Herbert Mullin

Herbert Mullin: Schizophrenia, Violence, and the Law

Explore the complex intersection of mental illness and criminal behavior through the tragic case of Herbert Mullin, who, influenced by severe schizophrenia, committed 13 murders in the 1970s.
Start
by 30/04/2025
0 views
15 mins read

1. Introduction: Herbert Mullin – A Forensic Psychiatric Case Study

  • Mullin’s Crimes: Brutally murdered 13 people in California in the early 1970s, driven by delusions of preventing earthquakes.
  • Mental Health: Suffered from paranoid , highlighting the link between severe mental illness and extreme violence.
  • Legal Implications: Case raises questions about psychiatric risk assessment, insanity definitions, and the challenges of managing psychotic individuals within the criminal justice system.

2. Early Life and the Descent into Psychosis

Biographical Details and Early Promise

  • Early Life: Born on April 18, 1947, in Salinas, California, and raised in a strict Roman Catholic family.
  • Adolescence: Well-liked, socially engaged, and academically promising, with no signs of mental illness.
  • Mental Illness Onset: Developed schizophrenia in late adolescence or early adulthood, leading to a significant decline in mental health.

Pivotal Trauma: Dean Richardson’s Death (1965)

  • Impact of Friend’s Death: Dean Richardson’s death in 1965 deeply affected Mullin, leading to unusual behaviours like creating shrines and exploring reincarnation.
  • Mental Health Deterioration: The loss is seen as a catalyst for Mullin’s deteriorating mental state, potentially triggering psychosis in someone with underlying vulnerability.
  • Trauma and Schizophrenia: While not a direct cause, the traumatic event of Richardson’s death is believed to have precipitated Mullin’s latent illness and influenced his later delusions.

Emergence of Schizophrenia Symptoms and Substance Use

  • Mental Health Deterioration: Mullin’s behaviour became erratic and showed signs of psychosis after Richardson’s death, including isolation, withdrawal, and paranoid beliefs.
  • Schizophrenia Symptoms: Mullin exhibited echopraxia, persecutory delusions, and command auditory hallucinations, which are all symptoms of schizophrenia.
  • Substance Abuse and Its Impact: Mullin’s experimentation with marijuana and LSD likely worsened or accelerated his schizophrenia, contributing to his paranoia, disorganized thinking, and hallucinations.

Initial Hospitalizations and Diagnosis

  • Mental Health Diagnosis: Diagnosed with schizophrenia, aggravated by drug abuse, after an incident involving echopraxia.
  • Treatment History: Poor engagement with treatment, including uncooperative behaviour, lack of insight into illness (anosognosia), and discontinuation of medication.
  • Systemic Challenges: Repeated discharges from mental health facilities, potentially due to legal limitations on involuntary holds and insufficient community resources, highlighting challenges in managing severe schizophrenia.

3. The Killing Spree: Timeline and Delusional Motivations

Timeline Overview and Victim Profile

Between October 13, 1972, and February 13, 1973, Herbert Mullin terrorized Santa Cruz County, California, and its surrounding areas, killing 13 people in four months. His victims were randomly chosen from a diverse demographic range, with ages from 4 to 72. The methods of murder varied, including bludgeoning, stabbing, and shooting.

The following table provides a chronological overview of key events in Herbert Mullin’s life, contextualizing the murder spree within his broader history:

EventDate / PeriodAgeSource(s)
BirthApril 18, 19470 
Dean Richardson’s DeathSummer 196518 
First HospitalizationFeb/Mar 196921/22 
Murder Spree BeginsOctober 13, 197225 
Murder Spree Ends / ArrestFebruary 13, 197325 
Trial (Approx.)June – August 197326 
Sentencing (Santa Cruz)September 18, 197326 
Sentencing (Santa Clara)December 21, 197326 
Last Parole Hearing (Denied)March 18, 202173/74 
DeathAugust 18, 202275 

This timeline provides a crucial chronological framework, visually connecting potential triggers (Richardson’s death), the documented onset of illness (first hospitalization), the rapid escalation to violence, the subsequent legal response, and the extensive period of incarceration, thereby facilitating an understanding of the case’s progression over Mullin’s lifespan.

