. Their actions are best classified as idiosyncratic ritualism—a private, self-devised ceremony. The early use of swastikas and Nazi salutes during their period of animal cruelty was not ideological, but an adolescent co-opting of a powerful aesthetic of dominance to give form to their violent fantasies. The “ritual” was the murder sequence itself, a secular ceremony where their own egos were the only deities being worshipped.

What psychological conditions did they have?

Both Suprunyuk and Sayenko exhibited a clear constellation of traits consistent with a diagnosis of severe Psychopathy, as defined by the Hare PCL-R. This includes a profound lack of empathy and remorse, manipulativeness, grandiosity, and a chronic need for stimulation. Furthermore, the gratuitous violence and clear enjoyment derived from the victims’ suffering points to a comorbid Sadistic Personality Disorder, a condition where pleasure is derived from cruelty.

How were they eventually caught?

Their capture was not the result of sophisticated criminal profiling or investigation. It was a product of their own carelessness and impulsivity. The subjects were apprehended on July 23, 2007, after attempting to pawn a mobile phone stolen from one of their victims. Authorities were able to trace the phone, which led directly to their identification and arrest.

Works cited

Sadistic Personality Disorder: Definition, Causes, Types, and Interventions, accessed September 21, 2025, https://counselingnow.com/sadistic-personality-disorder/
Investigative Analysis- The Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs – Unmasking the Depravity of “Catch and Kill”.pdf
Dnepropetrovsk maniacs – Wikipedia, accessed September 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dnepropetrovsk_maniacs
Why Some People Kill For Thrills | Psychology Today, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/wicked-deeds/201401/why-some-people-kill-for-thrills
Signature crime – Wikipedia, accessed September 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_crime
Offender’s Signature vs. Modus Operandi | Author Jennifer Chase, accessed September 21, 2025, https://authorjenniferchase.com/2011/06/22/offender%E2%80%99s-signature-vs-modus-operandi/
John Douglas on His Life’s Work: Talking with Killers – CrimeReads, accessed September 21, 2025, https://crimereads.com/john-douglas-on-his-lifes-work-talking-with-killers/
Understanding the mind of a serial killer, with Louis Schlesinger, PhD, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/serial-killer-mind
A multidisciplinary approach in overkill: Analysis of 13 cases and …, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331956808_A_multidisciplinary_approach_in_overkill_Analysis_of_13_cases_and_review_of_the_literature
Passionate Homicides and Overkilling. A Forensic Case Series of Overkill in Rome (Italy) from 1999 to 2015 – La Clinica Terapeutica, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.clinicaterapeutica.it/ojs/index.php/1/article/download/911/753
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10654167/#:~:text=The%20core%20feature%20of%20sadistic,371%5D.
Sadism and Personality Disorders – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10654167/
A Descriptive Study of Serial Killers and the Presence of Macdonald Triad Symptoms – ScholarWorks@GVSU, accessed September 21, 2025, https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/context/theses/article/2018/viewcontent/V._Zuniga_Thesis.pdf
Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCLR) – Addiction Research Center, accessed September 21, 2025, https://arc.psych.wisc.edu/self-report/psychopathy-checklist-revised-pclr/
Psychopathy Checklist – Wikipedia, accessed September 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy_Checklist
Psychopathy & Aggression: When Paralimbic Dysfunction Leads to Violence – PMC, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4331058/
A Psychoanalytic View of the Psychopath – ResearchGate, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Meloy-2/publication/287584013_The_internal_world_of_the_psychopath/links/568d52e808ae78cc0514194d/The-internal-world-of-the-psychopath.pdf
Introduction, accessed September 21, 2025, https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-3087863-547a2f3790.pdf
Serial Killers and the Essential Role of Fantasy | Psychology Today, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/wicked-deeds/201410/serial-killers-and-the-essential-role-fantasy
Sadistic personality disorder – Wikipedia, accessed September 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadistic_personality_disorder
Sadistic Personality Disorder: Meaning, Signs, Types, Causes – MedicineNet, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.medicinenet.com/can_sadistic_personality_be_cured/article.htm
The presumptive role of fantasy in serial sexual homicide – PubMed, accessed September 21, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2787122/
Robert Ressler’s FBI Career: Profiling Killers – Shortform, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.shortform.com/books/blog/robert-ressler-fbi.html
Cults That Kill: Probing the Underworld of Occult Crime – Office of Justice Programs, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/cults-kill-probing-underworld-occult-crime
Satanic panic – Wikipedia, accessed September 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_panic
The Myth of the New England Serial Killer – CT Examiner, accessed September 21, 2025, https://ctexaminer.com/2025/07/12/the-myth-of-the-new-england-serial-killer/
Serial Killer: The Mechanism from Imagination to the Murder Phases – Scirp.org, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=74772
Exploring the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: 2nd Edition – Multi-Health Systems, accessed September 21, 2025, https://mhs.com/blog/exploring-the-hare-psychopathy-checklist-revised-2nd-edition/
(PDF) The Psychology of Wickedness: Psychopathy and Sadism – ResearchGate, accessed September 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269476584_The_Psychology_of_Wickedness_Psychopathy_and_Sadism

✚ Homicide✚ Sadism✚ Criminal Psychology✚ Psychopathy✚ Mutilation✚ Forensic Psychology✚ Victimology✚ Modus Operandi✚ Torture✚ Dehumanization✚ Sadist✚ Serial Killer✚ Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs✚ Sadistic Personality Disorder ✚

Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs: Architects of the Void, Sadistic Rituals