Specific Murders

The sequence of Mullin’s killings illustrates the escalating and varied nature of his violence:

  • Lawrence “Whitey” White (55): Oct 13, 1972 – Clubbed to death with a baseball bat.
  • Mary Margaret Guilfoyle (24): Oct 24, 1972 – Stabbed, and her body was subsequently disemboweled and dissected. Her remains were discovered months later.
  • Father Henri Tomei (64): Nov 2, 1972 – Stabbed and beaten to death within the confessional booth. Reportedly killed shortly after confessing prior murders.
  • Jim Ralph Gianera (25): Jan 25, 1973 – Shot and stabbed. Mullin claimed Gianera had given him his first marijuana cigarette years prior.
  • Joan Gianera (21): Jan 25, 1973 – Shot and stabbed. Jim Gianera’s wife.
  • Kathy Francis (29): Jan 25, 1973 – Shot and stabbed. Mullin had visited her home earlier seeking the Gianeras and returned later to kill her.
  • Daemon Francis (4): Jan 25, 1973 – Shot and stabbed. Kathy Francis’s young son.
  • David Hughes (9): Jan 25, 1973 – Shot and stabbed. Child present in Kathy Francis’s home.
  • David Oliker (18): Feb 10, 1973 – Shot while camping with friends.
  • Robert Spector (18): Feb 10, 1973 – Shot during the same camping incident.
  • Brian Scott Card (19): Feb 10, 1973 – Shot during the same camping incident.
  • Mark Dreibelbis (15): Feb 10, 1973 – Shot while camping. The youngest of the four teenagers shot while camping.
  • Fred Abbie Perez (72): Feb 13, 1973 – Shot with a rifle while working in his yard. This murder was witnessed, leading directly to Mullin’s arrest.

The following table provides a detailed list of the victims, underscoring the scope and indiscriminate nature of the violence:

Table 2: Victims of Herbert Mullin

#NameSexAgeDate of MurderMethod/NotesSource(s)
1Lawrence WhiteM55Oct 13, 1972Clubbed with baseball bat 
2Mary M. GuilfoyleF24Oct 24, 1972Stabbed, dissected/disemboweled 
3Father Henri TomeiM64Nov 2, 1972Beaten, stabbed in confessional 
4Jim R. GianeraM25Jan 25, 1973Shot, stabbed; friend linked to marijuana 
5Joan GianeraF21Jan 25, 1973Shot, stabbed; Jim Gianera’s wife 
6Kathy FrancisF29Jan 25, 1973Shot, stabbed 
7Daemon FrancisM4Jan 25, 1973Shot, stabbed; Kathy Francis’s son 
8David HughesM9Jan 25, 1973Shot, stabbed; Present at Francis home 
9David OlikerM18Feb 10, 1973Shot while camping 
10Robert SpectorM18Feb 10, 1973Shot while camping 
11Brian Scott CardM19Feb 10, 1973Shot while camping 
12Mark DreibelbisM15Feb 10, 1973Shot while camping 
13Fred Abbie PerezM72Feb 13, 1973Shot while gardening; led to arrest 

Mullin’s Delusional System and Motivations

  • Mullin’s Delusions: Believed he was preventing a catastrophic earthquake and linked it to his birthday, the anniversary of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.
  • Hallucinations and Command: Experienced command auditory hallucinations, hearing voices instructing him to kill, which he attributed to his father or Satan.
  • Magical Thinking: Believed in telepathic communication, claiming his victims gave him permission to kill them and that his father communicated commands telepathically.

4. Arrest, Trial, and the Insanity Defense

Circumstances of Arrest and Confession

Herbert Mullin’s four-month killing spree ended on February 13, 1973, when a neighbour heard a gunshot, saw Mullin driving away, and noted his license plate. The neighbour alerted the police, who apprehended Mullin quickly.

In custody, Mullin confessed to all 13 murders, explaining his delusional belief that the killings were necessary to prevent earthquakes in California. A search of his apartment found evidence, including a Bible, newspaper clippings about the murders, an address book with Jim Gianera’s contact information, and Father Henri Tomei’s rosary pouch, the priest he had murdered weeks earlier.

Herbert Mullin

The Trial of Herbert Mullin (1973)

Mullin faced legal proceedings primarily in Santa Cruz County, where most of the murders occurred. He was formally charged with ten counts of murder for the victims killed in that county. Initially, these charges didn’t include the murders of Lawrence White and Mary Guilfoyle (whose body was found later) or the killing of Father Tomei in neighbouring Santa Clara County. Mullin later faced separate legal consequences for the Tomei murder in Santa Clara County.

His trial in Santa Cruz County began in June 1973 and ended in August of the same year. Mullin pleaded Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI).

The Insanity Plea: Psychiatric Testimony and Legal Standards

  • Defence Strategy: Mullin’s paranoid schizophrenia, including delusions and hallucinations, met the legal insanity criteria at the time of the murders.
  • Prosecution Strategy: Mullin understood the nature and wrongfulness of his actions, despite his psychosis, based on evidence like his confession, actions, and acknowledgment of illegality.
  • Legal Insanity Standard: The M’Naghten Rule was likely used to assess if Mullin’s mental illness prevented him from understanding the nature and wrongfulness of his actions.
  • Legal Insanity vs. Mental Illness: Mullin’s trial highlights the difference between severe mental illness and meeting the legal criteria for insanity.
  • Insanity Defence and Cognitive Awareness: Despite being diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, Mullin was found legally sane, suggesting the jury believed he had cognitive awareness of his actions.
  • M’Naghten Standard and Cognitive Criteria: The verdict emphasizes the cognitive aspect of the insanity test in Anglo-American law, which often prioritizes cognitive awareness over volitional impairment.

Verdict, Convictions, and Sentencing

  • Trial Outcome: Found guilty of 10 counts of murder in Santa Cruz County, deemed legally sane at the time of the offences.
  • Sentencing: Life imprisonment with the possibility of parole, including concurrent life sentences for first-degree murders and consecutive sentences for second-degree murders.
  • Incarceration: Sentenced to state prison, specifically the California Health Care Facility, indicating ongoing psychiatric management despite a guilty verdict.

5. Paranoid Schizophrenia: Diagnosis, Symptoms, and Violence

Clinical Picture of Mullin’s Schizophrenia

Herbert Mullin carried a confirmed diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia. The onset of his illness occurred during late adolescence and early adulthood, a pattern consistent with the typical developmental course of the disorder. His clinical presentation was characterized by a range of symptoms typical of schizophrenia:

TopicDetails
DiagnosisParanoid Schizophrenia
OnsetLate adolescence (17-19) and early adulthood (20-22)
Positive SymptomsProminent. Delusions (persecutory, grandiose, religious, somatic), auditory hallucinations (command type). Bizarre, complex delusional system.
Negative SymptomsSocial withdrawal (limited interaction with family), isolation (preferred to be alone), possible avolition/apathy
Cognitive SymptomsLack of insight (anosognosia), difficulties with thought processes (disorganized thinking), potential exacerbation by early life trauma
Other SymptomsEchopraxia (mirroring movements), extreme aggression (physical attacks), lethal violence (multiple homicides)

The Relationship Between Schizophrenia and Violence: An Evidence-Based Analysis

TopicDetails
Elevated Relative RiskIndividuals with schizophrenia have a higher risk of violence compared to the general population. Men with schizophrenia are approximately 4 to 5 times more likely, and women perhaps 8 times or more likely, to commit a violent act. The relative risk for appears particularly elevated, with some studies suggesting odds ratios around 20 times higher.
Role of Comorbid Substance AbuseIncreased risk of violence is strongly associated with comorbid substance use disorders. Individuals with both schizophrenia and a substance use disorder exhibit a significantly higher risk of violence (pooled odds ratio around 8.9) compared to those with schizophrenia alone (pooled odds ratio around 2.1). Violence risk in individuals with dual diagnoses is comparable to the risk in individuals who have substance use disorders but do not have psychosis.
Context and Low Absolute RiskThe absolute risk of violence among individuals with schizophrenia remains low. The vast majority of people with schizophrenia are never violent. Violence risk is influenced by broader societal factors. Public perception often inflates the link between schizophrenia and violence, contributing to stigma.
Neurobiological FactorsResearch explores potential neurobiological factors, including genetic factors (e.g., COMT gene variations) and neuroimaging findings (e.g., structural or functional abnormalities in frontal and temporal brain regions). Findings are complex, not universally replicated, and require further investigation.

Schizophrenia patients with comorbid substance abuse face a significantly higher risk of violence. Mullin’s documented use of LSD and cannabis during his illness and violent episodes confirms this research. His case illustrates the dangerous synergy of active psychosis, poor treatment adherence due to anosognosia, and substance use. Addressing substance use disorders concurrently with psychotic symptoms is crucial for reducing violence risk in individuals with dual diagnoses.

Mullin’s Case in Context

Herbert Mullin’s extreme and rare violence, linked to schizophrenia, is a direct result of his psychotic symptoms, particularly command hallucinations and delusions about earthquake prevention. Comorbid substance use (LSD, cannabis) amplifies the violence risk in schizophrenia. His persistent lack of insight and poor treatment adherence contribute to relapse, symptom exacerbation, and an increased risk of violence.

6. Contributing Factors: A Psychiatric Perspective

Understanding the complex trajectory of Herbert Mullin’s illness and subsequent violent actions requires considering multiple potential contributing factors from a psychiatric viewpoint:

Trauma, Grief, and Loss (Death of Dean Richardson)

  • Impact of Dean Richardson’s Death: A significant psychosocial stressor and traumatic event during a critical developmental stage, potentially triggering Mullin’s schizophrenia.
  • Role of Trauma in Schizophrenia: Traumatic experiences, especially during sensitive developmental periods, can trigger psychosis in individuals with genetic predisposition.
  • Influence of Trauma on Psychotic Symptoms: Trauma can induce neurobiological changes and influence the content of psychotic symptoms, as seen in Mullin’s grief-related themes.

Substance Use (LSD, Cannabis) as an Accelerant/Exacerbator

Mullin’s use of LSD and cannabis began after Richardson’s death, coinciding with his mental decline. Clinical literature and previous research show that cannabis and hallucinogens increase the risk of psychosis in vulnerable individuals. For those with schizophrenia, these substances worsen symptoms, increase relapse, and lead to poorer treatment outcomes. Mullin’s substance use likely exacerbated his psychosis, accelerating its progression, intensifying his delusions and hallucinations, and contributing to his functional decline and violent behaviour.

Family, Upbringing, and Insight (Anosognosia)

  • Family Background: Mullin came from a strict Roman Catholic family with a stern father.
  • Mullin’s Blame: Mullin blamed his parents and sister for his crimes, attributing them to an “inappropriate upbringing”.
  • Mental Health: Mullin developed persecutory delusions involving his parents, believing they were hindering his sexual development.
  • Lack of Insight: Mullin consistently denied being ill and refused medication, highlighting a profound lack of insight into his mental illness.
  • Anosognosia as a Symptom: This lack of insight is now understood as a core symptom of schizophrenia, linked to brain dysfunction rather than psychological defence mechanisms.
  • Impact on Treatment and Rehabilitation: Mullin’s anosognosia hindered treatment, rehabilitation, and risk reduction efforts, serving as a poor prognostic indicator.

7. Life Behind Bars: Incarceration, Parole Denials, and Death

Sentence Served and Prison Location(s)

  • Incarceration Duration: Herbert Mullin served nearly five decades of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole.
  • Final Incarceration Location: Mullin was incarcerated at the California Health Care Facility (CHCF) in Stockton at the time of his death.
  • Reason for Final Incarceration Location: Mullin required ongoing, specialized medical and mental health care due to chronic schizophrenia and potentially other age-related health issues.

Parole Hearings: Outcomes and Rationale for Denial

  • Parole Eligibility and Denials: Mullin became eligible for parole in the 1980s but was consistently denied release for over four decades.
  • Reason for Denial: The Board denied parole due to Mullin’s lack of insight into his mental illness, lack of remorse, and tendency to externalize blame.
  • Recent Parole Hearing: Mullin’s most recent parole hearing in 2021 resulted in a seven-year denial period, with the next hearing scheduled for 2028.
Herbert Mullin

Confirmation of Death

Herbert William Mullin, 75, died of natural causes while incarcerated in Stockton. His death, resulting from severe mental illness, ended his life and future parole considerations.

8. Comparative Perspectives: Mullin, Mental Illness, and the Insanity Defense

Herbert Mullin’s case is one among many complex and often tragic instances where severe mental illness, particularly schizophrenia, intersects with the criminal justice system, frequently involving the contentious issue of the insanity defence. Comparing his case to other notable examples highlights recurring themes, differing legal outcomes, and the evolution of legal approaches over time.

Overview of Other Notable Cases

Case NameDetails
John Hinckley Jr.Acquitted by reason of insanity (NGRI) in 1982 for attempting to assassinate President Ronald Reagan. Claimed he wanted to impress Jodie Foster. His acquittal led to reforms that tightened insanity defense laws.
David Berkowitz (“Son of Sam”)Killed six people in New York City. Initially claimed to act on commands from a neighbor’s “demonic dog.” Diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, found competent, and pleaded guilty.
Ed GeinCommitted murder, grave robbing, and mutilation. Diagnosed with schizophrenia, initially found unfit, later found NGRI, and confined to psychiatric institutions.
Andrew GoldsteinDiagnosed with schizophrenia, pushed Kendra Webdale to her death in front of a subway train in 1999. His case highlighted issues with community mental health treatment.
Jeffrey DahmerConvicted of murder, mutilation, and cannibalism of 15 young men. His insanity plea was rejected, and he was found legally sane.
  • Legal Outcome Variability: Despite shared characteristics of severe mental illness and extreme violence, legal outcomes for individuals like Mullin, Hinckley, Gein, Berkowitz, and Dahmer varied significantly.
  • Factors Influencing Outcomes: Jurisdiction-specific legal standards, trial evidence and arguments, jury perceptions, prosecutorial decisions, and societal context all contribute to the variability in legal outcomes.
  • Impact of Mental Illness Diagnosis: A diagnosis of severe mental illness, even linked to criminal behaviour, does not guarantee a specific legal outcome.

9. Evolution of the Insanity Defense and Societal Perceptions

(Note: Renumbered from the original structure for clarity, as there were two sections labeled ‘8’.)

The legal concept of insanity, distinguishing between those deemed responsible for their actions and those whose mental state at the time of the offense precludes responsibility, has a long and evolving history.

  • Insanity Defence Definition: Distinguishes between individuals responsible for their actions and those not responsible due to mental defects.
  • M’Naghten Rule: A foundational standard in many English-speaking jurisdictions, focusing on the defendant’s cognitive capacity to understand the nature and quality of their actions and whether they knew the act was wrong.
  • Public Perception Shift: Historically, NGRI verdicts often led to indefinite confinement, but later legal rulings and advancements in psychiatric treatment allowed for potential release after shorter periods, leading to public concern and skepticism.
  • Insanity Defence Reform: Many U.S. states and the federal system enacted significant reforms to their insanity laws after the acquittal of John Hinckley Jr. in 1982.
  • Key Reform Changes: Reforms included tightening the legal standard, shifting the burden of proof onto the defendant, and introducing alternative verdicts like “Guilty But Mentally Ill”.
  • Herbert Mullin’s Trial Significance: Mullin’s 1973 trial highlighted the challenges of applying cognitive-based insanity standards to individuals with profound psychosis, whose actions are driven by delusions and hallucinations.

10. Conclusion: Enduring Implications of the Mullin Case

  • Mental Health Diagnosis: Herbert Mullin suffered from paranoid schizophrenia, likely triggered by personal trauma and substance abuse.
  • Motivation for Violence: Mullin’s killing spree was driven by delusions about earthquake prevention, human sacrifice, and auditory hallucinations.
  • Legal Outcome: Despite a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia, Mullin was found legally sane and convicted of murder, highlighting the complexities of the legal system’s response to mental illness.
  • Mental Illness and Violence: Untreated severe mental illness, especially psychosis, can lead to devastating outcomes, particularly when combined with substance abuse and lack of insight.
  • Legal Insanity Defence Limitations: Legal insanity defences, especially those focused on cognitive capacity, face challenges in addressing crimes driven by delusional states and compromised volition.
  • Systemic Challenges in Mental Health Care: The case highlights potential systemic difficulties in managing high-risk individuals with mental illness within existing mental health frameworks and legal constraints.
  • Treatment Approach: Integrated treatment is crucial for addressing both primary psychotic disorders and comorbid substance use disorders.
  • System Challenges: Mental health and legal systems face challenges in managing individuals with severe mental illness who pose a potential danger to others.
  • Research Needs: Continued research is essential for understanding and treating anosognosia, improving treatment adherence, refining violence risk assessment, and promoting responsible public discourse about mental illness.

11. Bibliography

All Monsters Are Human

Criminal Report: The Magdalena Solis Case And The Yerba Buena Cult Killings
Previous Story

Criminal Report: The Magdalena Solis Case and the Yerba Buena Cult Killings

Rostov Ripper
Next Story

Rostov Ripper: Soviet Horror Story

All Monsters Are Human

The Dark Side of Humanity

Go toTop

New Poison

Futuristic Robot Head With Glowing Red Eyes And Zippers

The Somerset Gimp: A Peculiar Tale of Latex and Lunacy

A peculiar figure known as the "Somerset Gimp" has been…
Injured Elderly Man With Bloody Makeup At Night

10 Obscure Serial Killer Facts You Didn’t Know

Alright, rookies, gather ’round. Today’s lesson is on those delightful…